BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

64 results for “TDS”+ Section 2(14)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi4,027Mumbai3,969Bangalore2,073Chennai1,447Kolkata967Pune883Hyderabad758Ahmedabad754Indore617Jaipur472Raipur401Chandigarh375Cochin359Nagpur313Karnataka281Visakhapatnam248Surat246Cuttack205Rajkot157Amritsar107Lucknow106Jabalpur95Dehradun64Jodhpur61Ranchi54Agra53Guwahati47Allahabad46Patna45Panaji43Telangana40SC19Varanasi14Calcutta12Kerala12Himachal Pradesh8Rajasthan6Uttarakhand3Punjab & Haryana3Orissa2J&K2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 44B180Section 200A112Section 234E40Section 143(3)30Section 44D28Addition to Income23TDS17Deduction16Section 915Section 271C

DR. VIRENDRA SWAROOP EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION,KANPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 211/DDN/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun16 Jan 2026AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S & Shri Manish Agarwal[Through Virtual Mode] [Assessment Year : 2023-24] Dr. Virendra Swaroop Vs Acit Educational Foundation Central Circle 15/96, Civil Lines, Kanpur Dehradun Uttar Pradesh-208001 Pan-Aaajd0224D Appellant Respondent Assessee By Shri Salil Kapoor, Adv. Shri Rajiv Sahni, Ca Shri Sumit Lal Chandanim, Adv. Shri Shivam Yadav, Adv. & Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Adv. Revenue By Ms. Poonam Sharma, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 11.12.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 16.01.2026 Order Per Manish Agarwal, Am : The Present Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 16.09.2025 By Ld. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Kanpur [“Pcit”] Passed U/S 12(Ab)(4)(Ii) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961[“The Act”] Cancelling The Registration Granted U/S 12A Of The Act From Assessment Year 2023-24 & Onwards.

Section 11Section 12Section 127Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 132Section 143(3)

2. That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the order passed by PCIT under section 12AB(4)(ii) of the Act cancelling the registration of the Appellant trust is illegal, bad in law and without jurisdiction. 3. That the reference made by the Assessing Officer ('AO') under the second proviso to Section 143(3) read

Showing 1–20 of 64 · Page 1 of 4

13
Section 153C12
Exemption11

CHIEF EDUCATION OFFICER,DEHRADUN vs. CIT(A), DEHRADUN

ITA 46/DDN/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun27 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra(Through Video Conferencing)

Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

2. The learned counsel appearing on either side would submit that the Judgment of this Court reported in 2023 (10) TMI 1141 [ M/s. True Blue Voice India Private Ltd., and another Vs. the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax - TDS, Chennai and others] would squarely apply to the facts of the present case. 3. The relevant portion of the said Judgment

CHIEF EDUCATION OFFICER,DEHRADUN vs. CIT(A), DEHRADUN

ITA 48/DDN/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun27 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra(Through Video Conferencing)

Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

2. The learned counsel appearing on either side would submit that the Judgment of this Court reported in 2023 (10) TMI 1141 [ M/s. True Blue Voice India Private Ltd., and another Vs. the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax - TDS, Chennai and others] would squarely apply to the facts of the present case. 3. The relevant portion of the said Judgment

CHIEF EDUCATION OFFICER,DEHRADUN vs. CIT(A), DEHRADUN

ITA 45/DDN/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun27 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra(Through Video Conferencing)

Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

2. The learned counsel appearing on either side would submit that the Judgment of this Court reported in 2023 (10) TMI 1141 [ M/s. True Blue Voice India Private Ltd., and another Vs. the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax - TDS, Chennai and others] would squarely apply to the facts of the present case. 3. The relevant portion of the said Judgment

CHIEF EDUCATION OFFICER,DEHRADUN vs. CIT(A), DEHRADUN

ITA 50/DDN/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun27 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra(Through Video Conferencing)

Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

2. The learned counsel appearing on either side would submit that the Judgment of this Court reported in 2023 (10) TMI 1141 [ M/s. True Blue Voice India Private Ltd., and another Vs. the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax - TDS, Chennai and others] would squarely apply to the facts of the present case. 3. The relevant portion of the said Judgment

CHIEF EDUCATION OFFICER,DEHRADUN vs. CIT(A), DEHRADUN

ITA 51/DDN/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun27 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra(Through Video Conferencing)

Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

2. The learned counsel appearing on either side would submit that the Judgment of this Court reported in 2023 (10) TMI 1141 [ M/s. True Blue Voice India Private Ltd., and another Vs. the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax - TDS, Chennai and others] would squarely apply to the facts of the present case. 3. The relevant portion of the said Judgment

CIT(A), DEHRADUN vs. CHIEF EDUCATION OFFICER, DEHRADUN

ITA 47/DDN/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun27 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra(Through Video Conferencing)

Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

2. The learned counsel appearing on either side would submit that the Judgment of this Court reported in 2023 (10) TMI 1141 [ M/s. True Blue Voice India Private Ltd., and another Vs. the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax - TDS, Chennai and others] would squarely apply to the facts of the present case. 3. The relevant portion of the said Judgment

CHIEF EDUCATION OFFICER,DEHRADUN vs. CIT (A), DEHRADUN

ITA 44/DDN/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun27 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra(Through Video Conferencing)

Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

2. The learned counsel appearing on either side would submit that the Judgment of this Court reported in 2023 (10) TMI 1141 [ M/s. True Blue Voice India Private Ltd., and another Vs. the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax - TDS, Chennai and others] would squarely apply to the facts of the present case. 3. The relevant portion of the said Judgment

CHIEF EDUCATION OFFICER,DEHRADUN vs. CIT (AI, DEHRADUN

ITA 49/DDN/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun27 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra(Through Video Conferencing)

Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

2. The learned counsel appearing on either side would submit that the Judgment of this Court reported in 2023 (10) TMI 1141 [ M/s. True Blue Voice India Private Ltd., and another Vs. the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax - TDS, Chennai and others] would squarely apply to the facts of the present case. 3. The relevant portion of the said Judgment

SCHLUMBERGER ASIA SERVICES LTD.,GURGAON vs. DDIT, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 6437/DEL/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun05 May 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri C.N. Prasad[Assessment Year: 2011-12] Schlumberger Asia Services Deputy Director Of Income Tax Limited, (International Taxation), 14Th Floor, Tower C, Building Dehradun No.1, Dlf City, Phase Ii, Gurgaon-122002 Pan-Aadcs1107J Assessee Revenue [Assessment Year: 2011-12] Deputy Director Of Income Tax Schlumberger Asia Services (International Taxation), Limited, Dehradun 14Th Floor, Tower C, Building No.1, Dlf City, Phase Ii, Gurgaon-122002 Pan- Aadcs1107J Revenue Assessee Assessee By Sh. Salil Kapoor, Adv. Ms. Ananya Kappor & Ms. Soumya Singh, Adv. Revenue By Sh. T.S.Mapwal, Sr.Dr

Section 143(3)Section 44BSection 44DSection 9

TDS has not been given. The Id. AO must do so at the time of giving effect to this order. 10. Ground no. 9 challenges the levy of interest u/s 234B of the Act. This ground is allowed following the case of Maersk reported in 334 ITR 79 (UK). 11. Ground nos. 10 and 11 challenge the initiation of penalty

DCIT, CIRCLE- I, INTL. TAXATION, DEHRADUN vs. DEEPWATER PACIFIC 1 INC., DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 6001/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun22 Nov 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Amit Arora, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. N.S.Jangpangi, CIT-DR
Section 44B

2) read with Section 44 BB (1). The service tax is not an amount paid or payable, or received or deemed to be received by the Assessee for the services rendered by it. The Assessee is only collecting the service tax for passing it on to the government. 14 ITA No.6001.Del.2017 Deepwater Pacific 1 Inc. 20. The Court further

DCIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION),CIRCLE-2, DEHRADUN vs. TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL VENTURE LTD., NOIDA

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 6174/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun22 Nov 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukladr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Amit Arora, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. T.S.Mapwal, Sr. DR
Section 44B

14. In Chowringhee Sales Bureau (supra) sales tax in the sum of Rs. 32,986 was collected and kept by the Assessee in a separate 8 ITA No.6174, 6175.Del.2017 Transocean Offshore ‘sales tax collection account’. The question considered by the Supreme Court was: ‘Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case

DCIT, CIRCLE- 1, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, DEHRADUN vs. TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE DEEPWATER DRILLING INC, DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 6175/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun22 Nov 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amit Shukladr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Amit Arora, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. T.S.Mapwal, Sr. DR
Section 44B

14. In Chowringhee Sales Bureau (supra) sales tax in the sum of Rs. 32,986 was collected and kept by the Assessee in a separate 8 ITA No.6174, 6175.Del.2017 Transocean Offshore ‘sales tax collection account’. The question considered by the Supreme Court was: ‘Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case

DCIT, CIRCLE- II, (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), DEHRADUN vs. SUNDOWNER OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL (BERMUDA) LTD., DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 4643/DEL/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun22 Nov 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Amit Arora, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. N.S. Jangpangi, CIT-DR
Section 44B

14. In Chowringhee Sales Bureau (supra) sales tax in the sum of Rs. 32,986 was collected and kept by the Assessee in a separate ‘sales tax collection account’. The question considered by the Supreme Court was: ‘Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the sum of Rs. 32,986 had been validly excluded from

DCIT, CIRCLE- II, INTL. TAXATION, DEHRADUN vs. R & B FALCON (A) PTY LTD., DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 4641/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun24 Nov 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Amit Arora, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. T.S.Mapwal, Sr. DR
Section 44B

2) read with Section 44 BB (1). The service tax is not an amount paid or payable, or received or deemed to be received by the Assessee for the services rendered by it. The Assessee is only collecting the service tax for passing it on to the government. 14 ITA No.4641, 4642.Del.2017 R & B Falcon

DCIT, CIRCLE- II, INTL. TAXATION, DEHRADUN vs. R & B FALCON (A) PTY LTD., DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 4642/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun24 Nov 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Amit Arora, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. T.S.Mapwal, Sr. DR
Section 44B

2) read with Section 44 BB (1). The service tax is not an amount paid or payable, or received or deemed to be received by the Assessee for the services rendered by it. The Assessee is only collecting the service tax for passing it on to the government. 14 ITA No.4641, 4642.Del.2017 R & B Falcon

DCIT, CIRCLE-II, INTL. TAXATION, DEHRADUN vs. TRITON HOLDINGS LTD., DEHRADUNA

In the result, appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 4639/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun12 Nov 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Amit Arora, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. T.S. Mapwal, Sr. DR
Section 234BSection 44B

14 ITA No.4639, 4640.Del.2017 M/s. Triton Holdings Limited The Supreme Court considered its earlier decision in Chowringhee Sales Bureau (supra) and answered the question in the negative. The Supreme Court noted that for the purposes of computing the ‘total turnover’ for the purpose of Section 80 HHC (3) brokerage, commission, interest etc. did not form part of the business

DCIT, CIRCLE-II, INTL. TAXATION, DEHRADUN vs. TRITON HOLDINGS LTD., DEHRADUNA

In the result, appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 4640/DEL/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun12 Nov 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Amit Arora, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. T.S. Mapwal, Sr. DR
Section 234BSection 44B

14 ITA No.4639, 4640.Del.2017 M/s. Triton Holdings Limited The Supreme Court considered its earlier decision in Chowringhee Sales Bureau (supra) and answered the question in the negative. The Supreme Court noted that for the purposes of computing the ‘total turnover’ for the purpose of Section 80 HHC (3) brokerage, commission, interest etc. did not form part of the business

DCIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION),CIRCLE-2, DEHRADUN vs. TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL VENTURE LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 4653/DEL/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun12 Nov 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Amit Arora, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Narendra Singh Jangpangi, CIT- DR
Section 44B

14 for the purposes of computing the ‘presumptive income’ of the Assessee under Section 44 BB of the Act. 16. The Court concurs with the decision of the High Court of Uttarakhand in DIT v. Schlumberger Asia Services Ltd (supra) which held that the reimbursement received by the Assessee of the customs duty paid on equipment imported

SHERWATER GEOSERVICES LTD. INDIA PROJECT OFFICE,DEHRADUN vs. AICT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE-2, DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 6/DDN/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun27 Oct 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Sanjay Aggarwal, CAFor Respondent: Sh. A. S. Rana, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 44B

14. In the considered view of the Court, both the aforementioned decisions were rendered in the specific contexts in which the questions arose before the Court. In other words the interpretation placed by the Court on the expression “trading receipt’ or ‘turnover’ in the said decisions was determined by the context. The later decision of the Supreme Court