Search: penalty u/s 271

3 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 220(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Addition to Income3 Section 1482 Section 143(3)2 Section 402 Reopening of Assessment2 Condonation of Delay2

M/S. VINAYAK AGRO INDUSTRIES,ROURKELA vs. ITO WARD-4, ROURKELA

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 107/CTK/2023[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack22 Nov 2023AY 2009-10

For Appellant: Shri N.K.Rout, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 148

U/s 143(3)/Sec.147/Sec.263 of the Act determining total income of Rs.11,26,350/- on the basis of incomparable turnover of the giant companies in a perfunctory and ad hoc manner. The Ld. AO also initiated penalty proceeding under Section 271 (1 )(c) of the Act. 1.11. The Assessment Order dated 30-12-2019 passed by Ld .ITO was carried

M/S. VINAYAK AGRO INDUSTRIES,ROURKELA vs. ITO WARD-4, ROURKELA

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

M/S. VINAYAK AGRO INDUSTRIES,ROURKELA vs. ITO WARD-4, ROURKELA

M/S. VINAYAK AGRO INDUSTRIES,ROURKELA vs. ITO WARD-4, ROURKELA

M/S. VINAYAK AGRO INDUSTRIES,ROURKELA vs. ITO WARD-4, ROURKELA

M/S. VINAYAK AGRO INDUSTRIES,ROURKELA vs. ITO WARD-4, ROURKELA

ARSS INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS LTD.,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT, CORPORATION CIRCLE- 1(1), BHUBANESWAR