BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “section 68”+ Section 271Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur39Delhi26Mumbai26Karnataka21Chennai21Hyderabad16Ahmedabad16Indore12Pune11Visakhapatnam10Kolkata9Agra8Surat7Bangalore6Rajkot4Ranchi3Jabalpur2Cuttack2Nagpur2SC1Amritsar1Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 269S8Section 271D4Section 1322Penalty2Addition to Income2Search & Seizure2

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. HOTEL SUKHAMAYA PVT. LTD, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the three appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 205/CTK/2022[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Sept 2024AY 2009-10
Section 132Section 269SSection 271D

271E could be imposed and the penalty was cancelled. In the case of OMEC Engineers Vs. CIT (294 ITR 599), the assessee was a firm carrying on contract business. The assessee received Rs.20,000/- or more in cash from 11 persons between. February 14, 1993, and November 10, 1993, amounting to Rs.5 lakhs. The return filed by the assessee

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. HOTEL SUKHAMAYA PVT. LTD, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the three appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 206/CTK/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack
18 Sept 2024
AY 2012-13
Section 132Section 269SSection 271D

271E could be imposed and the penalty was cancelled. In the case of OMEC Engineers Vs. CIT (294 ITR 599), the assessee was a firm carrying on contract business. The assessee received Rs.20,000/- or more in cash from 11 persons between. February 14, 1993, and November 10, 1993, amounting to Rs.5 lakhs. The return filed by the assessee