M/S. PRAKASH KUMAR ROUT,CUTTACK vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, CUTTACK

In the result, all the appeals of the all the assessees are allowed

E R Per Bench: The above captioned appeals filed at the instance of different assessees, are directed against the order passed by the CIT(A)-2, Bhubaneswar, dated 29.11.2017 for the assessment years 2013-2014 & 2014-2015. 2. At the outset, on perusal of the record, we found that all the appeals of the assessees are barred by limitation

M/S. PASUPATI BREEDING FARM PVT. LTD.,CUTTACK vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, CUTTACK

In the result, all the appeals of the all the assessees are allowed

E R Per Bench: The above captioned appeals filed at the instance of different assessees, are directed against the order passed by the CIT(A)-2, Bhubaneswar, dated 29.11.2017 for the assessment years 2013-2014 & 2014-2015. 2. At the outset, on perusal of the record, we found that all the appeals of the assessees are barred by limitation

M/S. PRAGATI MILK PRODUCT PVT. LTD.,CUTTACK vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, CUTTACK

In the result, all the appeals of the all the assessees are allowed

E R Per Bench: The above captioned appeals filed at the instance of different assessees, are directed against the order passed by the CIT(A)-2, Bhubaneswar, dated 29.11.2017 for the assessment years 2013-2014 & 2014-2015. 2. At the outset, on perusal of the record, we found that all the appeals of the assessees are barred by limitation

M/S. ALTRADE MINERALS PVT. LIMITED,ROURKELA vs. ACIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR, SAMBALPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Before Shri George Mathanmember & Manish Agarwal Manish Agarwalassessment Year : 2011-12 M/S. Altrade Minerals Pvt /S. Altrade Minerals Pvt Vs. Asst. Asst. Commissioner Commissioner Of Of Ltd., C/O. Kadmawala & Co., C/O. Kadmawala & Co., Income Tax, Central Circle, Income Tax, Central Circle, C.A., C.A., Budhram Budhram Oram Oram Sambalpur Market, Market, Kachery Kachery Road, Road, Rourkela. Pan/Gir No. No.Aafca 7136 F (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By : Shri M.R.Sahu, Ca Revenue By : Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr Dr : Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr Dr Date Of Hearing : 16/12/20 2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 16/12/20 024

u/s 2(7A) by virtue of an order u/s.120(4)(b) for conducting assessment proceedings he is mandatorily required to serve a notice u/s.143(2). In the instant case, we find that notice u/s.143(2) has not been issued by the It.CIT as required in the Statute and no order u/s.127(1) was passed for transferring jurisdiction from the ACIT

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. HOTEL SUKHAMAYA PVT. LTD, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the three appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

penalty levied u/s.271D of the Act. The relevant observations of the Hon’ble High Court are as under :- 5. Heard learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Revenue and perused the materials placed before this Court. 6. In the decision reported in 304 ITR 417 (CIT V. Rugmini Ram Raghav Spinners Private Limited), this Court had an occasion to consider

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. HOTEL SUKHAMAYA PVT. LTD, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the three appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

penalty levied u/s.271D of the Act. The relevant observations of the Hon’ble High Court are as under :- 5. Heard learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Revenue and perused the materials placed before this Court. 6. In the decision reported in 304 ITR 417 (CIT V. Rugmini Ram Raghav Spinners Private Limited), this Court had an occasion to consider

TRIJAL ENTERPRISE PRIVATE LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumarआयकर अपील सं/Ita No.261, 262 & 263/Ctk/2025 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20) Trijal Enterprise Private Limited Vs Acit, Central Circle-2, At-Hall No.6, Block-2, Bmc Bhubaneswar Bhawani Mall, Saheed Nagar, Khordha-751007, Bhubaneswar Pan No. :Aafct 9662 B (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) नििााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri P.K.Mishra, Ar राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Ashim Kumar Chakraborty, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 02/12/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 02/12/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Three Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Passed By The Ld. Cit(A), Bhubaneswar-2, All Dated 25.03.2025 For The Assessment Years 2017-2018, 2018-2019 & 2019-2020 Confirming The Penalty Levy Under 270A Of The Act. 2. It Was Submitted By The Ld. Ar That For The Impugned Assessment Years The Assessee Has Filed Original Return For The Assessment Year 2017- 18 Disclosing A Loss Of Rs.8,30,930/-, For The Assessment Year 2018-19 Income Of Rs.20,46,140/- & For Assessment Year 2019-20 An Income Of Rs.17,27,850/-. There Was A Search On The Premises Of The Assessee On 03/04/2019. In Response To Notice Issued U/S.153A Of The Act, The Assessee Filed His Return Of Income For The Assessment Year 2017-18 Disclosing A Loss

E R Per Bench : These are the three appeals filed by the assessee against the separate orders passed by the ld. CIT(A), Bhubaneswar-2, all dated 25.03.2025 for the assessment years 2017-2018, 2018-2019 & 2019-2020 confirming the penalty levy under 270A of the Act. 2. It was submitted by the Ld. AR that for the impugned assessment

TRIJAL ENTERPRISE PRIVATE LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2,BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumarआयकर अपील सं/Ita No.261, 262 & 263/Ctk/2025 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20) Trijal Enterprise Private Limited Vs Acit, Central Circle-2, At-Hall No.6, Block-2, Bmc Bhubaneswar Bhawani Mall, Saheed Nagar, Khordha-751007, Bhubaneswar Pan No. :Aafct 9662 B (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) नििााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri P.K.Mishra, Ar राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Ashim Kumar Chakraborty, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 02/12/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 02/12/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Three Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Passed By The Ld. Cit(A), Bhubaneswar-2, All Dated 25.03.2025 For The Assessment Years 2017-2018, 2018-2019 & 2019-2020 Confirming The Penalty Levy Under 270A Of The Act. 2. It Was Submitted By The Ld. Ar That For The Impugned Assessment Years The Assessee Has Filed Original Return For The Assessment Year 2017- 18 Disclosing A Loss Of Rs.8,30,930/-, For The Assessment Year 2018-19 Income Of Rs.20,46,140/- & For Assessment Year 2019-20 An Income Of Rs.17,27,850/-. There Was A Search On The Premises Of The Assessee On 03/04/2019. In Response To Notice Issued U/S.153A Of The Act, The Assessee Filed His Return Of Income For The Assessment Year 2017-18 Disclosing A Loss

E R Per Bench : These are the three appeals filed by the assessee against the separate orders passed by the ld. CIT(A), Bhubaneswar-2, all dated 25.03.2025 for the assessment years 2017-2018, 2018-2019 & 2019-2020 confirming the penalty levy under 270A of the Act. 2. It was submitted by the Ld. AR that for the impugned assessment

TRIJAL ENTERPRISE PRIVATE LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2,BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumarआयकर अपील सं/Ita No.261, 262 & 263/Ctk/2025 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20) Trijal Enterprise Private Limited Vs Acit, Central Circle-2, At-Hall No.6, Block-2, Bmc Bhubaneswar Bhawani Mall, Saheed Nagar, Khordha-751007, Bhubaneswar Pan No. :Aafct 9662 B (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) नििााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri P.K.Mishra, Ar राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Ashim Kumar Chakraborty, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 02/12/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 02/12/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Three Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Passed By The Ld. Cit(A), Bhubaneswar-2, All Dated 25.03.2025 For The Assessment Years 2017-2018, 2018-2019 & 2019-2020 Confirming The Penalty Levy Under 270A Of The Act. 2. It Was Submitted By The Ld. Ar That For The Impugned Assessment Years The Assessee Has Filed Original Return For The Assessment Year 2017- 18 Disclosing A Loss Of Rs.8,30,930/-, For The Assessment Year 2018-19 Income Of Rs.20,46,140/- & For Assessment Year 2019-20 An Income Of Rs.17,27,850/-. There Was A Search On The Premises Of The Assessee On 03/04/2019. In Response To Notice Issued U/S.153A Of The Act, The Assessee Filed His Return Of Income For The Assessment Year 2017-18 Disclosing A Loss

E R Per Bench : These are the three appeals filed by the assessee against the separate orders passed by the ld. CIT(A), Bhubaneswar-2, all dated 25.03.2025 for the assessment years 2017-2018, 2018-2019 & 2019-2020 confirming the penalty levy under 270A of the Act. 2. It was submitted by the Ld. AR that for the impugned assessment

SAMBIT RESORTS PVT. LTD.,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadale

E R Per N.S.Saini, AM These are appeals filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A)— 1, Bhubaneswar, dated 28.3.2014 for the assessment year 2005-06 and dated 21.8.2015 for the assessment year 2006-07. 2. The common ground of appeal raised in these appeals by the assessee is that the CIT(A) is not justified in confirming

ACIT(CIRCLE-1(1),, SAMBALPUR vs. M/S. TRL KROSAKI REFRACTORIES LIMITED, JHARSUGUDHA

In the result, appeals of the revenue for the assessment years 2010-

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpiaita No.260 260/Ctk/2020: Assessment Year Assessment Year :2010-2011

2) and as no such draft assessment order has been served on the assessee, the ld CIT(A) annulled the assessment order for three assessment years, hence, same was liable to be upheld. 12. In respect of assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15, it was submitted by ld AR that for these two assessment years, though the draft assessment

ACIT,CIRCLE-1(1), SAMBALPUR, SAMBALPUR vs. M/S. TRL KROSAKI REFRACTORIES LIMITED, JHARSUGUDHA

In the result, appeals of the revenue for the assessment years 2010-

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpiaita No.260 260/Ctk/2020: Assessment Year Assessment Year :2010-2011

2) and as no such draft assessment order has been served on the assessee, the ld CIT(A) annulled the assessment order for three assessment years, hence, same was liable to be upheld. 12. In respect of assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15, it was submitted by ld AR that for these two assessment years, though the draft assessment

ACIT,CIRCLE-1(!), SAMBALPUR vs. M/S. TRL KROSAKI REFRACTORIES LIMITED, JHARSUGUDHA

In the result, appeals of the revenue for the assessment years 2010-

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpiaita No.260 260/Ctk/2020: Assessment Year Assessment Year :2010-2011

2) and as no such draft assessment order has been served on the assessee, the ld CIT(A) annulled the assessment order for three assessment years, hence, same was liable to be upheld. 12. In respect of assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15, it was submitted by ld AR that for these two assessment years, though the draft assessment

ACIT,CIRCLE-1(1),, SAMBALPUR vs. M/S. TRL KROSAKI REFRACTORIES LIMITED, JHARSUGUDHA

In the result, appeals of the revenue for the assessment years 2010-

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpiaita No.260 260/Ctk/2020: Assessment Year Assessment Year :2010-2011

2) and as no such draft assessment order has been served on the assessee, the ld CIT(A) annulled the assessment order for three assessment years, hence, same was liable to be upheld. 12. In respect of assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15, it was submitted by ld AR that for these two assessment years, though the draft assessment

ACIT,CIRCLE-1(1), SAMBALPUR vs. M/S. TRL KROSAKI REFRACTORIES LIMITED, JHARASUGUDHA

In the result, appeals of the revenue for the assessment years 2010-

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpiaita No.260 260/Ctk/2020: Assessment Year Assessment Year :2010-2011

2) and as no such draft assessment order has been served on the assessee, the ld CIT(A) annulled the assessment order for three assessment years, hence, same was liable to be upheld. 12. In respect of assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15, it was submitted by ld AR that for these two assessment years, though the draft assessment

MD. MOFAZZALUR RAHAMAN,KEONJHAR vs. ACIT, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the all the assessees are dismissed

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.29 & 30/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Md. Mofazzalur Rahman, Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Serajuddin Square(Near Masjid) Bhubaneswar At/Po: Keonjhar-758001 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Abypr 0862 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.575 & 576/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) F.Serajuddin Exports (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aabcf 1469 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.577 &578/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Serajuddin & Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaics 3545 F & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.15/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2009-2010) Aliza International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Hig-19, Bda Housing Board Bhubaneswar Colony, Jaydev Vihar, Bhubaneswar-751013 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aafca 9579 A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.16 & 17/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Yazdani International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), 7Th Floor, C-Wing, Bhubaneswar Fortune Tower, Bhubaneswar-751023 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaacy 2872 M (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

E R Per Bench : These are the appeals filed by different assessees, as mentioned above, against the separate orders of CIT(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, dated 15.11.2013, 24.10.2013, 25.10.2013, 07.11.2013 & 05.11.2013 arising out of the order dated 30.06.2011, whereby confirming the penalty levied u/s.271F of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) for the assessment years

YAZDANI INTERNATIONAL (P) LTD,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1(2), BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the all the assessees are dismissed

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.29 & 30/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Md. Mofazzalur Rahman, Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Serajuddin Square(Near Masjid) Bhubaneswar At/Po: Keonjhar-758001 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Abypr 0862 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.575 & 576/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) F.Serajuddin Exports (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aabcf 1469 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.577 &578/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Serajuddin & Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaics 3545 F & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.15/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2009-2010) Aliza International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Hig-19, Bda Housing Board Bhubaneswar Colony, Jaydev Vihar, Bhubaneswar-751013 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aafca 9579 A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.16 & 17/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Yazdani International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), 7Th Floor, C-Wing, Bhubaneswar Fortune Tower, Bhubaneswar-751023 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaacy 2872 M (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

E R Per Bench : These are the appeals filed by different assessees, as mentioned above, against the separate orders of CIT(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, dated 15.11.2013, 24.10.2013, 25.10.2013, 07.11.2013 & 05.11.2013 arising out of the order dated 30.06.2011, whereby confirming the penalty levied u/s.271F of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) for the assessment years

F SERAJUDDIN EXPORTS (P) LTD,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the all the assessees are dismissed

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.29 & 30/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Md. Mofazzalur Rahman, Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Serajuddin Square(Near Masjid) Bhubaneswar At/Po: Keonjhar-758001 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Abypr 0862 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.575 & 576/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) F.Serajuddin Exports (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aabcf 1469 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.577 &578/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Serajuddin & Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaics 3545 F & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.15/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2009-2010) Aliza International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Hig-19, Bda Housing Board Bhubaneswar Colony, Jaydev Vihar, Bhubaneswar-751013 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aafca 9579 A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.16 & 17/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Yazdani International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), 7Th Floor, C-Wing, Bhubaneswar Fortune Tower, Bhubaneswar-751023 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaacy 2872 M (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

E R Per Bench : These are the appeals filed by different assessees, as mentioned above, against the separate orders of CIT(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, dated 15.11.2013, 24.10.2013, 25.10.2013, 07.11.2013 & 05.11.2013 arising out of the order dated 30.06.2011, whereby confirming the penalty levied u/s.271F of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) for the assessment years