BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 269Tclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai82Delhi69Jaipur41Indore25Hyderabad24Bangalore24Pune20Chennai16Kolkata13Ahmedabad10Visakhapatnam10Cochin6Cuttack4Lucknow3Nagpur2Chandigarh2Amritsar2Surat2Rajkot1Jodhpur1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 271D11Section 269S10Section 269T4Penalty4Section 2713Section 1322Addition to Income2Search & Seizure2

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. HOTEL SUKHAMAYA PVT. LTD, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the three appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 205/CTK/2022[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Sept 2024AY 2009-10
Section 132Section 269SSection 271D

penalty levied u/s.271D of the Act. The relevant observations of the Hon’ble High Court are as under :- 5. Heard learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Revenue and perused the materials placed before this Court. 6. In the decision reported in 304 ITR 417 (CIT V. Rugmini Ram Raghav Spinners Private Limited), this Court had an occasion to consider

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. HOTEL SUKHAMAYA PVT. LTD, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the three appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 206/CTK/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack
18 Sept 2024
AY 2012-13
Section 132Section 269SSection 271D

penalty levied u/s.271D of the Act. The relevant observations of the Hon’ble High Court are as under :- 5. Heard learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Revenue and perused the materials placed before this Court. 6. In the decision reported in 304 ITR 417 (CIT V. Rugmini Ram Raghav Spinners Private Limited), this Court had an occasion to consider

M/S. SHREE SAI ENTERPRISES,BHUBANESWAR vs. ADDL. CIT, RANGE-4, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 290/CTK/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack23 Aug 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Gargassessment Year: 2014-2015

For Appellant: Shri N.R.BiswalFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR
Section 156Section 269SSection 271D

u/s. 143(2) & 142(1) of the Act were issued to the assessee. In response to the same, Id. AR appeared and case of the assessee was discussed. Thereafter the AO completed the assessment making various additions. The Assessing Officer noticed that the assessee has accepted cash loan amounting to Rs.9,74,499/- from various person in violation of provisions

M/S. BHAGABATI AGENCY,JAGATSINGHPUR vs. JCIT, RANGE-1, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 372/CTK/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack08 May 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year : 2006-07

For Appellant: Shri P.K.Jena, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Pradhan, DR
Section 269Section 269TSection 271

penalty U/s. 271 E of the Income Tax Act. 5. That in the present appeal the following pure questions of law arises for consideration: i) Whether repayment of any loan or deposit of Rs.20,000.00 or more through set-off by journal entries violate Section 269T