BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

40 results for “TDS”+ Section 10(25)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,754Delhi2,739Bangalore1,511Chennai1,004Kolkata615Hyderabad405Pune364Ahmedabad356Indore252Jaipur251Raipur223Chandigarh221Karnataka191Cochin191Surat108Nagpur95Rajkot73Lucknow72Visakhapatnam69Cuttack65Amritsar44Dehradun40Jodhpur37Guwahati36Ranchi35Allahabad25Agra24Telangana24Panaji21Patna19SC12Jabalpur11Varanasi9Kerala9Calcutta6Rajasthan4Uttarakhand2Himachal Pradesh1Orissa1Bombay1

Key Topics

Section 44B105Section 44D28Section 194A23Addition to Income18Section 143(3)16Section 915Deduction11TDS11Section 44A10Section 12A

DR. VIRENDRA SWAROOP EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION,KANPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 211/DDN/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun16 Jan 2026AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S & Shri Manish Agarwal[Through Virtual Mode] [Assessment Year : 2023-24] Dr. Virendra Swaroop Vs Acit Educational Foundation Central Circle 15/96, Civil Lines, Kanpur Dehradun Uttar Pradesh-208001 Pan-Aaajd0224D Appellant Respondent Assessee By Shri Salil Kapoor, Adv. Shri Rajiv Sahni, Ca Shri Sumit Lal Chandanim, Adv. Shri Shivam Yadav, Adv. & Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Adv. Revenue By Ms. Poonam Sharma, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 11.12.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 16.01.2026 Order Per Manish Agarwal, Am : The Present Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 16.09.2025 By Ld. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Kanpur [“Pcit”] Passed U/S 12(Ab)(4)(Ii) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961[“The Act”] Cancelling The Registration Granted U/S 12A Of The Act From Assessment Year 2023-24 & Onwards.

Section 11Section 12Section 127Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 132Section 143(3)

25,22,633/-. Based on the information supplied by the Ao, the ld. PCIT, Central, Kanpur initiated the proceedings for cancellation of registration 12A granted to it and after considering the submissions made, the ld. PCIT concluded that the assessee trust is extensively involved in the business of real estate, land transactions and leasing business during the year under consideration

Showing 1–20 of 40 · Page 1 of 2

8
Section 9(1)(vii)8
Disallowance8

YES BANK LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ADDL. CIT (TDS), DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 7498/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun15 Dec 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 7498/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Ita No. 7499/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt. Mayank Prabha Tomar, Addl. CIT
Section 194ASection 194A(3)(iii)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271Section 271CSection 274Section 4

25, of the paper book. 3) Section 194A-relates to the provisions for deducting tax at source on the payment; of interest other than 'interest on securities'. Attention is invited to the provisions of section 194A(3)(iii) (f) which interalia provides as under:- "The provisions of sub-section (1) to section 194A shall not apply - to such income credited

YES BANK LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ADDL. CIT (TDS), DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 7499/DEL/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun15 Dec 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 7498/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Ita No. 7499/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt. Mayank Prabha Tomar, Addl. CIT
Section 194ASection 194A(3)(iii)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271Section 271CSection 274Section 4

25, of the paper book. 3) Section 194A-relates to the provisions for deducting tax at source on the payment; of interest other than 'interest on securities'. Attention is invited to the provisions of section 194A(3)(iii) (f) which interalia provides as under:- "The provisions of sub-section (1) to section 194A shall not apply - to such income credited

JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SUBHASH ROAD DEHADUN vs. M/S TIMES SQUARE, SAHASTRADHARA ROAD

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 42/DDN/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun26 Sept 2025AY 2017-18
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 43CSection 69A

25,14,952/- available with the assessee as on the\nclosing hours on 08.11.2016 out of which 2,24,34,000/-were\ndeposited in SBN during the period of demonetization. He submits\nthat books of accounts of the assessee are duly audited, and no\ndefect was pointed out by AO. Ld. AR submits that monthly cash\nflow statement was also

MB PETROLEUM SERVICES LLC,MUMBAI vs. DDIT, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1828/DEL/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun15 Sept 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri M. Balaganeshmb Petroleum Services Llc, Vs. Ddit, Kirtane & Pandit, H-16, Circle-1, Saraswati Colony, Sitaldevi International Taxation, Temple Road, Mahim, Dehradun Mumbai (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaecm2604H

For Appellant: Smt Shashi M. Kapila, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Mayank Kumar, JCIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 32Section 44B

10% on gross receipts actually, then still its income would be determined only in terms of section 44BB(1) of the Act. There is absolutely no scope for determining income of the assessee under normal provisions of the Act. This is so because of non obstante clause provided u/s 44BB of the Act which reads as under:- “Special provision

M.B. PETROLEUM SERVICES LLC,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 6608/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun05 Oct 2023AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Smt. Shashi M Kapila, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Mayank Kumar, Addl.CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 246ASection 271GSection 40aSection 44BSection 44D

TDS has been deducted”. (Disallowance of Rs. 10,78,358/-) 5 ITA No.6608/Del./2016 (iii) The assessee's written submission vide their reply dated 16.11.2015, with regard to disallowance made as per para 5.1 of the draft assessment order regarding "Depreciation and Amortization expenses" of Rs.49,86,844/-, has been perused and found not acceptable. The assessee could not prove

PANJAB NATIONAL BANK,DEHRADUN vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS) , DEHRADUN

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 13/DDN/2020[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun06 Aug 2021AY 2014-2015

Bench: Sh. Amit Shukladr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 10/Ddn/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2011-12 Ita No. 11/Ddn/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2012-13 Ita No. 12/Ddn/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2013-14 Ita No. 13/Ddn/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2014-15 Ita No. 14/Ddn/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2015-16 Punjab National Bank, Vs Acit(Tds), Subhash Road Branch, Dehradun Dehradun (Appellantt (Respondent) Pan No. Mrtp02168F Assessee By : Sh. Vimal Kishore, Ca Revenue By : Sh. N. C. Upadhyaya, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 12.07.2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 06.08.2021

For Appellant: Sh. Vimal Kishore, CAFor Respondent: Sh. N. C. Upadhyaya, Sr. DR
Section 10Section 10(25)Section 139Section 154Section 194Section 194ASection 194A(3)(f)Section 201(1)

10(25) was not liable to file return of income u/s 139 of the Act. The learned CIT (Appeal) rejected the alternate claim of the appellant to take on record form 26A prescribed under rule 31ACB for the purpose of first proviso to section 201(1) only because the return of income was not filed by the Uttarakhand Co-operative

PANJAB NATIONAL BANK,DEHRADUN vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), DEHRADUN

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 11/DDN/2020[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun06 Aug 2021AY 2012-2013

Bench: Sh. Amit Shukladr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 10/Ddn/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2011-12 Ita No. 11/Ddn/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2012-13 Ita No. 12/Ddn/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2013-14 Ita No. 13/Ddn/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2014-15 Ita No. 14/Ddn/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2015-16 Punjab National Bank, Vs Acit(Tds), Subhash Road Branch, Dehradun Dehradun (Appellantt (Respondent) Pan No. Mrtp02168F Assessee By : Sh. Vimal Kishore, Ca Revenue By : Sh. N. C. Upadhyaya, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 12.07.2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 06.08.2021

For Appellant: Sh. Vimal Kishore, CAFor Respondent: Sh. N. C. Upadhyaya, Sr. DR
Section 10Section 10(25)Section 139Section 154Section 194Section 194ASection 194A(3)(f)Section 201(1)

10(25) was not liable to file return of income u/s 139 of the Act. The learned CIT (Appeal) rejected the alternate claim of the appellant to take on record form 26A prescribed under rule 31ACB for the purpose of first proviso to section 201(1) only because the return of income was not filed by the Uttarakhand Co-operative

PANJAB NATIONAL BANK,DEHRADUN vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), DEHRADUN

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 10/DDN/2020[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun06 Aug 2021AY 2011-2012

Bench: Sh. Amit Shukladr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 10/Ddn/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2011-12 Ita No. 11/Ddn/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2012-13 Ita No. 12/Ddn/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2013-14 Ita No. 13/Ddn/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2014-15 Ita No. 14/Ddn/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2015-16 Punjab National Bank, Vs Acit(Tds), Subhash Road Branch, Dehradun Dehradun (Appellantt (Respondent) Pan No. Mrtp02168F Assessee By : Sh. Vimal Kishore, Ca Revenue By : Sh. N. C. Upadhyaya, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 12.07.2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 06.08.2021

For Appellant: Sh. Vimal Kishore, CAFor Respondent: Sh. N. C. Upadhyaya, Sr. DR
Section 10Section 10(25)Section 139Section 154Section 194Section 194ASection 194A(3)(f)Section 201(1)

10(25) was not liable to file return of income u/s 139 of the Act. The learned CIT (Appeal) rejected the alternate claim of the appellant to take on record form 26A prescribed under rule 31ACB for the purpose of first proviso to section 201(1) only because the return of income was not filed by the Uttarakhand Co-operative

PANJAB NATIONAL BANK,DEHRADUN vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), DEHRADUN

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 12/DDN/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun06 Aug 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. Amit Shukladr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 10/Ddn/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2011-12 Ita No. 11/Ddn/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2012-13 Ita No. 12/Ddn/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2013-14 Ita No. 13/Ddn/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2014-15 Ita No. 14/Ddn/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2015-16 Punjab National Bank, Vs Acit(Tds), Subhash Road Branch, Dehradun Dehradun (Appellantt (Respondent) Pan No. Mrtp02168F Assessee By : Sh. Vimal Kishore, Ca Revenue By : Sh. N. C. Upadhyaya, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 12.07.2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 06.08.2021

For Appellant: Sh. Vimal Kishore, CAFor Respondent: Sh. N. C. Upadhyaya, Sr. DR
Section 10Section 10(25)Section 139Section 154Section 194Section 194ASection 194A(3)(f)Section 201(1)

10(25) was not liable to file return of income u/s 139 of the Act. The learned CIT (Appeal) rejected the alternate claim of the appellant to take on record form 26A prescribed under rule 31ACB for the purpose of first proviso to section 201(1) only because the return of income was not filed by the Uttarakhand Co-operative

PANJAB NATIONAL BANK,DEHRADUN vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), DEHRADUN

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 14/DDN/2020[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun06 Aug 2021AY 2015-2016

Bench: Sh. Amit Shukladr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 10/Ddn/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2011-12 Ita No. 11/Ddn/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2012-13 Ita No. 12/Ddn/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2013-14 Ita No. 13/Ddn/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2014-15 Ita No. 14/Ddn/2020 : Asstt. Year: 2015-16 Punjab National Bank, Vs Acit(Tds), Subhash Road Branch, Dehradun Dehradun (Appellantt (Respondent) Pan No. Mrtp02168F Assessee By : Sh. Vimal Kishore, Ca Revenue By : Sh. N. C. Upadhyaya, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 12.07.2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 06.08.2021

For Appellant: Sh. Vimal Kishore, CAFor Respondent: Sh. N. C. Upadhyaya, Sr. DR
Section 10Section 10(25)Section 139Section 154Section 194Section 194ASection 194A(3)(f)Section 201(1)

10(25) was not liable to file return of income u/s 139 of the Act. The learned CIT (Appeal) rejected the alternate claim of the appellant to take on record form 26A prescribed under rule 31ACB for the purpose of first proviso to section 201(1) only because the return of income was not filed by the Uttarakhand Co-operative

DCIT, CIRCLE- 1, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, DEHRADUN vs. TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE DEEPWATER DRILLING INC, DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 6175/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun22 Nov 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amit Shukladr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Amit Arora, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. T.S.Mapwal, Sr. DR
Section 44B

25 .11.2021 2 ITA No.6174, 6175.Del.2017 Transocean Offshore O R D E R PER B.R.R.KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER : Both appeals have been filed by the revenue against the order of the ld. CIT(A)-2, Noida, dated 27.07.2017. 2. The only issue involved in this case is that whether service tax is includable in the gross revenue for computing profits

DCIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION),CIRCLE-2, DEHRADUN vs. TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL VENTURE LTD., NOIDA

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 6174/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun22 Nov 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukladr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Amit Arora, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. T.S.Mapwal, Sr. DR
Section 44B

25 .11.2021 2 ITA No.6174, 6175.Del.2017 Transocean Offshore O R D E R PER B.R.R.KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER : Both appeals have been filed by the revenue against the order of the ld. CIT(A)-2, Noida, dated 27.07.2017. 2. The only issue involved in this case is that whether service tax is includable in the gross revenue for computing profits

SMITH INTERNATIONAL INC.,MUMBAI vs. ADIT, DEHRADUN

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed and both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 4561/DEL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun10 Nov 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Sh. Amit Shukladr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 4561/Del/2013 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Ita No. 3824/Del/2014 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Smith International Inc., Vs Adit, 806-807, Powai Plaza, Central International Taxation, Avenue, Hiranandani Garden, Dehradun Powai, Mumbai-400076 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aahcs3148R

For Appellant: Sh. Salil Kapoor, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. T. S. Mapwal, Sr. DR
Section 115ASection 143Section 293ASection 42Section 44ASection 44BSection 44D

10. We have perused the record before us and the rationale of the ld. CIT(A). The ld. CIT(A) held that the distinction between PSC and non-PSC partners for deciding whether a receipt would be assessed u/s 44BB or as FTS or Royalty does not have the support of law or for that matters any judicial authority. Thus

ADIT, DEHRADUN vs. M/S. SMITH INTERNATIONAL INC., DEHRADUN

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed and both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 4651/DEL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun10 Nov 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Sh. Amit Shukladr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 4561/Del/2013 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Ita No. 3824/Del/2014 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Smith International Inc., Vs Adit, 806-807, Powai Plaza, Central International Taxation, Avenue, Hiranandani Garden, Dehradun Powai, Mumbai-400076 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aahcs3148R

For Appellant: Sh. Salil Kapoor, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. T. S. Mapwal, Sr. DR
Section 115ASection 143Section 293ASection 42Section 44ASection 44BSection 44D

10. We have perused the record before us and the rationale of the ld. CIT(A). The ld. CIT(A) held that the distinction between PSC and non-PSC partners for deciding whether a receipt would be assessed u/s 44BB or as FTS or Royalty does not have the support of law or for that matters any judicial authority. Thus

SMITH INTERNATIONAL INC.,MUMBAI vs. ADIT, DEHRADUN

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed and both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 3824/DEL/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun10 Nov 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. Amit Shukladr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 4561/Del/2013 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Ita No. 3824/Del/2014 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Smith International Inc., Vs Adit, 806-807, Powai Plaza, Central International Taxation, Avenue, Hiranandani Garden, Dehradun Powai, Mumbai-400076 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aahcs3148R

For Appellant: Sh. Salil Kapoor, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. T. S. Mapwal, Sr. DR
Section 115ASection 143Section 293ASection 42Section 44ASection 44BSection 44D

10. We have perused the record before us and the rationale of the ld. CIT(A). The ld. CIT(A) held that the distinction between PSC and non-PSC partners for deciding whether a receipt would be assessed u/s 44BB or as FTS or Royalty does not have the support of law or for that matters any judicial authority. Thus

DDIT, DEHRADUN vs. M/S. SMITH INTERNATIONAL INC., DEHRADUN

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed and both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 3909/DEL/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun10 Nov 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. Amit Shukladr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 4561/Del/2013 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Ita No. 3824/Del/2014 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Smith International Inc., Vs Adit, 806-807, Powai Plaza, Central International Taxation, Avenue, Hiranandani Garden, Dehradun Powai, Mumbai-400076 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aahcs3148R

For Appellant: Sh. Salil Kapoor, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. T. S. Mapwal, Sr. DR
Section 115ASection 143Section 293ASection 42Section 44ASection 44BSection 44D

10. We have perused the record before us and the rationale of the ld. CIT(A). The ld. CIT(A) held that the distinction between PSC and non-PSC partners for deciding whether a receipt would be assessed u/s 44BB or as FTS or Royalty does not have the support of law or for that matters any judicial authority. Thus

SCHLUMBERGER ASIA SERVICES LTD.,GURGAON vs. DDIT, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 6437/DEL/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun05 May 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri C.N. Prasad[Assessment Year: 2011-12] Schlumberger Asia Services Deputy Director Of Income Tax Limited, (International Taxation), 14Th Floor, Tower C, Building Dehradun No.1, Dlf City, Phase Ii, Gurgaon-122002 Pan-Aadcs1107J Assessee Revenue [Assessment Year: 2011-12] Deputy Director Of Income Tax Schlumberger Asia Services (International Taxation), Limited, Dehradun 14Th Floor, Tower C, Building No.1, Dlf City, Phase Ii, Gurgaon-122002 Pan- Aadcs1107J Revenue Assessee Assessee By Sh. Salil Kapoor, Adv. Ms. Ananya Kappor & Ms. Soumya Singh, Adv. Revenue By Sh. T.S.Mapwal, Sr.Dr

Section 143(3)Section 44BSection 44DSection 9

25% as against said income offered to tax under section 44BB of the Act in the ROI; iii. Receipts on account of reimbursement of service tax from PSC and Non-PSC included in the revenue chargeable to tax (under section 44BB and section 44DA respectively depending on the stream of income) as opposed to not chargeable to tax claimed

ACIT, CIRCLE- 2, DEHRADUN vs. RAJESH BALLABH, DEHRADUN

In the result appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 44/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun19 Jan 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri R.K.Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Chary

Section 194CSection 201Section 40Section 44A

TDS under section 194C, whereas w.e.f. 1/6/2015 the transport suppliers shall also furnish a declaration that he owns less than 10 carriages at any time during the Page 4 of 8 financial year relevant to the assessment year. Further the provision as applicable up to 31/5/2015 does not bar the exemption to small or large transport operators and is only

SUNIL SRIVASTAVA,HALDWANI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1)(3), HALDWANI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 10/DDN/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun15 Sept 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Him From Time To Time

Section 10(38)Section 143(3)Section 206CSection 44A

25-08-2015 Payment 10,00,000-00 Hld. To 554-KNSbank 12-01-2016 Payment 5,00,000-00 Hld. By labour charges. 31-03-2016 48,55,140.00 TDS payable Journal 48,551.00 15,48,551.00 48,55,140-00 33,06,589.00 To closing balance. 6. The ld. AO observed that there was a payment