NEELACHAL GRAMYA BANK,BHUBANESWAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3), BHUBANESWAR
In the result, all the appeal of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 372/CTK/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack30 Sept 2024AY 2013-14
Bench: Before Shri George Mathanmember & Manish Agarwal Manish Agarwalita Nos.369 To 372 /Ctk/2024 Assessment Years : 2012-13 & 2013-14 Assessment Year 14 Neelachal Neelachal Gramya Gramya Vs. Dcit, Circle-2(1), 2(1), Bank,190/702, /702, Kokila Kokila Bhubaneswar Residency, Residency, Ananta Ananta Bihar, Bihar, Airport Area Post Area Post Office, Office, Pokhariput, Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan/Gir No. No.Aaaln 0450 F (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By Assessee By : S/Shri B.K.Mahapatra & A.K.Sabat, Cas B.K.Mahapatra & A.K.Sabat, Cas Revenue By : Shri Saroj Kumar Dubey, Cit Aroj Kumar Dubey, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 30/9/202 24 Date Of Pronouncement : 30/9/20 024
For Appellant: S/Shri B.K.Mahapatra and A.K.Sabat, CAsFor Respondent: Shri Saroj Kumar Dubey, CIT aroj Kumar Dubey, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 221(1)
section 221(1) of the Act.
3. Shri B.K.Mahapatra and A.K.Sabat, CAs appeared for the assessee and Shri Saroj Kumar Dubey, ld CIT DR appeared for the revenue.
4. It was submitted by ld AR that the ld CIT(A) has not given due opportunity of hearing to the assessee and passed the impugned orders exparte. It was the submission