BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 53Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi66Bangalore64Mumbai55Hyderabad32Chandigarh20Chennai17Indore13Kolkata11Ahmedabad10Surat10Karnataka6Agra5Pune5Telangana5Jaipur4Cochin4Cuttack3Visakhapatnam2Nagpur2Ranchi1SC1Jabalpur1Calcutta1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 54F13Section 53A4Section 1483Section 543Capital Gains3Exemption3Deduction3Section 1472Section 2(47)2Natural Justice

ABHAYA PRASAD PANDA,BHUBANESWAR vs. ITO, BHUBANESWAR

ITA 250/CTK/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack04 May 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year : 2007-2008

For Appellant: Shri Dillip Kumar Mohanty, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Pradhan, DR
Section 147Section 148Section 2(47)Section 53ASection 54F

53A for transfer of Property Act. The possession of land was taken by the builder in part performance of the contract for transfer of the property. The Assessing Officer relied upon the decisions in the cases of Rubab M. S. Kazerani v. JCIT (ITAT, Mum-TM), 91 ITD 429, and Lalitha Ramaswamy v. ITO(ITAT

ITO, BHUBANESWAR vs. ABHAYA PRASAD PANDA, BHUBANESWAR

2
ITA 214/CTK/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack04 May 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year : 2007-2008

For Appellant: Shri Dillip Kumar Mohanty, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Pradhan, DR
Section 147Section 148Section 2(47)Section 53ASection 54F

53A for transfer of Property Act. The possession of land was taken by the builder in part performance of the contract for transfer of the property. The Assessing Officer relied upon the decisions in the cases of Rubab M. S. Kazerani v. JCIT (ITAT, Mum-TM), 91 ITD 429, and Lalitha Ramaswamy v. ITO(ITAT

ITO, WARD-3(2), BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR vs. GAYA SANTARA, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and the appeal

ITA 468/CTK/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack28 Jul 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year :2008-09

For Appellant: Shri S.K.Agarwalla, ARFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR
Section 148Section 54Section 54F

53A of the Transfer of Property Act during the financial year 2007-08 relevant to assessment year 2008-09. The assessee declared full value of consideration of capital asset ITA No. 483/CT K/ 2014 Asse ssment Year :20 08- 09 of Rs.70,89,600/- and deducted therefrom indexed cost of acquisition of capital asset of Rs.2,73,003/-, Rs.6