Search: section 68

6 results for “section 68”+ Section 144C(13)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 142(1)21 Section 143(3)20 Addition to Income6 Section 1475 Section 1445 Section 92C5 Transfer Pricing5

ACIT,CIRCLE-1(1), SAMBALPUR vs. M/S. TRL KROSAKI REFRACTORIES LIMITED, JHARASUGUDHA

In the result, appeals of the revenue for the assessment years 2010-

ITA 262/CTK/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack23 Aug 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpiaita No.260 260/Ctk/2020: Assessment Year Assessment Year :2010-2011

For Appellant: S/Shri Ajit Korde/Bunty SharmaFor Respondent: Shri M.K.Gautam, CIT DR

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 92C

13, wherein, the Assessing Officer had categorically asked the assessee to show cause why the additions as proposed by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) was not to be made in the assessment. Other issues were also raised in the notice u/s.142(1) of the Act. It was the submission that the P a g e 3 | 17 M/s. TRL Krosaki

ACIT,CIRCLE-1(1), SAMBALPUR vs. M/S. TRL KROSAKI REFRACTORIES LIMITED, JHARASUGUDHA

ACIT,CIRCLE-1(1), SAMBALPUR vs. M/S. TRL KROSAKI REFRACTORIES LIMITED, JHARASUGUDHA

ACIT(CIRCLE-1(1),, SAMBALPUR vs. M/S. TRL KROSAKI REFRACTORIES LIMITED, JHARSUGUDHA

ACIT,CIRCLE-1(1), SAMBALPUR, SAMBALPUR vs. M/S. TRL KROSAKI REFRACTORIES LIMITED, JHARSUGUDHA

ACIT,CIRCLE-1(1),, SAMBALPUR vs. M/S. TRL KROSAKI REFRACTORIES LIMITED, JHARSUGUDHA

ACIT,CIRCLE-1(!), SAMBALPUR vs. M/S. TRL KROSAKI REFRACTORIES LIMITED, JHARSUGUDHA

DHANALAXMI JEWELLERS,ANGUL vs. ITO, ANGUL WARD, ANGUL