BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “TDS”+ Cash Depositclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,113Delhi1,030Kolkata350Chennai316Bangalore313Hyderabad193Ahmedabad174Jaipur167Chandigarh128Pune89Raipur84Cochin80Indore79Surat59Visakhapatnam47Lucknow47Rajkot46Karnataka34Nagpur30Amritsar28Jodhpur24Cuttack23Guwahati17Patna14Allahabad11Agra7Jabalpur7Dehradun7Ranchi7SC6Telangana6Panaji5Kerala4Varanasi3Calcutta2J&K2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 44B23Section 143(3)7Addition to Income5Section 684Section 134Section 40A(2)4Disallowance4Exemption4Section 403Section 69A

JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SUBHASH ROAD DEHADUN vs. M/S TIMES SQUARE, SAHASTRADHARA ROAD

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 42/DDN/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun26 Sept 2025AY 2017-18
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 43CSection 69A

deposit in bank account. Therefore, the AO has made addition towards\nUnexplained money u/s 69A of the IT act amounting to Rs.2,24,34,000/-\n\n5.1.2 During the appeal proceedings, the appellant has submitted that thecash\ndeposited was sourced from opening cash in hand and cash withdrawals\nmade during the year. As per audited balance sheet

SUNIL SRIVASTAVA,HALDWANI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1)(3), HALDWANI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 10/DDN/2021[2016-17]Status: Disposed
3
Section 2502
Unexplained Money2
ITAT Dehradun
15 Sept 2023
AY 2016-17

Bench: Him From Time To Time

Section 10(38)Section 143(3)Section 206CSection 44A

TDS was deposited by them as late as 13.12.2016 is absolutely an irrelevant consideration as far as the assessee is concerned. If the revenue has any grievance over this, then suitable action should have been taken on M/s Parvatiya Mines instead of disbelieving the transactions of the assessee. 12. In view of the aforesaid observations, we hold that the income

INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL RESEARCH (INDIA) SOCIETY,DEHRADUN vs. ACIT, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 4207/DEL/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun15 Jan 2025AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Dr. Rakesh Gupta, AdvFor Respondent: Shri A.S. Rana, Sr. DR
Section 11Section 13Section 36(1)(iii)Section 40A(2)Section 40A(2)(b)Section 68

deposit made with ICRI Research [P] Ltd is for non-business purpose. We are therefore of the considered view that the ld. CIT(A), relying upon similar disallowance cancelled in A.Y 2006-07, correctly came to the conclusion that the transaction did not amount to diversion of borrowed funds for non-business purposes. Accordingly, we dismiss the Ground

DCIT, DEHRADUN vs. M/S INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL RESEARCH (INDIA) SOCIETY,, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 3927/DEL/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun15 Jan 2025AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Dr. Rakesh Gupta, AdvFor Respondent: Shri A.S. Rana, Sr. DR
Section 11Section 13Section 36(1)(iii)Section 40A(2)Section 40A(2)(b)Section 68

deposit made with ICRI Research [P] Ltd is for non-business purpose. We are therefore of the considered view that the ld. CIT(A), relying upon similar disallowance cancelled in A.Y 2006-07, correctly came to the conclusion that the transaction did not amount to diversion of borrowed funds for non-business purposes. Accordingly, we dismiss the Ground

SHERWATER GEOSERVICES LTD. INDIA PROJECT OFFICE,DEHRADUN vs. AICT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE-2, DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 6/DDN/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun27 Oct 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Sanjay Aggarwal, CAFor Respondent: Sh. A. S. Rana, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 44B

deposited with the treasury, would form part of the Assessee’s trading receipt.’ 13. The decision in George Oakes (P) Ltd. (supra) was concerned with the constitutional validity of the Madras General Sales (Definition of Turnover and Validation of Assessments) Act, 1954 on the ground that the word turnover was defined to include sales tax collected by the dealer

SAEXPLORATION INC INDIA PROJECTS OFFICE,DEHRADUN vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE-2, DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 5/DDN/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun27 Oct 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Taran Preet Singh, CAFor Respondent: Sh. A. S. Rana, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 44B

deposited with the treasury, would form part of the Assessee’s trading receipt.’ 13. The decision in George Oakes (P) Ltd. (supra) was concerned with the constitutional validity of the Madras General Sales (Definition of Turnover and Validation of Assessments) Act, 1954 on the ground that the word turnover was defined to include sales tax collected by the dealer

PRADEEP SHARDA,DEHRADUN vs. ACIT, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 223/DDN/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun25 Mar 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwal[Assessment Year : 2017-18] Pradeep Sharda Vs Acit 7, Inder Road, Dehradun Circle-1(2)(1) Uttarakhand -248001 Dehradun Pan-Adwps5692K Uttarakhand Appellant Respondent Appellant By Shri Anil Jain, Adv. Respondent By Shri Amar Pal Singh, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 12.03.2026 Date Of Pronouncement 25.03.2026 Order Per Bench: The Present Appeal Is Filed By Assessee Against The Order Dated 24.09.2025 Passed By Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (A)/Addl/Jcit(A)-1, Nashik [“Ld. Cit(A)”] In Appeal No. Cit(A), Dehradun/10344/2019-20 U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“The Act”] Arising Out Of Assessment Order Dated 01.11.2019 Passed U/S 143(3) Of The Act Pertaining To Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That Assessee Is A Practicing Doctor & E-Filed His Return Of Income, Declaring Total Income Of Inr 2,16,70,906/- On 30.10.2017. The Assessment Was Completed U/S 143(3) Of The Act By Making Additions Of Inr 15,84,870/- Comprising Of The Disallowance U/S 40(A)(Ia) Of The Act Of Inr 5,05,195/- & Treating The Agricultural Income Of Inr 6,25,000/- As Unexplained Money U/S 69A Of The Act & Of Inr 4,54,675/- As The Addition U/S 68 Of The Act On Account Of Cash Credit.

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 40Section 68Section 69A

cash credit. 3. In first appeal, Ld. CIT(A) has deleted the addition of INR 4,54,675/- made u/s 68 of the Act and confirmed the addition of INR 6,25,000/- made on account of agricultural income treated as undisclosed income and disallowance made u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act of INR 5,05,195/-. 4. Before