MD. MOFAZZALUR RAHAMAN,KEONJHAR vs. ACIT, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the all the assessees are dismissed

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.29 & 30/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Md. Mofazzalur Rahman, Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Serajuddin Square(Near Masjid) Bhubaneswar At/Po: Keonjhar-758001 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Abypr 0862 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.575 & 576/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) F.Serajuddin Exports (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aabcf 1469 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.577 &578/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Serajuddin & Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaics 3545 F & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.15/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2009-2010) Aliza International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Hig-19, Bda Housing Board Bhubaneswar Colony, Jaydev Vihar, Bhubaneswar-751013 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aafca 9579 A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.16 & 17/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Yazdani International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), 7Th Floor, C-Wing, Bhubaneswar Fortune Tower, Bhubaneswar-751023 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaacy 2872 M (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

271(l)(c) is initiated. Issued demand notice and a copy of the order.” 5. Accordingly, the AO framed the assessment u/s.143(3)/153A/144 of the Act assessing the total income of the assessee at Rs.6,140/- for the assessment year 2008-2009 vide order dated 29.12.2010. Thereafter the AO levied penalty u/s. 271F of the Act vide order dated

F SERAJUDDIN EXPORTS (P) LTD,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the all the assessees are dismissed

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.29 & 30/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Md. Mofazzalur Rahman, Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Serajuddin Square(Near Masjid) Bhubaneswar At/Po: Keonjhar-758001 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Abypr 0862 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.575 & 576/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) F.Serajuddin Exports (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aabcf 1469 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.577 &578/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Serajuddin & Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaics 3545 F & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.15/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2009-2010) Aliza International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Hig-19, Bda Housing Board Bhubaneswar Colony, Jaydev Vihar, Bhubaneswar-751013 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aafca 9579 A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.16 & 17/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Yazdani International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), 7Th Floor, C-Wing, Bhubaneswar Fortune Tower, Bhubaneswar-751023 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaacy 2872 M (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

271(l)(c) is initiated. Issued demand notice and a copy of the order.” 5. Accordingly, the AO framed the assessment u/s.143(3)/153A/144 of the Act assessing the total income of the assessee at Rs.6,140/- for the assessment year 2008-2009 vide order dated 29.12.2010. Thereafter the AO levied penalty u/s. 271F of the Act vide order dated

YAZDANI INTERNATIONAL (P) LTD,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1(2), BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the all the assessees are dismissed

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.29 & 30/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Md. Mofazzalur Rahman, Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Serajuddin Square(Near Masjid) Bhubaneswar At/Po: Keonjhar-758001 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Abypr 0862 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.575 & 576/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) F.Serajuddin Exports (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aabcf 1469 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.577 &578/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Serajuddin & Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaics 3545 F & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.15/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2009-2010) Aliza International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Hig-19, Bda Housing Board Bhubaneswar Colony, Jaydev Vihar, Bhubaneswar-751013 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aafca 9579 A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.16 & 17/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Yazdani International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), 7Th Floor, C-Wing, Bhubaneswar Fortune Tower, Bhubaneswar-751023 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaacy 2872 M (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

271(l)(c) is initiated. Issued demand notice and a copy of the order.” 5. Accordingly, the AO framed the assessment u/s.143(3)/153A/144 of the Act assessing the total income of the assessee at Rs.6,140/- for the assessment year 2008-2009 vide order dated 29.12.2010. Thereafter the AO levied penalty u/s. 271F of the Act vide order dated

MD. MOFAZZALUR RAHAMAN,KEONJHAR vs. ACIT, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the all the assessees are dismissed

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.29 & 30/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Md. Mofazzalur Rahman, Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Serajuddin Square(Near Masjid) Bhubaneswar At/Po: Keonjhar-758001 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Abypr 0862 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.575 & 576/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) F.Serajuddin Exports (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aabcf 1469 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.577 &578/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Serajuddin & Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaics 3545 F & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.15/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2009-2010) Aliza International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Hig-19, Bda Housing Board Bhubaneswar Colony, Jaydev Vihar, Bhubaneswar-751013 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aafca 9579 A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.16 & 17/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Yazdani International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), 7Th Floor, C-Wing, Bhubaneswar Fortune Tower, Bhubaneswar-751023 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaacy 2872 M (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

271(l)(c) is initiated. Issued demand notice and a copy of the order.” 5. Accordingly, the AO framed the assessment u/s.143(3)/153A/144 of the Act assessing the total income of the assessee at Rs.6,140/- for the assessment year 2008-2009 vide order dated 29.12.2010. Thereafter the AO levied penalty u/s. 271F of the Act vide order dated

F SERAJUDDIN EXPORTS (P) LTD,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the all the assessees are dismissed

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.29 & 30/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Md. Mofazzalur Rahman, Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Serajuddin Square(Near Masjid) Bhubaneswar At/Po: Keonjhar-758001 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Abypr 0862 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.575 & 576/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) F.Serajuddin Exports (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aabcf 1469 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.577 &578/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Serajuddin & Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaics 3545 F & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.15/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2009-2010) Aliza International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Hig-19, Bda Housing Board Bhubaneswar Colony, Jaydev Vihar, Bhubaneswar-751013 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aafca 9579 A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.16 & 17/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Yazdani International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), 7Th Floor, C-Wing, Bhubaneswar Fortune Tower, Bhubaneswar-751023 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaacy 2872 M (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

271(l)(c) is initiated. Issued demand notice and a copy of the order.” 5. Accordingly, the AO framed the assessment u/s.143(3)/153A/144 of the Act assessing the total income of the assessee at Rs.6,140/- for the assessment year 2008-2009 vide order dated 29.12.2010. Thereafter the AO levied penalty u/s. 271F of the Act vide order dated

SERAJUDDIN & CO. (P) LTD,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the all the assessees are dismissed

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.29 & 30/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Md. Mofazzalur Rahman, Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Serajuddin Square(Near Masjid) Bhubaneswar At/Po: Keonjhar-758001 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Abypr 0862 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.575 & 576/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) F.Serajuddin Exports (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aabcf 1469 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.577 &578/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Serajuddin & Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaics 3545 F & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.15/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2009-2010) Aliza International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Hig-19, Bda Housing Board Bhubaneswar Colony, Jaydev Vihar, Bhubaneswar-751013 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aafca 9579 A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.16 & 17/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Yazdani International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), 7Th Floor, C-Wing, Bhubaneswar Fortune Tower, Bhubaneswar-751023 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaacy 2872 M (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

271(l)(c) is initiated. Issued demand notice and a copy of the order.” 5. Accordingly, the AO framed the assessment u/s.143(3)/153A/144 of the Act assessing the total income of the assessee at Rs.6,140/- for the assessment year 2008-2009 vide order dated 29.12.2010. Thereafter the AO levied penalty u/s. 271F of the Act vide order dated

SERAJUDDIN & CO. (P) LTD,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the all the assessees are dismissed

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.29 & 30/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Md. Mofazzalur Rahman, Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Serajuddin Square(Near Masjid) Bhubaneswar At/Po: Keonjhar-758001 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Abypr 0862 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.575 & 576/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) F.Serajuddin Exports (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aabcf 1469 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.577 &578/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Serajuddin & Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaics 3545 F & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.15/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2009-2010) Aliza International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Hig-19, Bda Housing Board Bhubaneswar Colony, Jaydev Vihar, Bhubaneswar-751013 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aafca 9579 A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.16 & 17/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Yazdani International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), 7Th Floor, C-Wing, Bhubaneswar Fortune Tower, Bhubaneswar-751023 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaacy 2872 M (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

271(l)(c) is initiated. Issued demand notice and a copy of the order.” 5. Accordingly, the AO framed the assessment u/s.143(3)/153A/144 of the Act assessing the total income of the assessee at Rs.6,140/- for the assessment year 2008-2009 vide order dated 29.12.2010. Thereafter the AO levied penalty u/s. 271F of the Act vide order dated

SAROSH YAZDANI,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-2(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand allowed

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpiait(Ss)A No A No.53/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2004-05 It(Ss)A No A No.54/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2005-06 It(Ss)A No A No.55/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2007-08 It(Ss)A No A No.67/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2006-07 It(Ss)A No A No.68/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2008-09

u/s. 153A has been issued. This being so, we are of the view that the assessee had a valid ground for non-filing of return. Accordingly, penalty levied by the AO and confirmed by the ld CIT(A) is deleted.” 11. In reply, ld CIT DR vehemently supported the order of the AO and ld CIT(A). 12. We have

SAROSH YAZDANI,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-2(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand allowed

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpiait(Ss)A No A No.53/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2004-05 It(Ss)A No A No.54/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2005-06 It(Ss)A No A No.55/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2007-08 It(Ss)A No A No.67/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2006-07 It(Ss)A No A No.68/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2008-09

u/s. 153A has been issued. This being so, we are of the view that the assessee had a valid ground for non-filing of return. Accordingly, penalty levied by the AO and confirmed by the ld CIT(A) is deleted.” 11. In reply, ld CIT DR vehemently supported the order of the AO and ld CIT(A). 12. We have

SAROSH YAZDANI,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-2(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand allowed

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpiait(Ss)A No A No.53/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2004-05 It(Ss)A No A No.54/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2005-06 It(Ss)A No A No.55/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2007-08 It(Ss)A No A No.67/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2006-07 It(Ss)A No A No.68/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2008-09

u/s. 153A has been issued. This being so, we are of the view that the assessee had a valid ground for non-filing of return. Accordingly, penalty levied by the AO and confirmed by the ld CIT(A) is deleted.” 11. In reply, ld CIT DR vehemently supported the order of the AO and ld CIT(A). 12. We have

SAROSH YAZDANI,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1(2), BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand allowed

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpiait(Ss)A No A No.53/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2004-05 It(Ss)A No A No.54/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2005-06 It(Ss)A No A No.55/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2007-08 It(Ss)A No A No.67/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2006-07 It(Ss)A No A No.68/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2008-09

u/s. 153A has been issued. This being so, we are of the view that the assessee had a valid ground for non-filing of return. Accordingly, penalty levied by the AO and confirmed by the ld CIT(A) is deleted.” 11. In reply, ld CIT DR vehemently supported the order of the AO and ld CIT(A). 12. We have

SAROSH YAZDANI,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-2(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand allowed

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpiait(Ss)A No A No.53/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2004-05 It(Ss)A No A No.54/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2005-06 It(Ss)A No A No.55/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2007-08 It(Ss)A No A No.67/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2006-07 It(Ss)A No A No.68/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2008-09

u/s. 153A has been issued. This being so, we are of the view that the assessee had a valid ground for non-filing of return. Accordingly, penalty levied by the AO and confirmed by the ld CIT(A) is deleted.” 11. In reply, ld CIT DR vehemently supported the order of the AO and ld CIT(A). 12. We have

SAROSH YAZDANI,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1(2), BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand allowed

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpiait(Ss)A No A No.53/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2004-05 It(Ss)A No A No.54/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2005-06 It(Ss)A No A No.55/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2007-08 It(Ss)A No A No.67/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2006-07 It(Ss)A No A No.68/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2008-09

u/s. 153A has been issued. This being so, we are of the view that the assessee had a valid ground for non-filing of return. Accordingly, penalty levied by the AO and confirmed by the ld CIT(A) is deleted.” 11. In reply, ld CIT DR vehemently supported the order of the AO and ld CIT(A). 12. We have

SAROSH YAZDANI,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-2(1), BHUBANESWAAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand allowed

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpiait(Ss)A No A No.53/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2004-05 It(Ss)A No A No.54/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2005-06 It(Ss)A No A No.55/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2007-08 It(Ss)A No A No.67/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2006-07 It(Ss)A No A No.68/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2008-09

u/s. 153A has been issued. This being so, we are of the view that the assessee had a valid ground for non-filing of return. Accordingly, penalty levied by the AO and confirmed by the ld CIT(A) is deleted.” 11. In reply, ld CIT DR vehemently supported the order of the AO and ld CIT(A). 12. We have

SAI SIMRAN INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,NFAC,DELHI, NFAC DELHI

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

section 151 of the Act of obtaining sanction of the higher authorities, therefore, the notice issued u/s 148 of the Act is bad in law. Consequently we quashed the impugned notice dt. 31.03.2021 issued u/s 148 and subsequent re-assessment order passed on the basis of the impugned notice also quashed. Since we have quashed the reassessment order therefore, other

SAI SIMRAN INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-1(1), BHUBANESWAR,ODISHA

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

section 151 of the Act of obtaining sanction of the higher authorities, therefore, the notice issued u/s 148 of the Act is bad in law. Consequently we quashed the impugned notice dt. 31.03.2021 issued u/s 148 and subsequent re-assessment order passed on the basis of the impugned notice also quashed. Since we have quashed the reassessment order therefore, other

SAI SIMRAN INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR,ODISHA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-1(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

section 151 of the Act of obtaining sanction of the higher authorities, therefore, the notice issued u/s 148 of the Act is bad in law. Consequently we quashed the impugned notice dt. 31.03.2021 issued u/s 148 and subsequent re-assessment order passed on the basis of the impugned notice also quashed. Since we have quashed the reassessment order therefore, other

SAI SIMRAN INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR,ODISHA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-1(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

section 151 of the Act of obtaining sanction of the higher authorities, therefore, the notice issued u/s 148 of the Act is bad in law. Consequently we quashed the impugned notice dt. 31.03.2021 issued u/s 148 and subsequent re-assessment order passed on the basis of the impugned notice also quashed. Since we have quashed the reassessment order therefore, other