Search: reassessment u/s 147

1 result for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 10Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai81 Delhi52 Hyderabad41 Bangalore35 Chennai26 Jaipur25 Kolkata22 Cochin13 Ahmedabad12 Pune12 Lucknow11 Indore7 Calcutta2 Chandigarh2 Varanasi2 Cuttack1 Jodhpur1 Raipur1 Surat1 Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 2557 Section 255(8)3 Section 2632 Section 255(7)2

M/S. L.A.DEVELOPERS,BHUBANESWAR vs. CIT, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 273/CTK/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack09 May 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpiaassessment Year : 2008-2009 2009 M/S. M/S. L.A.Developers, L.A.Developers, Hig Hig-47, Vs. Cit, 2Nd Floor, Floor, Jayadev Jayadev Bhubaneswar. Bhubaneswar. Vihar, Bhubaneswar. Vihar, Bhubaneswar. Pan/Gir No. No.Aacfl 6157 D (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By : Shri P.C.Sethi, Ar , Ar Revenue By : Shri M.K.Gautam, Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 02 /6/ 20 / 2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 02 / /6/2022 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri P.C.Sethi, ARFor Respondent: Shri M.k.Gautam

Section 255Section 255(7)Section 255(8)Section 263

u/s 255(8) of the Act. Ld counsel for the assessee submitted that the appeal should not be adjourned to such a long date but the application could be disposed off in respect of whether the Tribunal has the jurisdiction to hear the appeal in view of the insertion of section 255(7,8 & 9). Consequently, the appeal was posted