BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 245clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi425Mumbai287Chennai106Bangalore83Kolkata55Jaipur48Ahmedabad38Chandigarh36Hyderabad35Indore35Surat24Lucknow20Raipur20Pune19Guwahati18Allahabad17Rajkot16SC11Jodhpur10Nagpur10Amritsar9Cochin8Patna7Dehradun5Karnataka3Cuttack3Panaji2Visakhapatnam2K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Jabalpur1Agra1Rajasthan1Ranchi1Telangana1Uttarakhand1

Key Topics

Section 142(1)4Section 1474Addition to Income3Section 2632Depreciation2Disallowance2Revision u/s 2632Set Off of Losses2

MAA PAHADWALI RICE MILL,BOUDH, ODISHA vs. ITO, WARD, PHULBANI, PHULBANI

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 354/CTK/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack23 Sept 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Before Shri George Mathanmember & Manish Agarwal Manish Agarwalassessment Year : 2017-18 Maa Pahadwali Rice Mill, Maa Pahadwali Rice Mill, Vs. Ito, Ward, Phulbani Ito, Ward, Phulbani Kamalpur, Po: Telibandha, Kamalpur, Po: Telibandha, Dist: Boudh. Pan/Gir No. No.Aaufm 3720 D (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By Assessee By : Shri J.M.Pattnaik & Subit Sahu, Advs J.M.Pattnaik & Subit Sahu, Advs Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Kumar, Cit Sanjay Kumar, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 23/9/202 24 Date Of Pronouncement : 23/9/20 024 O R D E R Per Bench

For Appellant: Shri J.M.Pattnaik & Subit Sahu, AdvsFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, CIT
Section 142(1)Section 147Section 282(1)Section 68

245/- was made which is in clear violation of principles of natural justice. It was the submission that the Assessing Officer has passed assessment order u/s.147/144 r.w.s 144B of the Act making addition u/s.68 of the Act of the cash deposits made in the cash credit account standing in State of Bank of India without considering the facts

THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF ORISSA LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed and appeal of

ITA 392/CTK/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack17 Feb 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.379/Ctk/2017 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009 - 2010) Dcit, Corporate Circle-1(1), Vs. M/S Industrial Development Bhubaneswar Corporation Of Orissa Ltd., Idcol House, Ashok Nagar, Bhubaneswar स्थायी ऱेखा सं./Pan No. : Aaaci 4821 L & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.392/Ctk/2017 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009 - 2010) M/S Industrial Development Vs. Dcit, Corporate Circle-1(1), Corporation Of Orissa Ltd., Bhubaneswar Idcol House, Ashok Nagar, Bhubaneswar स्थायी ऱेखा सं./Pan No. : Aaaci 4821 L (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. यनधागररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri S.C.Bhadra,Ca राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri M.K.Gautam, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 29/01/2020 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 17/02/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per L.P.Sahu, Am : These Are The Cross Appeals Filed By The Revenue & Assessee, Arising Out Of The Order Dated 15.06.2017 Passed By The Cit(A)-3, Bhubaneswar, For The Assessment Year 2009-2010. 2. First We Shall Take Up The Appeal Of The Revenue In Ita

For Appellant: Shri S.C.Bhadra,CAFor Respondent: Shri M.K.Gautam, CIT-DR
Section 147Section 263

245 ITR 428( Delhi), it is held that the provision towards pay revision debited to the P&L Account is an ascertained liability crystallized in the year under appeal and hence it is an admissible deduction. This ground of appeal of the appellant is allowed.” From the above observations of the CIT(A), we find that the CIT(A) while

DCIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1(1), BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF ORISSA LTD., BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed and appeal of

ITA 379/CTK/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack17 Feb 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.379/Ctk/2017 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009 - 2010) Dcit, Corporate Circle-1(1), Vs. M/S Industrial Development Bhubaneswar Corporation Of Orissa Ltd., Idcol House, Ashok Nagar, Bhubaneswar स्थायी ऱेखा सं./Pan No. : Aaaci 4821 L & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.392/Ctk/2017 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009 - 2010) M/S Industrial Development Vs. Dcit, Corporate Circle-1(1), Corporation Of Orissa Ltd., Bhubaneswar Idcol House, Ashok Nagar, Bhubaneswar स्थायी ऱेखा सं./Pan No. : Aaaci 4821 L (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. यनधागररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri S.C.Bhadra,Ca राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri M.K.Gautam, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 29/01/2020 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 17/02/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per L.P.Sahu, Am : These Are The Cross Appeals Filed By The Revenue & Assessee, Arising Out Of The Order Dated 15.06.2017 Passed By The Cit(A)-3, Bhubaneswar, For The Assessment Year 2009-2010. 2. First We Shall Take Up The Appeal Of The Revenue In Ita

For Appellant: Shri S.C.Bhadra,CAFor Respondent: Shri M.K.Gautam, CIT-DR
Section 147Section 263

245 ITR 428( Delhi), it is held that the provision towards pay revision debited to the P&L Account is an ascertained liability crystallized in the year under appeal and hence it is an admissible deduction. This ground of appeal of the appellant is allowed.” From the above observations of the CIT(A), we find that the CIT(A) while