M/S. PRAKASH KUMAR ROUT,CUTTACK vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, CUTTACK

In the result, all the appeals of the all the assessees are allowed

271 shall be imposed upon the assessee in respect of the undisclosed income referred to in sub-section (1). (3) The provisions of sections 274 and 275 shall, as far as may be, apply in relation to the penalty referred to in this section. Explanation.--For the purposes of this section,-- (a) "specified date" means the due date of furnishing

M/S. PASUPATI BREEDING FARM PVT. LTD.,CUTTACK vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, CUTTACK

In the result, all the appeals of the all the assessees are allowed

271 shall be imposed upon the assessee in respect of the undisclosed income referred to in sub-section (1). (3) The provisions of sections 274 and 275 shall, as far as may be, apply in relation to the penalty referred to in this section. Explanation.--For the purposes of this section,-- (a) "specified date" means the due date of furnishing

M/S. PRAGATI MILK PRODUCT PVT. LTD.,CUTTACK vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, CUTTACK

In the result, all the appeals of the all the assessees are allowed

271 shall be imposed upon the assessee in respect of the undisclosed income referred to in sub-section (1). (3) The provisions of sections 274 and 275 shall, as far as may be, apply in relation to the penalty referred to in this section. Explanation.--For the purposes of this section,-- (a) "specified date" means the due date of furnishing

TRIJAL ENTERPRISE PRIVATE LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumarआयकर अपील सं/Ita No.261, 262 & 263/Ctk/2025 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20) Trijal Enterprise Private Limited Vs Acit, Central Circle-2, At-Hall No.6, Block-2, Bmc Bhubaneswar Bhawani Mall, Saheed Nagar, Khordha-751007, Bhubaneswar Pan No. :Aafct 9662 B (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) नििााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri P.K.Mishra, Ar राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Ashim Kumar Chakraborty, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 02/12/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 02/12/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Three Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Passed By The Ld. Cit(A), Bhubaneswar-2, All Dated 25.03.2025 For The Assessment Years 2017-2018, 2018-2019 & 2019-2020 Confirming The Penalty Levy Under 270A Of The Act. 2. It Was Submitted By The Ld. Ar That For The Impugned Assessment Years The Assessee Has Filed Original Return For The Assessment Year 2017- 18 Disclosing A Loss Of Rs.8,30,930/-, For The Assessment Year 2018-19 Income Of Rs.20,46,140/- & For Assessment Year 2019-20 An Income Of Rs.17,27,850/-. There Was A Search On The Premises Of The Assessee On 03/04/2019. In Response To Notice Issued U/S.153A Of The Act, The Assessee Filed His Return Of Income For The Assessment Year 2017-18 Disclosing A Loss

b)/(c) of section 271AAB of the Act. He should have further mentioned that as the assesseee's case falls under Clause-c of section 271AAB of the Act, why he should not be visited by the penalty (ee. 30% of the undisclosed income. Against this charge. the assessee should have been given reasonable opportunity of being heard. 10. From

TRIJAL ENTERPRISE PRIVATE LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2,BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumarआयकर अपील सं/Ita No.261, 262 & 263/Ctk/2025 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20) Trijal Enterprise Private Limited Vs Acit, Central Circle-2, At-Hall No.6, Block-2, Bmc Bhubaneswar Bhawani Mall, Saheed Nagar, Khordha-751007, Bhubaneswar Pan No. :Aafct 9662 B (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) नििााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri P.K.Mishra, Ar राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Ashim Kumar Chakraborty, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 02/12/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 02/12/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Three Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Passed By The Ld. Cit(A), Bhubaneswar-2, All Dated 25.03.2025 For The Assessment Years 2017-2018, 2018-2019 & 2019-2020 Confirming The Penalty Levy Under 270A Of The Act. 2. It Was Submitted By The Ld. Ar That For The Impugned Assessment Years The Assessee Has Filed Original Return For The Assessment Year 2017- 18 Disclosing A Loss Of Rs.8,30,930/-, For The Assessment Year 2018-19 Income Of Rs.20,46,140/- & For Assessment Year 2019-20 An Income Of Rs.17,27,850/-. There Was A Search On The Premises Of The Assessee On 03/04/2019. In Response To Notice Issued U/S.153A Of The Act, The Assessee Filed His Return Of Income For The Assessment Year 2017-18 Disclosing A Loss

b)/(c) of section 271AAB of the Act. He should have further mentioned that as the assesseee's case falls under Clause-c of section 271AAB of the Act, why he should not be visited by the penalty (ee. 30% of the undisclosed income. Against this charge. the assessee should have been given reasonable opportunity of being heard. 10. From

TRIJAL ENTERPRISE PRIVATE LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2,BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumarआयकर अपील सं/Ita No.261, 262 & 263/Ctk/2025 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20) Trijal Enterprise Private Limited Vs Acit, Central Circle-2, At-Hall No.6, Block-2, Bmc Bhubaneswar Bhawani Mall, Saheed Nagar, Khordha-751007, Bhubaneswar Pan No. :Aafct 9662 B (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) नििााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri P.K.Mishra, Ar राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Ashim Kumar Chakraborty, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 02/12/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 02/12/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Three Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Passed By The Ld. Cit(A), Bhubaneswar-2, All Dated 25.03.2025 For The Assessment Years 2017-2018, 2018-2019 & 2019-2020 Confirming The Penalty Levy Under 270A Of The Act. 2. It Was Submitted By The Ld. Ar That For The Impugned Assessment Years The Assessee Has Filed Original Return For The Assessment Year 2017- 18 Disclosing A Loss Of Rs.8,30,930/-, For The Assessment Year 2018-19 Income Of Rs.20,46,140/- & For Assessment Year 2019-20 An Income Of Rs.17,27,850/-. There Was A Search On The Premises Of The Assessee On 03/04/2019. In Response To Notice Issued U/S.153A Of The Act, The Assessee Filed His Return Of Income For The Assessment Year 2017-18 Disclosing A Loss

b)/(c) of section 271AAB of the Act. He should have further mentioned that as the assesseee's case falls under Clause-c of section 271AAB of the Act, why he should not be visited by the penalty (ee. 30% of the undisclosed income. Against this charge. the assessee should have been given reasonable opportunity of being heard. 10. From

M/S. ALTRADE MINERALS PVT. LIMITED,ROURKELA vs. ACIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR, SAMBALPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Before Shri George Mathanmember & Manish Agarwal Manish Agarwalassessment Year : 2011-12 M/S. Altrade Minerals Pvt /S. Altrade Minerals Pvt Vs. Asst. Asst. Commissioner Commissioner Of Of Ltd., C/O. Kadmawala & Co., C/O. Kadmawala & Co., Income Tax, Central Circle, Income Tax, Central Circle, C.A., C.A., Budhram Budhram Oram Oram Sambalpur Market, Market, Kachery Kachery Road, Road, Rourkela. Pan/Gir No. No.Aafca 7136 F (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By : Shri M.R.Sahu, Ca Revenue By : Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr Dr : Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr Dr Date Of Hearing : 16/12/20 2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 16/12/20 024

153A and 153C. Thereafter, the learned Tribunal relying on the decision of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in CIT v. Tollaram Hassomal ]2008] 298 itr 22(mp), remitted the matter to the Commissioner of income-tax (Appeals) with a direction to decide first the additional ground taken by the assessee in accordance with law and , if required, the other grounds

SAROSH YAZDANI,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-2(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand allowed

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpiait(Ss)A No A No.53/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2004-05 It(Ss)A No A No.54/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2005-06 It(Ss)A No A No.55/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2007-08 It(Ss)A No A No.67/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2006-07 It(Ss)A No A No.68/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2008-09

153A has been issued. This being so, we are of the view that the assessee had a valid ground for non-filing of return. Accordingly, penalty levied by the AO and confirmed by the ld CIT(A) is deleted.” 11. In reply, ld CIT DR vehemently supported the order of the AO and ld CIT(A). 12. We have considered

SAROSH YAZDANI,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-2(1), BHUBANESWAAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand allowed

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpiait(Ss)A No A No.53/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2004-05 It(Ss)A No A No.54/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2005-06 It(Ss)A No A No.55/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2007-08 It(Ss)A No A No.67/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2006-07 It(Ss)A No A No.68/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2008-09

153A has been issued. This being so, we are of the view that the assessee had a valid ground for non-filing of return. Accordingly, penalty levied by the AO and confirmed by the ld CIT(A) is deleted.” 11. In reply, ld CIT DR vehemently supported the order of the AO and ld CIT(A). 12. We have considered

SAROSH YAZDANI,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1(2), BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand allowed

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpiait(Ss)A No A No.53/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2004-05 It(Ss)A No A No.54/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2005-06 It(Ss)A No A No.55/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2007-08 It(Ss)A No A No.67/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2006-07 It(Ss)A No A No.68/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2008-09

153A has been issued. This being so, we are of the view that the assessee had a valid ground for non-filing of return. Accordingly, penalty levied by the AO and confirmed by the ld CIT(A) is deleted.” 11. In reply, ld CIT DR vehemently supported the order of the AO and ld CIT(A). 12. We have considered

SAROSH YAZDANI,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-2(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand allowed

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpiait(Ss)A No A No.53/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2004-05 It(Ss)A No A No.54/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2005-06 It(Ss)A No A No.55/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2007-08 It(Ss)A No A No.67/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2006-07 It(Ss)A No A No.68/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2008-09

153A has been issued. This being so, we are of the view that the assessee had a valid ground for non-filing of return. Accordingly, penalty levied by the AO and confirmed by the ld CIT(A) is deleted.” 11. In reply, ld CIT DR vehemently supported the order of the AO and ld CIT(A). 12. We have considered

SAROSH YAZDANI,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-2(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand allowed

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpiait(Ss)A No A No.53/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2004-05 It(Ss)A No A No.54/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2005-06 It(Ss)A No A No.55/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2007-08 It(Ss)A No A No.67/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2006-07 It(Ss)A No A No.68/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2008-09

153A has been issued. This being so, we are of the view that the assessee had a valid ground for non-filing of return. Accordingly, penalty levied by the AO and confirmed by the ld CIT(A) is deleted.” 11. In reply, ld CIT DR vehemently supported the order of the AO and ld CIT(A). 12. We have considered

SAROSH YAZDANI,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-2(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand allowed

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpiait(Ss)A No A No.53/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2004-05 It(Ss)A No A No.54/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2005-06 It(Ss)A No A No.55/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2007-08 It(Ss)A No A No.67/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2006-07 It(Ss)A No A No.68/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2008-09

153A has been issued. This being so, we are of the view that the assessee had a valid ground for non-filing of return. Accordingly, penalty levied by the AO and confirmed by the ld CIT(A) is deleted.” 11. In reply, ld CIT DR vehemently supported the order of the AO and ld CIT(A). 12. We have considered

SAROSH YAZDANI,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1(2), BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand allowed

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpiait(Ss)A No A No.53/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2004-05 It(Ss)A No A No.54/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2005-06 It(Ss)A No A No.55/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2007-08 It(Ss)A No A No.67/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2006-07 It(Ss)A No A No.68/Ctk/2013: Assessment Year Assessment Years :2008-09

153A has been issued. This being so, we are of the view that the assessee had a valid ground for non-filing of return. Accordingly, penalty levied by the AO and confirmed by the ld CIT(A) is deleted.” 11. In reply, ld CIT DR vehemently supported the order of the AO and ld CIT(A). 12. We have considered

SERAJUDDIN & CO. (P) LTD,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the all the assessees are dismissed

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.29 & 30/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Md. Mofazzalur Rahman, Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Serajuddin Square(Near Masjid) Bhubaneswar At/Po: Keonjhar-758001 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Abypr 0862 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.575 & 576/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) F.Serajuddin Exports (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aabcf 1469 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.577 &578/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Serajuddin & Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaics 3545 F & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.15/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2009-2010) Aliza International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Hig-19, Bda Housing Board Bhubaneswar Colony, Jaydev Vihar, Bhubaneswar-751013 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aafca 9579 A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.16 & 17/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Yazdani International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), 7Th Floor, C-Wing, Bhubaneswar Fortune Tower, Bhubaneswar-751023 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaacy 2872 M (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

271(l)(c) is initiated. Issued demand notice and a copy of the order.” 5. Accordingly, the AO framed the assessment u/s.143(3)/153A/144 of the Act assessing the total income of the assessee at Rs.6,140/- for the assessment year 2008-2009 vide order dated 29.12.2010. Thereafter the AO levied penalty u/s. 271F of the Act vide order dated

MD. MOFAZZALUR RAHAMAN,KEONJHAR vs. ACIT, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the all the assessees are dismissed

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.29 & 30/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Md. Mofazzalur Rahman, Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Serajuddin Square(Near Masjid) Bhubaneswar At/Po: Keonjhar-758001 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Abypr 0862 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.575 & 576/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) F.Serajuddin Exports (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aabcf 1469 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.577 &578/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Serajuddin & Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaics 3545 F & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.15/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2009-2010) Aliza International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Hig-19, Bda Housing Board Bhubaneswar Colony, Jaydev Vihar, Bhubaneswar-751013 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aafca 9579 A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.16 & 17/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Yazdani International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), 7Th Floor, C-Wing, Bhubaneswar Fortune Tower, Bhubaneswar-751023 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaacy 2872 M (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

271(l)(c) is initiated. Issued demand notice and a copy of the order.” 5. Accordingly, the AO framed the assessment u/s.143(3)/153A/144 of the Act assessing the total income of the assessee at Rs.6,140/- for the assessment year 2008-2009 vide order dated 29.12.2010. Thereafter the AO levied penalty u/s. 271F of the Act vide order dated

F SERAJUDDIN EXPORTS (P) LTD,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the all the assessees are dismissed

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.29 & 30/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Md. Mofazzalur Rahman, Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Serajuddin Square(Near Masjid) Bhubaneswar At/Po: Keonjhar-758001 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Abypr 0862 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.575 & 576/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) F.Serajuddin Exports (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aabcf 1469 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.577 &578/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Serajuddin & Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaics 3545 F & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.15/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2009-2010) Aliza International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Hig-19, Bda Housing Board Bhubaneswar Colony, Jaydev Vihar, Bhubaneswar-751013 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aafca 9579 A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.16 & 17/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Yazdani International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), 7Th Floor, C-Wing, Bhubaneswar Fortune Tower, Bhubaneswar-751023 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaacy 2872 M (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

271(l)(c) is initiated. Issued demand notice and a copy of the order.” 5. Accordingly, the AO framed the assessment u/s.143(3)/153A/144 of the Act assessing the total income of the assessee at Rs.6,140/- for the assessment year 2008-2009 vide order dated 29.12.2010. Thereafter the AO levied penalty u/s. 271F of the Act vide order dated

MD. MOFAZZALUR RAHAMAN,KEONJHAR vs. ACIT, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the all the assessees are dismissed

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.29 & 30/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Md. Mofazzalur Rahman, Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Serajuddin Square(Near Masjid) Bhubaneswar At/Po: Keonjhar-758001 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Abypr 0862 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.575 & 576/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) F.Serajuddin Exports (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aabcf 1469 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.577 &578/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Serajuddin & Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaics 3545 F & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.15/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2009-2010) Aliza International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Hig-19, Bda Housing Board Bhubaneswar Colony, Jaydev Vihar, Bhubaneswar-751013 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aafca 9579 A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.16 & 17/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Yazdani International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), 7Th Floor, C-Wing, Bhubaneswar Fortune Tower, Bhubaneswar-751023 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaacy 2872 M (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

271(l)(c) is initiated. Issued demand notice and a copy of the order.” 5. Accordingly, the AO framed the assessment u/s.143(3)/153A/144 of the Act assessing the total income of the assessee at Rs.6,140/- for the assessment year 2008-2009 vide order dated 29.12.2010. Thereafter the AO levied penalty u/s. 271F of the Act vide order dated