BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 254clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai529Delhi430Chennai108Jaipur98Bangalore92Ahmedabad79Chandigarh70Raipur66Surat60Kolkata51Pune43Cochin35Hyderabad25Lucknow22Indore17Guwahati11Dehradun7Rajkot7Visakhapatnam6Jodhpur6Amritsar6Nagpur6Agra4Patna3Karnataka3Cuttack2Panaji2Telangana2Varanasi2Uttarakhand1Jabalpur1Kerala1

Key Topics

Section 1488Section 2634Section 69A4Section 1472Section 143(3)2Section 142(1)2Reopening of Assessment2Addition to Income2

OMM DHANA LAXMI JEWELLERS,ANGUL vs. PCIT, INCOME TAX

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 249/CTK/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack23 Sept 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Manish Agarwalassessment Year : 2013-14 M/S. Omm Dhanalaxmi Vs. Pr. Cit, Bhubaneswar-1. Jewellers, Bazar Chowk, Main Road, Angul-759122 Pan/Gir No.Aagfd 8791 D (Appellant) .. ( Respondent) Assessee By : Shri P.K.Mishra, Adv Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Kumar, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 23/9/2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 23/9/2024 O R D E R Per Bench This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Passed By The Ld Pr.Cit, Bhubaneswar-1 U/S.263 Of The Act Dated 30.3.2024 For The Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds: “1) That The Ld. Pr Cit Bhubaneswar Has Erred In Law By Utilizing Section 263 For Directing The Assessing Officer To Do Necessary Verification As Per The Order Of Hon'Ble Itat Cuttack Bench Vide Order Dated 01-10-2019 Which Was Already Barred By Limitation. Provisions Of 263 Does Not Allow To Proceed For A Matter Which Was Already Barred By Limitation. Hence, The Order Passed Us 263 Needs To Be Quashed In To.

For Appellant: Shri P.K.Mishra, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 254Section 263

254 of the Act dated 22.6.2021 wherein the income was computed at Rs. 34,710/-, which is placed on record. 11. In the meantime, the Assessing Officer, based on information received from Investigation Wing, Kolkata that M/s Goodshine Vyapaar Pvt. Ltd from whom loan of Rs. 20 lakhs was received is a shell company, has initiated reassessment proceedings u/s 147

ANALA RAM RAO,KORAPUT vs. ITO, JEYPORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 413/CTK/2010[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack15 Oct 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Laxmi Prasad Sahuassessment Year : 2005-2006

For Appellant: Shri P.C.Sethi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR
Section 139Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 69A

u/s 69A of the Act to the extent of Rs. 7,08,158/- which is contrary to the provisions of section 69A of the Act and for that matter the addition is liable to be deleted. “ 4. We find that the above additional grounds raised by the assessee against (i) issue of notice u/s.148 of the Act (ii) absence