ADIT, DEHRADUN vs. M/S. M.I. OVERSEAS LTD., NOIDA

In the result ITA number 5584/Del/2013 filed by the assessee for assessment year

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

263 of the income tax act dated 28th of March 2011 for the same assessment year before the coordinate bench which is reported in 22 taxmann.com 227 (Delhi) and the appeal of the assessee was dismissed. He submitted that though the appeal was dismissed holding that there is an order which is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest

ADIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), DEHRADUN vs. M/S. M.I, OVERSEAS LTD., MUMBAI

In the result ITA number 5584/Del/2013 filed by the assessee for assessment year

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

263 of the income tax act dated 28th of March 2011 for the same assessment year before the coordinate bench which is reported in 22 taxmann.com 227 (Delhi) and the appeal of the assessee was dismissed. He submitted that though the appeal was dismissed holding that there is an order which is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest

MI OVERSEAS LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ADIT, DEHRADUN

In the result ITA number 5584/Del/2013 filed by the assessee for assessment year

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

263 of the income tax act dated 28th of March 2011 for the same assessment year before the coordinate bench which is reported in 22 taxmann.com 227 (Delhi) and the appeal of the assessee was dismissed. He submitted that though the appeal was dismissed holding that there is an order which is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest

MI OVERSEAS LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ADIT, DEHRADUN

In the result ITA number 5584/Del/2013 filed by the assessee for assessment year

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

263 of the income tax act dated 28th of March 2011 for the same assessment year before the coordinate bench which is reported in 22 taxmann.com 227 (Delhi) and the appeal of the assessee was dismissed. He submitted that though the appeal was dismissed holding that there is an order which is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest

ADIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), DEHRADUN vs. M/S. M.I, OVERSEAS LTD., MUMBAI

In the result ITA number 5584/Del/2013 filed by the assessee for assessment year

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

263 of the income tax act dated 28th of March 2011 for the same assessment year before the coordinate bench which is reported in 22 taxmann.com 227 (Delhi) and the appeal of the assessee was dismissed. He submitted that though the appeal was dismissed holding that there is an order which is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest

VETERINARY HOSPITAL, HAWALBAGH,ALMORA vs. ITO(TDS), HALDWANI

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessees are allowed for

263 601 (Uttarakhand). (PAN : MRTVO1826G) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : None REVENUE BY : Smt. Poonam Sharma, Addl. CIT DR Date of Hearing : 22.09.2023 Date of Order : 22.09.2023 ORDER PER BENCH : These appeals by the assessees are directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax for the concerned assessment years. 2. Since the issues are common and the appeals

VETERINARY HOSPITAL, HAWALBAGH,ALMORA vs. ITO(TDS), HALDWANI

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessees are allowed for

263 601 (Uttarakhand). (PAN : MRTVO1826G) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : None REVENUE BY : Smt. Poonam Sharma, Addl. CIT DR Date of Hearing : 22.09.2023 Date of Order : 22.09.2023 ORDER PER BENCH : These appeals by the assessees are directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax for the concerned assessment years. 2. Since the issues are common and the appeals

CHIEF VERERINARY HOSPITAL, ALMORA,ALMORA vs. ITO(TDS), HALDWANI

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessees are allowed for

263 601 (Uttarakhand). (PAN : MRTVO1826G) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : None REVENUE BY : Smt. Poonam Sharma, Addl. CIT DR Date of Hearing : 22.09.2023 Date of Order : 22.09.2023 ORDER PER BENCH : These appeals by the assessees are directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax for the concerned assessment years. 2. Since the issues are common and the appeals

CHIEF VERERINARY HOSPITAL, ALMORA,ALMORA vs. ITO(TDS), HALDWANI

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessees are allowed for

263 601 (Uttarakhand). (PAN : MRTVO1826G) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : None REVENUE BY : Smt. Poonam Sharma, Addl. CIT DR Date of Hearing : 22.09.2023 Date of Order : 22.09.2023 ORDER PER BENCH : These appeals by the assessees are directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax for the concerned assessment years. 2. Since the issues are common and the appeals

COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTRE, JAINTY,ALMORA vs. ITO (TDS), HALDWANI

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessees are allowed for

263 601 (Uttarakhand). (PAN : MRTVO1826G) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : None REVENUE BY : Smt. Poonam Sharma, Addl. CIT DR Date of Hearing : 22.09.2023 Date of Order : 22.09.2023 ORDER PER BENCH : These appeals by the assessees are directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax for the concerned assessment years. 2. Since the issues are common and the appeals

COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTRE, JAINTY,ALMORA vs. ITO (TDS), HALDWANI

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessees are allowed for

263 601 (Uttarakhand). (PAN : MRTVO1826G) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : None REVENUE BY : Smt. Poonam Sharma, Addl. CIT DR Date of Hearing : 22.09.2023 Date of Order : 22.09.2023 ORDER PER BENCH : These appeals by the assessees are directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax for the concerned assessment years. 2. Since the issues are common and the appeals

COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTRE, JAINTY,ALMORA vs. ITO (TDS), HALDWANI

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessees are allowed for

263 601 (Uttarakhand). (PAN : MRTVO1826G) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : None REVENUE BY : Smt. Poonam Sharma, Addl. CIT DR Date of Hearing : 22.09.2023 Date of Order : 22.09.2023 ORDER PER BENCH : These appeals by the assessees are directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax for the concerned assessment years. 2. Since the issues are common and the appeals

COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTRE, JAINTY,ALMORA vs. ITO (TDS), HALDWANI

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessees are allowed for

263 601 (Uttarakhand). (PAN : MRTVO1826G) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : None REVENUE BY : Smt. Poonam Sharma, Addl. CIT DR Date of Hearing : 22.09.2023 Date of Order : 22.09.2023 ORDER PER BENCH : These appeals by the assessees are directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax for the concerned assessment years. 2. Since the issues are common and the appeals

COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTRE, JAINTY,ALMORA vs. ITO (TDS), HALDWANI

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessees are allowed for

263 601 (Uttarakhand). (PAN : MRTVO1826G) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : None REVENUE BY : Smt. Poonam Sharma, Addl. CIT DR Date of Hearing : 22.09.2023 Date of Order : 22.09.2023 ORDER PER BENCH : These appeals by the assessees are directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax for the concerned assessment years. 2. Since the issues are common and the appeals

VETERINARY HOSPITAL, LAMGARA,ALMORA vs. ITO(TDS), HALDWANI

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessees are allowed for

263 601 (Uttarakhand). (PAN : MRTVO1826G) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : None REVENUE BY : Smt. Poonam Sharma, Addl. CIT DR Date of Hearing : 22.09.2023 Date of Order : 22.09.2023 ORDER PER BENCH : These appeals by the assessees are directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax for the concerned assessment years. 2. Since the issues are common and the appeals

VETERINARY HOSPITAL, LAMGARA,ALMORA vs. ITO(TDS), HALDWANI

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessees are allowed for

263 601 (Uttarakhand). (PAN : MRTVO1826G) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : None REVENUE BY : Smt. Poonam Sharma, Addl. CIT DR Date of Hearing : 22.09.2023 Date of Order : 22.09.2023 ORDER PER BENCH : These appeals by the assessees are directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax for the concerned assessment years. 2. Since the issues are common and the appeals

VETERINARY HOSPITAL, LAMGARA,ALMORA vs. ITO(TDS), HALDWANI

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessees are allowed for

263 601 (Uttarakhand). (PAN : MRTVO1826G) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : None REVENUE BY : Smt. Poonam Sharma, Addl. CIT DR Date of Hearing : 22.09.2023 Date of Order : 22.09.2023 ORDER PER BENCH : These appeals by the assessees are directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax for the concerned assessment years. 2. Since the issues are common and the appeals

VETERINARY HOSPITAL, LAMGARA,ALMORA vs. ITO(TDS), HALDWANI

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessees are allowed for

263 601 (Uttarakhand). (PAN : MRTVO1826G) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : None REVENUE BY : Smt. Poonam Sharma, Addl. CIT DR Date of Hearing : 22.09.2023 Date of Order : 22.09.2023 ORDER PER BENCH : These appeals by the assessees are directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax for the concerned assessment years. 2. Since the issues are common and the appeals