CIT(A), DEHRADUN vs. CHIEF EDUCATION OFFICER, DEHRADUN

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra(Through Video Conferencing)

TDS statement under Section 200A of he Act. Thus, the said sub-Section 200A(1)(c) of the Act was came to be inserted with effect from 01.06.2015. 14

CHIEF EDUCATION OFFICER,DEHRADUN vs. CIT (A), DEHRADUN

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra(Through Video Conferencing)

TDS statement under Section 200A of he Act. Thus, the said sub-Section 200A(1)(c) of the Act was came to be inserted with effect from 01.06.2015. 14

CHIEF EDUCATION OFFICER,DEHRADUN vs. CIT(A), DEHRADUN

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra(Through Video Conferencing)

TDS statement under Section 200A of he Act. Thus, the said sub-Section 200A(1)(c) of the Act was came to be inserted with effect from 01.06.2015. 14

CHIEF EDUCATION OFFICER,DEHRADUN vs. CIT(A), DEHRADUN

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra(Through Video Conferencing)

TDS statement under Section 200A of he Act. Thus, the said sub-Section 200A(1)(c) of the Act was came to be inserted with effect from 01.06.2015. 14

CHIEF EDUCATION OFFICER,DEHRADUN vs. CIT (AI, DEHRADUN

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra(Through Video Conferencing)

TDS statement under Section 200A of he Act. Thus, the said sub-Section 200A(1)(c) of the Act was came to be inserted with effect from 01.06.2015. 14

CHIEF EDUCATION OFFICER,DEHRADUN vs. CIT(A), DEHRADUN

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra(Through Video Conferencing)

TDS statement under Section 200A of he Act. Thus, the said sub-Section 200A(1)(c) of the Act was came to be inserted with effect from 01.06.2015. 14

YES BANK LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ADDL. CIT (TDS), DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 7498/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Ita No. 7499/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15

TDS should be deducted on the interest payment made to UEPPCB. b) Copy of a letter dated 21 September 2012 (copy enclosed at pages 34 to 35 of the paper book) received from UEPPCB informing the Bank to issue the Fixed Deposit to UEPPCB and reiterating that as UEPPCB is a Government entity, no IDS should be deducted

YES BANK LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ADDL. CIT (TDS), DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 7498/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Ita No. 7499/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15

TDS should be deducted on the interest payment made to UEPPCB. b) Copy of a letter dated 21 September 2012 (copy enclosed at pages 34 to 35 of the paper book) received from UEPPCB informing the Bank to issue the Fixed Deposit to UEPPCB and reiterating that as UEPPCB is a Government entity, no IDS should be deducted

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DEHRADUN vs. HALLIBURTON OFF SHORE SERVICES INC , MAHARASHTRA

In the result, ground no.3 is allowed

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar Us & Shri Sanjay Awasthiआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.241/Ddn/2025 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2021-22 बनाम Dy. Commissioner Of Income Halliburton Off Shore Services Inc.,Unit No.603, 6Th Floor, Tax, Vs. Aayakar Bhawan, 13-A, Subhash Satellite Gazebo, East Wing,Guru Road, Hargovindji Marg,Andheri Mumbai, Navi Dehradun, Uttarakhand. Mumbai,Maharashtra. Pan No.Aaach5154M अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

section of TDS has been put to rest by the Hon’ble jurisdictional Uttarakhand HC vide its order in the case of CIT v. Samsung Heavy Industries Company Limited(supra). Therefore, respectfully following the judicial ratio laid down by the jurisdictional High Court, disallowance of Rs.4,47,53,145/- is deleted. The ground of appeal is allowed in favor

DCIT, CIRCLE- I, INTL. TAXATION, DEHRADUN vs. DEEPWATER PACIFIC 1 INC., DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

14 ITA No.6001.Del.2017 Deepwater Pacific 1 Inc. 20. The Court further notes that the position has been made explicit by the CBDT itself in two of its circulars. In Circular No. 4/2008 dated 28th April 2008 it was clarified that “Service tax paid by the tenant doesn't partake the nature of "income" of the landlord. The landlord only

DCIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION),CIRCLE-2, DEHRADUN vs. TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL VENTURE LTD., NOIDA

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Amit Shukladr. B.R.R. Kumar

14. In Chowringhee Sales Bureau (supra) sales tax in the sum of Rs. 32,986 was collected and kept by the Assessee in a separate 8 ITA No.6174, 6175.Del.2017 Transocean Offshore ‘sales tax collection account’. The question considered by the Supreme Court was: ‘Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case

DCIT, CIRCLE- II, (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), DEHRADUN vs. SUNDOWNER OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL (BERMUDA) LTD., DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

14. In Chowringhee Sales Bureau (supra) sales tax in the sum of Rs. 32,986 was collected and kept by the Assessee in a separate ‘sales tax collection account’. The question considered by the Supreme Court was: ‘Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the sum of Rs. 32,986 had been validly excluded from

DCIT, CIRCLE- 1, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, DEHRADUN vs. TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE DEEPWATER DRILLING INC, DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Amit Shukladr. B.R.R. Kumar

14. In Chowringhee Sales Bureau (supra) sales tax in the sum of Rs. 32,986 was collected and kept by the Assessee in a separate 8 ITA No.6174, 6175.Del.2017 Transocean Offshore ‘sales tax collection account’. The question considered by the Supreme Court was: ‘Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case

MI OVERSEAS LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ADIT, DEHRADUN

In the result ITA number 5584/Del/2013 filed by the assessee for assessment year

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

14 May 2013 was partly allowed. Both the parties are aggrieved with that order and therefore are in appeal. 61. The learned AO has raised the following grounds of appeal in ITA No. 5565/Del/2012 for the Assessment Year 2010-11:- “1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld CIT(A) has erred in holding that

MI OVERSEAS LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ADIT, DEHRADUN

In the result ITA number 5584/Del/2013 filed by the assessee for assessment year

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

14 May 2013 was partly allowed. Both the parties are aggrieved with that order and therefore are in appeal. 61. The learned AO has raised the following grounds of appeal in ITA No. 5565/Del/2012 for the Assessment Year 2010-11:- “1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld CIT(A) has erred in holding that

MI OVERSEAS LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ADIT, DEHRADUN

In the result ITA number 5584/Del/2013 filed by the assessee for assessment year

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

14 May 2013 was partly allowed. Both the parties are aggrieved with that order and therefore are in appeal. 61. The learned AO has raised the following grounds of appeal in ITA No. 5565/Del/2012 for the Assessment Year 2010-11:- “1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld CIT(A) has erred in holding that

ADIT, DEHRADUN vs. M/S. M.I. OVERSEAS LTD., NOIDA

In the result ITA number 5584/Del/2013 filed by the assessee for assessment year

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

14 May 2013 was partly allowed. Both the parties are aggrieved with that order and therefore are in appeal. 61. The learned AO has raised the following grounds of appeal in ITA No. 5565/Del/2012 for the Assessment Year 2010-11:- “1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld CIT(A) has erred in holding that

MI OVERSEAS LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ADIT, DEHRADUN

In the result ITA number 5584/Del/2013 filed by the assessee for assessment year

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

14 May 2013 was partly allowed. Both the parties are aggrieved with that order and therefore are in appeal. 61. The learned AO has raised the following grounds of appeal in ITA No. 5565/Del/2012 for the Assessment Year 2010-11:- “1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld CIT(A) has erred in holding that