MI OVERSEAS LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ADIT, DEHRADUN

In the result ITA number 5584/Del/2013 filed by the assessee for assessment year

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

3. The learned CIT(A) has erred in rejecting the Appellant‟s claim, wherein the Appellant had offered 2% of the revenues from offshore supply of imported materials from PSC and Non-PSC partners to tax following the assessment order for AY 2006-07, in order to avoid litigation and to buy peace of mind. 4. The learned

MI OVERSEAS LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ADIT, DEHRADUN

In the result ITA number 5584/Del/2013 filed by the assessee for assessment year

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

3. The learned CIT(A) has erred in rejecting the Appellant‟s claim, wherein the Appellant had offered 2% of the revenues from offshore supply of imported materials from PSC and Non-PSC partners to tax following the assessment order for AY 2006-07, in order to avoid litigation and to buy peace of mind. 4. The learned

ADIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), DEHRADUN vs. M/S. M.I, OVERSEAS LTD., MUMBAI

In the result ITA number 5584/Del/2013 filed by the assessee for assessment year

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

3. The learned CIT(A) has erred in rejecting the Appellant‟s claim, wherein the Appellant had offered 2% of the revenues from offshore supply of imported materials from PSC and Non-PSC partners to tax following the assessment order for AY 2006-07, in order to avoid litigation and to buy peace of mind. 4. The learned

MI OVERSEAS LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ADIT, DEHRADUN

In the result ITA number 5584/Del/2013 filed by the assessee for assessment year

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

3. The learned CIT(A) has erred in rejecting the Appellant‟s claim, wherein the Appellant had offered 2% of the revenues from offshore supply of imported materials from PSC and Non-PSC partners to tax following the assessment order for AY 2006-07, in order to avoid litigation and to buy peace of mind. 4. The learned

ADIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), DEHRADUN vs. M/S. M.I, OVERSEAS LTD., MUMBAI

In the result ITA number 5584/Del/2013 filed by the assessee for assessment year

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

3. The learned CIT(A) has erred in rejecting the Appellant‟s claim, wherein the Appellant had offered 2% of the revenues from offshore supply of imported materials from PSC and Non-PSC partners to tax following the assessment order for AY 2006-07, in order to avoid litigation and to buy peace of mind. 4. The learned

VETERINARY HOSPITAL, DHAULADEVI,ALMORA vs. ITO(TDS), HALDWANI

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessees are allowed for

TDS), Haldwani on 04.04.2018. This detail is corroborated from the Form 35 column 2 - band c wherein the Appellant has itself mentioned this detail. The matter was discussed with the counsel on phone today it was explained that prima facie a Notice u/s 226(3) of the LT. Act, 1961 cannot be challenged in appeal before CIT(A) in terms

CHIEF VERERINARY HOSPITAL, ALMORA,ALMORA vs. ITO(TDS), HALDWANI

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessees are allowed for

TDS), Haldwani on 04.04.2018. This detail is corroborated from the Form 35 column 2 - band c wherein the Appellant has itself mentioned this detail. The matter was discussed with the counsel on phone today it was explained that prima facie a Notice u/s 226(3) of the LT. Act, 1961 cannot be challenged in appeal before CIT(A) in terms

PT. HARGOVIND PANT DIST. HOSPITALS,ALMORA UK vs. ITO TDS- HALDWANI, UTTARAKHAND

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessees are allowed for

TDS), Haldwani on 04.04.2018. This detail is corroborated from the Form 35 column 2 - band c wherein the Appellant has itself mentioned this detail. The matter was discussed with the counsel on phone today it was explained that prima facie a Notice u/s 226(3) of the LT. Act, 1961 cannot be challenged in appeal before CIT(A) in terms

VETERINARY HOSPITAL, DHAULADEVI,ALMORA vs. ITO(TDS), HALDWANI

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessees are allowed for

TDS), Haldwani on 04.04.2018. This detail is corroborated from the Form 35 column 2 - band c wherein the Appellant has itself mentioned this detail. The matter was discussed with the counsel on phone today it was explained that prima facie a Notice u/s 226(3) of the LT. Act, 1961 cannot be challenged in appeal before CIT(A) in terms

COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTRE, JAINTY,ALMORA vs. ITO (TDS), HALDWANI

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessees are allowed for

TDS), Haldwani on 04.04.2018. This detail is corroborated from the Form 35 column 2 - band c wherein the Appellant has itself mentioned this detail. The matter was discussed with the counsel on phone today it was explained that prima facie a Notice u/s 226(3) of the LT. Act, 1961 cannot be challenged in appeal before CIT(A) in terms

VETERINARY HOSPITAL, LAMGARA,ALMORA vs. ITO(TDS), HALDWANI

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessees are allowed for

TDS), Haldwani on 04.04.2018. This detail is corroborated from the Form 35 column 2 - band c wherein the Appellant has itself mentioned this detail. The matter was discussed with the counsel on phone today it was explained that prima facie a Notice u/s 226(3) of the LT. Act, 1961 cannot be challenged in appeal before CIT(A) in terms

COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTRE, JAINTY,ALMORA vs. ITO (TDS), HALDWANI

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessees are allowed for

TDS), Haldwani on 04.04.2018. This detail is corroborated from the Form 35 column 2 - band c wherein the Appellant has itself mentioned this detail. The matter was discussed with the counsel on phone today it was explained that prima facie a Notice u/s 226(3) of the LT. Act, 1961 cannot be challenged in appeal before CIT(A) in terms

COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTRE, JAINTY,ALMORA vs. ITO (TDS), HALDWANI

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessees are allowed for

TDS), Haldwani on 04.04.2018. This detail is corroborated from the Form 35 column 2 - band c wherein the Appellant has itself mentioned this detail. The matter was discussed with the counsel on phone today it was explained that prima facie a Notice u/s 226(3) of the LT. Act, 1961 cannot be challenged in appeal before CIT(A) in terms

VETERINARY HOSPITAL, HAWALBAGH,ALMORA vs. ITO(TDS), HALDWANI

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessees are allowed for

TDS), Haldwani on 04.04.2018. This detail is corroborated from the Form 35 column 2 - band c wherein the Appellant has itself mentioned this detail. The matter was discussed with the counsel on phone today it was explained that prima facie a Notice u/s 226(3) of the LT. Act, 1961 cannot be challenged in appeal before CIT(A) in terms

VETERINARY HOSPITAL, LAMGARA,ALMORA vs. ITO(TDS), HALDWANI

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessees are allowed for

TDS), Haldwani on 04.04.2018. This detail is corroborated from the Form 35 column 2 - band c wherein the Appellant has itself mentioned this detail. The matter was discussed with the counsel on phone today it was explained that prima facie a Notice u/s 226(3) of the LT. Act, 1961 cannot be challenged in appeal before CIT(A) in terms

COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTRE, JAINTY,ALMORA vs. ITO (TDS), HALDWANI

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessees are allowed for

TDS), Haldwani on 04.04.2018. This detail is corroborated from the Form 35 column 2 - band c wherein the Appellant has itself mentioned this detail. The matter was discussed with the counsel on phone today it was explained that prima facie a Notice u/s 226(3) of the LT. Act, 1961 cannot be challenged in appeal before CIT(A) in terms

VETERINARY HOSPITAL, LAMGARA,ALMORA vs. ITO(TDS), HALDWANI

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessees are allowed for

TDS), Haldwani on 04.04.2018. This detail is corroborated from the Form 35 column 2 - band c wherein the Appellant has itself mentioned this detail. The matter was discussed with the counsel on phone today it was explained that prima facie a Notice u/s 226(3) of the LT. Act, 1961 cannot be challenged in appeal before CIT(A) in terms

VETERINARY HOSPITAL, LAMGARA,ALMORA vs. ITO(TDS), HALDWANI

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessees are allowed for

TDS), Haldwani on 04.04.2018. This detail is corroborated from the Form 35 column 2 - band c wherein the Appellant has itself mentioned this detail. The matter was discussed with the counsel on phone today it was explained that prima facie a Notice u/s 226(3) of the LT. Act, 1961 cannot be challenged in appeal before CIT(A) in terms