Search: penalty u/s 271

3 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 32(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 270A13 Section 14A8 Section 143(3)2 Section 120(4)(b)2

SANTOSH KUMAR KHANDELWAL,BARIPADA vs. ACIT, BALASORE, BALASORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 449/CTK/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack25 Nov 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Manish Agarwalआयकर अपील संसंसंसं/Ita No.449/Ctk/2024 (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-2018) वष"

Section 144Section 270(9)(c)Section 270ASection 274Section 9

32,140/-. As the assessee has not filed the relevant details, the Assessing Officer has estimated the income of the assessee from contract activity by applying the net profit rate at 6% before interest and remuneration of the partners. 3 The Assessing Officer initiated the penalty proceedings u/s. 270A of the Act and thereafter had levied the penalty u/s. 270A

SANTOSH KUMAR KHANDELWAL,BARIPADA vs. ACIT, BALASORE, BALASORE

M/S. ALTRADE MINERALS PVT. LIMITED,ROURKELA vs. ACIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR, SAMBALPUR

SANTOSH KUMAR KHANDELWAL,BARIPADA vs. ACIT, BALASORE, BALASORE

M/S. ALTRADE MINERALS PVT. LIMITED,ROURKELA vs. ACIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR, SAMBALPUR

SYLVESA INFOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. ITO WARD -1(1), BHUBANESWAR