BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

16 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 272A(2)(e)clear

Sorted by relevance

Indore47Chennai44Mumbai32Surat28Cuttack16Bangalore14Jaipur10Kolkata6Visakhapatnam6Rajkot6Delhi4Jabalpur3Chandigarh3Pune3Ahmedabad2Nagpur2Allahabad2Raipur2Guwahati1Cochin1Lucknow1

Key Topics

Section 14416Section 272A(1)(d)16Section 14716Penalty16Section 271(1)(c)8Section 143(3)8Section 270A8Section 271D8Section 148

SAHOO DISTRIBUTERS PRIVATE LIMITED,JAJPUR vs. ASSTT. CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, CUTTACK

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2/CTK/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack22 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Before Shri George Mathanmember & Manish Agarwal

For Appellant: S/Shri P.K.Mishra/Himansu Jena/Narahari SwainFor Respondent: Shri Saroj Kumar Dubey, CIT DR and Saroj Kumar Dubey, CIT DR and Shri S.C.Mohant
Section 147Section 148Section 270ASection 271DSection 272A(1)(d)

2. For that, the learned CIT(A) has committed gross error of law as well as of fact, in dismissing the appeal of the Appellant Company and in confirming the penalty order passed by the learned A.O., for non- compliance to the statutory notice issued u/s. 142(1) of the Act, dated 09.08.2021, particularly when, the said notice was issued

8
Limitation/Time-bar8
Condonation of Delay8
Reassessment8

SAHOO DIOSTRIBUTERS PRIVATE LIMITED,JAJPUR vs. ASSTT.CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, CUTTACK

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 6/CTK/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack22 Jan 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Before Shri George Mathanmember & Manish Agarwal

For Appellant: S/Shri P.K.Mishra/Himansu Jena/Narahari SwainFor Respondent: Shri Saroj Kumar Dubey, CIT DR and Saroj Kumar Dubey, CIT DR and Shri S.C.Mohant
Section 147Section 148Section 270ASection 271DSection 272A(1)(d)

2. For that, the learned CIT(A) has committed gross error of law as well as of fact, in dismissing the appeal of the Appellant Company and in confirming the penalty order passed by the learned A.O., for non- compliance to the statutory notice issued u/s. 142(1) of the Act, dated 09.08.2021, particularly when, the said notice was issued

SAHOO DISTRIBNUTORS (P) LIMITED,JAJPUR vs. ASSTT. CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, CUTTACK

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1/CTK/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack22 Jan 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Before Shri George Mathanmember & Manish Agarwal

For Appellant: S/Shri P.K.Mishra/Himansu Jena/Narahari SwainFor Respondent: Shri Saroj Kumar Dubey, CIT DR and Saroj Kumar Dubey, CIT DR and Shri S.C.Mohant
Section 147Section 148Section 270ASection 271DSection 272A(1)(d)

2. For that, the learned CIT(A) has committed gross error of law as well as of fact, in dismissing the appeal of the Appellant Company and in confirming the penalty order passed by the learned A.O., for non- compliance to the statutory notice issued u/s. 142(1) of the Act, dated 09.08.2021, particularly when, the said notice was issued

SAHOO DISTRIBUTERS PRIVATE LIMITED,JAJPUR vs. ASSTT. CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, CUTTACK

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3/CTK/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack22 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Before Shri George Mathanmember & Manish Agarwal

For Appellant: S/Shri P.K.Mishra/Himansu Jena/Narahari SwainFor Respondent: Shri Saroj Kumar Dubey, CIT DR and Saroj Kumar Dubey, CIT DR and Shri S.C.Mohant
Section 147Section 148Section 270ASection 271DSection 272A(1)(d)

2. For that, the learned CIT(A) has committed gross error of law as well as of fact, in dismissing the appeal of the Appellant Company and in confirming the penalty order passed by the learned A.O., for non- compliance to the statutory notice issued u/s. 142(1) of the Act, dated 09.08.2021, particularly when, the said notice was issued

SAHOO DISTRIBUTERS PRIVATE LIMITED,JAJPUR vs. ASSTT. CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, CUTTACK

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 4/CTK/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack22 Jan 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Before Shri George Mathanmember & Manish Agarwal

For Appellant: S/Shri P.K.Mishra/Himansu Jena/Narahari SwainFor Respondent: Shri Saroj Kumar Dubey, CIT DR and Saroj Kumar Dubey, CIT DR and Shri S.C.Mohant
Section 147Section 148Section 270ASection 271DSection 272A(1)(d)

2. For that, the learned CIT(A) has committed gross error of law as well as of fact, in dismissing the appeal of the Appellant Company and in confirming the penalty order passed by the learned A.O., for non- compliance to the statutory notice issued u/s. 142(1) of the Act, dated 09.08.2021, particularly when, the said notice was issued

SAHOO DISTRIBUTERS PRIVATE LIMITED,JAJPUR vs. ASSTT.CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, CUTTACK

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 5/CTK/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack22 Jan 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Before Shri George Mathanmember & Manish Agarwal

For Appellant: S/Shri P.K.Mishra/Himansu Jena/Narahari SwainFor Respondent: Shri Saroj Kumar Dubey, CIT DR and Saroj Kumar Dubey, CIT DR and Shri S.C.Mohant
Section 147Section 148Section 270ASection 271DSection 272A(1)(d)

2. For that, the learned CIT(A) has committed gross error of law as well as of fact, in dismissing the appeal of the Appellant Company and in confirming the penalty order passed by the learned A.O., for non- compliance to the statutory notice issued u/s. 142(1) of the Act, dated 09.08.2021, particularly when, the said notice was issued

SAHOO DISTRIBUTERS PRIVATE LIMITED,JAJPUR vs. ASST.CIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE, AAYAKAR BHAWAN,SHELTER SQUARE,

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 7/CTK/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack22 Jan 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Before Shri George Mathanmember & Manish Agarwal

For Appellant: S/Shri P.K.Mishra/Himansu Jena/Narahari SwainFor Respondent: Shri Saroj Kumar Dubey, CIT DR and Saroj Kumar Dubey, CIT DR and Shri S.C.Mohant
Section 147Section 148Section 270ASection 271DSection 272A(1)(d)

2. For that, the learned CIT(A) has committed gross error of law as well as of fact, in dismissing the appeal of the Appellant Company and in confirming the penalty order passed by the learned A.O., for non- compliance to the statutory notice issued u/s. 142(1) of the Act, dated 09.08.2021, particularly when, the said notice was issued

SAHOO DISTRIBUTERS PRIVATE LIMITED,JAJPUR vs. ASST,CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE , AAYAKAR BHAWAN

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 8/CTK/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack22 Jan 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Before Shri George Mathanmember & Manish Agarwal

For Appellant: S/Shri P.K.Mishra/Himansu Jena/Narahari SwainFor Respondent: Shri Saroj Kumar Dubey, CIT DR and Saroj Kumar Dubey, CIT DR and Shri S.C.Mohant
Section 147Section 148Section 270ASection 271DSection 272A(1)(d)

2. For that, the learned CIT(A) has committed gross error of law as well as of fact, in dismissing the appeal of the Appellant Company and in confirming the penalty order passed by the learned A.O., for non- compliance to the statutory notice issued u/s. 142(1) of the Act, dated 09.08.2021, particularly when, the said notice was issued

ORISSA STATE CO-OPERATIVE HANDICRAFTS CORPORATION LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-1(1), , BHUBANEWSWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 497/CTK/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack01 Dec 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumar

For Respondent: Shri Asim Chakraborty, ld CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 271(1)(c)Section 272A(1)(d)

E R Per Bench : ITA No.496/CTK/2025 and ITA No.498/CTK/2025 are the appeals filed by the assessee against the separate orders dated 5.8.2025 passed by the ld CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi in Appeal No.NFAC/2013-14/10315114 and Appeal No.NFAC/2014-15/10314179 for the assessment years 2014-15 and 2015-16, in the matter of assessment year 143(3) of the Act. 2 आयकर

ORISSA STATE CO-OPERATIVE HANDICRAFTS CORPORATION LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-1(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 498/CTK/2025[2015016]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack01 Dec 2025

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumar

For Respondent: Shri Asim Chakraborty, ld CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 271(1)(c)Section 272A(1)(d)

E R Per Bench : ITA No.496/CTK/2025 and ITA No.498/CTK/2025 are the appeals filed by the assessee against the separate orders dated 5.8.2025 passed by the ld CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi in Appeal No.NFAC/2013-14/10315114 and Appeal No.NFAC/2014-15/10314179 for the assessment years 2014-15 and 2015-16, in the matter of assessment year 143(3) of the Act. 2 आयकर

ORISSA STATE CO-OPERATIVE HANDICRAFTS CORPORATION LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-1(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 496/CTK/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack01 Dec 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumar

For Respondent: Shri Asim Chakraborty, ld CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 271(1)(c)Section 272A(1)(d)

E R Per Bench : ITA No.496/CTK/2025 and ITA No.498/CTK/2025 are the appeals filed by the assessee against the separate orders dated 5.8.2025 passed by the ld CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi in Appeal No.NFAC/2013-14/10315114 and Appeal No.NFAC/2014-15/10314179 for the assessment years 2014-15 and 2015-16, in the matter of assessment year 143(3) of the Act. 2 आयकर

ORISSA STATE CO-OPERATIVE HANDICRAFTS CORPORATION LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-1(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 500/CTK/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack01 Dec 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumar

For Respondent: Shri Asim Chakraborty, ld CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 271(1)(c)Section 272A(1)(d)

E R Per Bench : ITA No.496/CTK/2025 and ITA No.498/CTK/2025 are the appeals filed by the assessee against the separate orders dated 5.8.2025 passed by the ld CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi in Appeal No.NFAC/2013-14/10315114 and Appeal No.NFAC/2014-15/10314179 for the assessment years 2014-15 and 2015-16, in the matter of assessment year 143(3) of the Act. 2 आयकर

ORISSA STATE CO-OPERATIVE HANDICRAFTS CORPORATION LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-1(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 503/CTK/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack01 Dec 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumar

For Respondent: Shri Asim Chakraborty, ld CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 271(1)(c)Section 272A(1)(d)

E R Per Bench : ITA No.496/CTK/2025 and ITA No.498/CTK/2025 are the appeals filed by the assessee against the separate orders dated 5.8.2025 passed by the ld CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi in Appeal No.NFAC/2013-14/10315114 and Appeal No.NFAC/2014-15/10314179 for the assessment years 2014-15 and 2015-16, in the matter of assessment year 143(3) of the Act. 2 आयकर

ORISSA STATE CO-OPERATIVE HANDICRAFTS CORPORATION LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-1(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 504/CTK/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack01 Dec 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumar

For Respondent: Shri Asim Chakraborty, ld CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 271(1)(c)Section 272A(1)(d)

E R Per Bench : ITA No.496/CTK/2025 and ITA No.498/CTK/2025 are the appeals filed by the assessee against the separate orders dated 5.8.2025 passed by the ld CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi in Appeal No.NFAC/2013-14/10315114 and Appeal No.NFAC/2014-15/10314179 for the assessment years 2014-15 and 2015-16, in the matter of assessment year 143(3) of the Act. 2 आयकर

ORISSA STATE CO-OPERATIVE HANDICRAFTS CORPORATION LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-1(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 499/CTK/2025[2015016]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack01 Dec 2025

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumar

For Respondent: Shri Asim Chakraborty, ld CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 271(1)(c)Section 272A(1)(d)

E R Per Bench : ITA No.496/CTK/2025 and ITA No.498/CTK/2025 are the appeals filed by the assessee against the separate orders dated 5.8.2025 passed by the ld CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi in Appeal No.NFAC/2013-14/10315114 and Appeal No.NFAC/2014-15/10314179 for the assessment years 2014-15 and 2015-16, in the matter of assessment year 143(3) of the Act. 2 आयकर

ORISSA STATE CO-OPERATIVE HANDICRAFTS CORPORATION LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-1(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 502/CTK/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack01 Dec 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumar

For Respondent: Shri Asim Chakraborty, ld CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 271(1)(c)Section 272A(1)(d)

E R Per Bench : ITA No.496/CTK/2025 and ITA No.498/CTK/2025 are the appeals filed by the assessee against the separate orders dated 5.8.2025 passed by the ld CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi in Appeal No.NFAC/2013-14/10315114 and Appeal No.NFAC/2014-15/10314179 for the assessment years 2014-15 and 2015-16, in the matter of assessment year 143(3) of the Act. 2 आयकर