BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “reassessment”+ Section 173(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi494Mumbai239Chennai130Bangalore73Jaipur55Amritsar49Raipur46Patna32Kolkata30Chandigarh28Indore25Surat22Allahabad20Lucknow20Ahmedabad17Pune16Agra9Hyderabad9Karnataka8Visakhapatnam7Cochin7Cuttack6Nagpur4Telangana3Jodhpur3Rajasthan2Guwahati2Rajkot1SC1

Key Topics

Section 14816Section 1478Addition to Income5Section 271(1)(c)4Section 143(2)4Section 374Reopening of Assessment4Condonation of Delay4

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR vs. SMT. INDRANI PATNAIK, ROURKELA

In the result, all the four appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 182/CTK/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack11 Dec 2025AY 2010-11
Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 37

1) of the Act refers to expenditure incurred\nby an Assessee \"for any purpose which is an offence\" or \"which is\nprohibited by law\". Such expenditure is not deemed to be incurred for\nthe purpose of business and no deduction or allowance can be made\nin respect of such expenditure. This does not imply that the character\nof the very

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR vs. SMT. INDRANI PATNAIK, ROURKELA

In the result, all the four appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 179/CTK/2020[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack11 Dec 2025AY 2009-10
Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 37

1) of the Act refers to expenditure incurred\nby an Assessee \"for any purpose which is an offence\" or \"which is\nprohibited by law\". Such expenditure is not deemed to be incurred for\nthe purpose of business and no deduction or allowance can be made\nin respect of such expenditure. This does not imply that the character\nof the very

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR vs. SMT. INDRANI PATNAIK, ROURKELA

In the result, all the four appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 180/CTK/2020[209-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack11 Dec 2025
Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 37

1) of the Act refers to expenditure incurred\nby an Assessee \"for any purpose which is an offence\" or \"which is\nprohibited by law\". Such expenditure is not deemed to be incurred for\nthe purpose of business and no deduction or allowance can be made\nin respect of such expenditure. This does not imply that the character\nof the very

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR vs. SMT. INDRANI PATNAIK, ROURKELA

In the result, all the four appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 181/CTK/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack11 Dec 2025AY 2010-11
Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 37

1) of the Act refers to expenditure incurred\nby an Assessee \"for any purpose which is an offence\" or \"which is\nprohibited by law\". Such expenditure is not deemed to be incurred for\nthe purpose of business and no deduction or allowance can be made\nin respect of such expenditure. This does not imply that the character\nof the very

SANKAR PATRO,GANJAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, BERHAMPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 417/CTK/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack01 Dec 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN (Judicial Member), SHRI RAJESH KUMAR (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri S.K.Sarangi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Vijay Singh, Sr. DR
Section 148Section 148A

173 taxmann.com 582 (para 10 to 10.2). 3 iii) Order of ITAT Pune, in DCIT Vs. Kolte Patil Integrated Townships Ltd. ITA Nos. 2023 and 2011/PUN/2024 Dt.10.03.2025 (para 44 and 45). Copy of the above case laws are enclosed. PRAYER The assessee humbly pray that the reassessment notice u/s.148 of the IT Act dated 23.08.2022 is barred by limitation, illegal

BAJRANG ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED,ROURKELA vs. ACIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 4/CTK/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack07 Jun 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Arun Khodpiabajrang Engineers Pvt. Ltd. J-3/4, Civil Township, Rourkela-769004 Pan No.Aacca 6655 L …………….. Assessee Versus The Acit, Central Circle, Sambalpur ………………Revenue

Section 153Section 153C

reassessed, whereas section 153C comes into play only upon proving that during course of search some incriminating material pertaining to a third party is found. In other words section 153A provides for making an assessment in respect of each assessment year falling within six assessment years, upto the date of search, whereas section 153C refers to issuance of notice