BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

24 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 148clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,220Delhi1,183Jaipur394Ahmedabad361Surat254Pune250Kolkata221Bangalore213Chennai194Hyderabad171Indore161Chandigarh151Karnataka128Rajkot116Raipur96Visakhapatnam64Amritsar63Lucknow58Allahabad53Agra41Nagpur39Cochin38Patna38Calcutta35Guwahati28Cuttack24Jabalpur17Dehradun17Jodhpur14Panaji10Varanasi4Ranchi3SC3Telangana2Rajasthan2Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 271F56Section 14832Section 15116Penalty16Limitation/Time-bar13Section 153A11Addition to Income11Section 14710Section 269S8Section 153

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. HOTEL SUKHAMAYA PVT. LTD, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the three appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 206/CTK/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Sept 2024AY 2012-13
Section 132Section 269SSection 271D

148 was issued because assessee had not filed any return of income for assessment year 2003-04 and later years. The assessments were completed later on. This becomes clear from the assessment orders filed at pages 61 to 68 of the paper book. No additions have been made on account of share application money which clearly means that sources

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. HOTEL SUKHAMAYA PVT. LTD, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the three appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 205/CTK/2022[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack

Showing 1–20 of 24 · Page 1 of 2

8
Section 14A8
Reopening of Assessment8
18 Sept 2024
AY 2009-10
Section 132Section 269SSection 271D

148 was issued because assessee had not filed any return of income for assessment year 2003-04 and later years. The assessments were completed later on. This becomes clear from the assessment orders filed at pages 61 to 68 of the paper book. No additions have been made on account of share application money which clearly means that sources

SAI SIMRAN INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-1(1), BHUBANESWAR,ODISHA

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 86/CTK/2024[2015-16]Status: HeardITAT Cuttack04 Jun 2024AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Shri S.K.Agrawalla, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 271(1)(b)Section 271(1)(c)Section 69A

section 151 of the Act of obtaining sanction of the higher authorities, therefore, the notice issued u/s 148 of the Act is bad in law. Consequently we quashed the impugned notice dt. 31.03.2021 issued u/s 148 and subsequent re-assessment order passed on the basis of the impugned notice also quashed. Since we have quashed the reassessment order therefore, other

SAI SIMRAN INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,NFAC,DELHI, NFAC DELHI

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 87/CTK/2024[2015-16]Status: HeardITAT Cuttack04 Jun 2024AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Shri S.K.Agrawalla, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 271(1)(b)Section 271(1)(c)Section 69A

section 151 of the Act of obtaining sanction of the higher authorities, therefore, the notice issued u/s 148 of the Act is bad in law. Consequently we quashed the impugned notice dt. 31.03.2021 issued u/s 148 and subsequent re-assessment order passed on the basis of the impugned notice also quashed. Since we have quashed the reassessment order therefore, other

SAI SIMRAN INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR,ODISHA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-1(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 90/CTK/2024[2015-16]Status: HeardITAT Cuttack04 Jun 2024AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Shri S.K.Agrawalla, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 271(1)(b)Section 271(1)(c)Section 69A

section 151 of the Act of obtaining sanction of the higher authorities, therefore, the notice issued u/s 148 of the Act is bad in law. Consequently we quashed the impugned notice dt. 31.03.2021 issued u/s 148 and subsequent re-assessment order passed on the basis of the impugned notice also quashed. Since we have quashed the reassessment order therefore, other

SAI SIMRAN INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR,ODISHA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-1(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 91/CTK/2024[2015-16]Status: HeardITAT Cuttack04 Jun 2024AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Shri S.K.Agrawalla, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 271(1)(b)Section 271(1)(c)Section 69A

section 151 of the Act of obtaining sanction of the higher authorities, therefore, the notice issued u/s 148 of the Act is bad in law. Consequently we quashed the impugned notice dt. 31.03.2021 issued u/s 148 and subsequent re-assessment order passed on the basis of the impugned notice also quashed. Since we have quashed the reassessment order therefore, other

SERAJUDDIN & CO. (P) LTD,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the all the assessees are dismissed

ITA 578/CTK/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack14 Oct 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.29 & 30/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Md. Mofazzalur Rahman, Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Serajuddin Square(Near Masjid) Bhubaneswar At/Po: Keonjhar-758001 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Abypr 0862 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.575 & 576/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) F.Serajuddin Exports (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aabcf 1469 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.577 &578/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Serajuddin & Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaics 3545 F & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.15/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2009-2010) Aliza International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Hig-19, Bda Housing Board Bhubaneswar Colony, Jaydev Vihar, Bhubaneswar-751013 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aafca 9579 A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.16 & 17/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Yazdani International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), 7Th Floor, C-Wing, Bhubaneswar Fortune Tower, Bhubaneswar-751023 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaacy 2872 M (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri Suni Mishra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S.M.Keshkamat, CITDR
Section 153Section 153ASection 271F

271(l)(c) is initiated. Issued demand notice and a copy of the order.” 5. Accordingly, the AO framed the assessment u/s.143(3)/153A/144 of the Act assessing the total income of the assessee at Rs.6,140/- for the assessment year 2008-2009 vide order dated 29.12.2010. Thereafter the AO levied penalty u/s. 271F of the Act vide order dated

MD. MOFAZZALUR RAHAMAN,KEONJHAR vs. ACIT, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the all the assessees are dismissed

ITA 30/CTK/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack14 Oct 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.29 & 30/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Md. Mofazzalur Rahman, Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Serajuddin Square(Near Masjid) Bhubaneswar At/Po: Keonjhar-758001 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Abypr 0862 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.575 & 576/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) F.Serajuddin Exports (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aabcf 1469 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.577 &578/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Serajuddin & Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaics 3545 F & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.15/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2009-2010) Aliza International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Hig-19, Bda Housing Board Bhubaneswar Colony, Jaydev Vihar, Bhubaneswar-751013 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aafca 9579 A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.16 & 17/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Yazdani International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), 7Th Floor, C-Wing, Bhubaneswar Fortune Tower, Bhubaneswar-751023 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaacy 2872 M (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri Suni Mishra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S.M.Keshkamat, CITDR
Section 153Section 153ASection 271F

271(l)(c) is initiated. Issued demand notice and a copy of the order.” 5. Accordingly, the AO framed the assessment u/s.143(3)/153A/144 of the Act assessing the total income of the assessee at Rs.6,140/- for the assessment year 2008-2009 vide order dated 29.12.2010. Thereafter the AO levied penalty u/s. 271F of the Act vide order dated

SERAJUDDIN & CO. (P) LTD,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the all the assessees are dismissed

ITA 577/CTK/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack14 Oct 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.29 & 30/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Md. Mofazzalur Rahman, Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Serajuddin Square(Near Masjid) Bhubaneswar At/Po: Keonjhar-758001 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Abypr 0862 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.575 & 576/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) F.Serajuddin Exports (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aabcf 1469 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.577 &578/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Serajuddin & Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaics 3545 F & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.15/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2009-2010) Aliza International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Hig-19, Bda Housing Board Bhubaneswar Colony, Jaydev Vihar, Bhubaneswar-751013 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aafca 9579 A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.16 & 17/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Yazdani International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), 7Th Floor, C-Wing, Bhubaneswar Fortune Tower, Bhubaneswar-751023 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaacy 2872 M (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri Suni Mishra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S.M.Keshkamat, CITDR
Section 153Section 153ASection 271F

271(l)(c) is initiated. Issued demand notice and a copy of the order.” 5. Accordingly, the AO framed the assessment u/s.143(3)/153A/144 of the Act assessing the total income of the assessee at Rs.6,140/- for the assessment year 2008-2009 vide order dated 29.12.2010. Thereafter the AO levied penalty u/s. 271F of the Act vide order dated

ALIZA INTERNATIONAL (P) LTD,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1(2), BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the all the assessees are dismissed

ITA 15/CTK/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack14 Oct 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.29 & 30/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Md. Mofazzalur Rahman, Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Serajuddin Square(Near Masjid) Bhubaneswar At/Po: Keonjhar-758001 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Abypr 0862 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.575 & 576/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) F.Serajuddin Exports (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aabcf 1469 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.577 &578/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Serajuddin & Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaics 3545 F & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.15/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2009-2010) Aliza International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Hig-19, Bda Housing Board Bhubaneswar Colony, Jaydev Vihar, Bhubaneswar-751013 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aafca 9579 A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.16 & 17/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Yazdani International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), 7Th Floor, C-Wing, Bhubaneswar Fortune Tower, Bhubaneswar-751023 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaacy 2872 M (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri Suni Mishra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S.M.Keshkamat, CITDR
Section 153Section 153ASection 271F

271(l)(c) is initiated. Issued demand notice and a copy of the order.” 5. Accordingly, the AO framed the assessment u/s.143(3)/153A/144 of the Act assessing the total income of the assessee at Rs.6,140/- for the assessment year 2008-2009 vide order dated 29.12.2010. Thereafter the AO levied penalty u/s. 271F of the Act vide order dated

F SERAJUDDIN EXPORTS (P) LTD,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the all the assessees are dismissed

ITA 575/CTK/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack14 Oct 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.29 & 30/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Md. Mofazzalur Rahman, Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Serajuddin Square(Near Masjid) Bhubaneswar At/Po: Keonjhar-758001 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Abypr 0862 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.575 & 576/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) F.Serajuddin Exports (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aabcf 1469 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.577 &578/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Serajuddin & Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaics 3545 F & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.15/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2009-2010) Aliza International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Hig-19, Bda Housing Board Bhubaneswar Colony, Jaydev Vihar, Bhubaneswar-751013 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aafca 9579 A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.16 & 17/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Yazdani International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), 7Th Floor, C-Wing, Bhubaneswar Fortune Tower, Bhubaneswar-751023 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaacy 2872 M (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri Suni Mishra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S.M.Keshkamat, CITDR
Section 153Section 153ASection 271F

271(l)(c) is initiated. Issued demand notice and a copy of the order.” 5. Accordingly, the AO framed the assessment u/s.143(3)/153A/144 of the Act assessing the total income of the assessee at Rs.6,140/- for the assessment year 2008-2009 vide order dated 29.12.2010. Thereafter the AO levied penalty u/s. 271F of the Act vide order dated

YAZDANI INTERNATIONAL (P) LTD,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1(2), BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the all the assessees are dismissed

ITA 16/CTK/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack14 Oct 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.29 & 30/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Md. Mofazzalur Rahman, Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Serajuddin Square(Near Masjid) Bhubaneswar At/Po: Keonjhar-758001 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Abypr 0862 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.575 & 576/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) F.Serajuddin Exports (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aabcf 1469 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.577 &578/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Serajuddin & Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaics 3545 F & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.15/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2009-2010) Aliza International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Hig-19, Bda Housing Board Bhubaneswar Colony, Jaydev Vihar, Bhubaneswar-751013 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aafca 9579 A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.16 & 17/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Yazdani International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), 7Th Floor, C-Wing, Bhubaneswar Fortune Tower, Bhubaneswar-751023 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaacy 2872 M (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri Suni Mishra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S.M.Keshkamat, CITDR
Section 153Section 153ASection 271F

271(l)(c) is initiated. Issued demand notice and a copy of the order.” 5. Accordingly, the AO framed the assessment u/s.143(3)/153A/144 of the Act assessing the total income of the assessee at Rs.6,140/- for the assessment year 2008-2009 vide order dated 29.12.2010. Thereafter the AO levied penalty u/s. 271F of the Act vide order dated

MD. MOFAZZALUR RAHAMAN,KEONJHAR vs. ACIT, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the all the assessees are dismissed

ITA 29/CTK/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack14 Oct 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.29 & 30/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Md. Mofazzalur Rahman, Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Serajuddin Square(Near Masjid) Bhubaneswar At/Po: Keonjhar-758001 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Abypr 0862 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.575 & 576/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) F.Serajuddin Exports (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aabcf 1469 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.577 &578/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Serajuddin & Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaics 3545 F & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.15/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2009-2010) Aliza International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Hig-19, Bda Housing Board Bhubaneswar Colony, Jaydev Vihar, Bhubaneswar-751013 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aafca 9579 A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.16 & 17/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Yazdani International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), 7Th Floor, C-Wing, Bhubaneswar Fortune Tower, Bhubaneswar-751023 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaacy 2872 M (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri Suni Mishra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S.M.Keshkamat, CITDR
Section 153Section 153ASection 271F

271(l)(c) is initiated. Issued demand notice and a copy of the order.” 5. Accordingly, the AO framed the assessment u/s.143(3)/153A/144 of the Act assessing the total income of the assessee at Rs.6,140/- for the assessment year 2008-2009 vide order dated 29.12.2010. Thereafter the AO levied penalty u/s. 271F of the Act vide order dated

F SERAJUDDIN EXPORTS (P) LTD,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the all the assessees are dismissed

ITA 576/CTK/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack14 Oct 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.29 & 30/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Md. Mofazzalur Rahman, Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Serajuddin Square(Near Masjid) Bhubaneswar At/Po: Keonjhar-758001 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Abypr 0862 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.575 & 576/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) F.Serajuddin Exports (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aabcf 1469 J & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.577 &578/Ctk/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Serajuddin & Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Fortune Tower, 7Th Floor, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751007 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaics 3545 F & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.15/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2009-2010) Aliza International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), Hig-19, Bda Housing Board Bhubaneswar Colony, Jaydev Vihar, Bhubaneswar-751013 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aafca 9579 A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.16 & 17/Ctk/2014 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2008-2009 & 2009-2010) Yazdani International (P) Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle-1(2), 7Th Floor, C-Wing, Bhubaneswar Fortune Tower, Bhubaneswar-751023 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaacy 2872 M (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri Suni Mishra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S.M.Keshkamat, CITDR
Section 153Section 153ASection 271F

271(l)(c) is initiated. Issued demand notice and a copy of the order.” 5. Accordingly, the AO framed the assessment u/s.143(3)/153A/144 of the Act assessing the total income of the assessee at Rs.6,140/- for the assessment year 2008-2009 vide order dated 29.12.2010. Thereafter the AO levied penalty u/s. 271F of the Act vide order dated

M/S. VINAYAK AGRO INDUSTRIES,ROURKELA vs. ITO WARD-4, ROURKELA

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 166/CTK/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack22 Nov 2023AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri N.K.Rout, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 148

U/s 143(3)/Sec.147/Sec.263 of the Act determining total income of Rs.11,26,350/- on the basis of incomparable turnover of the giant companies in a perfunctory and ad hoc manner. The Ld. AO also initiated penalty proceeding under Section 271 (1 )(c) of the Act. 1.11. The Assessment Order dated 30-12-2019 passed by Ld .ITO was carried

M/S. VINAYAK AGRO INDUSTRIES,ROURKELA vs. ITO WARD-4, ROURKELA

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 107/CTK/2023[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack22 Nov 2023AY 2009-10
For Appellant: Shri N.K.Rout, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 148

U/s 143(3)/Sec.147/Sec.263 of the Act determining total income of Rs.11,26,350/- on the basis of incomparable turnover of the giant companies in a perfunctory and ad hoc manner. The Ld. AO also initiated penalty proceeding under Section 271 (1 )(c) of the Act. 1.11. The Assessment Order dated 30-12-2019 passed by Ld .ITO was carried

KOTHAKOTA RAMA RAO,RAYAGADA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee i

ITA 386/CTK/2018[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack28 Aug 2020AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अऩीऱ (तऱाशियाां और अशिग्रहण)सं./Ita No.132/Ctk/2018 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2013-2014) Kothakota Rama Rao, Vs. Acit, Central Circle-1, Kothapeta, Rayagada, Bhubaneswar District-Rayagada Pan No. : Aeppk 1600 P & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.19&20/Ctk/2019 & Ita No.386/Ctk/2018 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-15, 2015-16 & 2016-17) Kothakota Rama Rao, Vs. Acit, Central Circle-1, Kothapeta, Rayagada, Bhubaneswar District-Rayagada Pan No. : Aeppk 1600 P (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri P.K.Mishra, Advocate राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri M.K.Gautam, Citdr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 15/07/2020 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 31/08/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per L.P.Sahu, Am: These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Of Cit(A)-2, Bhubaneswar, Dated 11.09.2018 & 29.08.2018 For Assessment Years 2013-2014, 2014-2015, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017. 2. Since, Similar Issues Have Been Raised In All The Appeals, Therefore, For The Sake Of Convenience & Brevity, We Shall Decide The Appeal Of The Assessee For A.Y.2013-2014 In It(Ss)A No.132/Ctk/2018 After Taking Into Consideration The Grounds & Facts Mentioned

For Appellant: Shri P.K.Mishra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri M.K.Gautam, CITDR
Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153DSection 234

148 of the Act, the words used are 'shall serve on the assessee'. Similarly, in the provisions of section 149 of the Act, the words used are 'issue to the assessee. Thus, each word used in 27 IT(SS)A No.132/CTK/2018 ITA Nos.19&20/CTK/2019 each section has a different purpose and different meaning. 'Made' cannot be treated on the same

KOTHAKOTA RAMA RAO,RAYAGADA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee i

ITA 19/CTK/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack28 Aug 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अऩीऱ (तऱाशियाां और अशिग्रहण)सं./Ita No.132/Ctk/2018 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2013-2014) Kothakota Rama Rao, Vs. Acit, Central Circle-1, Kothapeta, Rayagada, Bhubaneswar District-Rayagada Pan No. : Aeppk 1600 P & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.19&20/Ctk/2019 & Ita No.386/Ctk/2018 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-15, 2015-16 & 2016-17) Kothakota Rama Rao, Vs. Acit, Central Circle-1, Kothapeta, Rayagada, Bhubaneswar District-Rayagada Pan No. : Aeppk 1600 P (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri P.K.Mishra, Advocate राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri M.K.Gautam, Citdr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 15/07/2020 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 31/08/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per L.P.Sahu, Am: These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Of Cit(A)-2, Bhubaneswar, Dated 11.09.2018 & 29.08.2018 For Assessment Years 2013-2014, 2014-2015, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017. 2. Since, Similar Issues Have Been Raised In All The Appeals, Therefore, For The Sake Of Convenience & Brevity, We Shall Decide The Appeal Of The Assessee For A.Y.2013-2014 In It(Ss)A No.132/Ctk/2018 After Taking Into Consideration The Grounds & Facts Mentioned

For Appellant: Shri P.K.Mishra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri M.K.Gautam, CITDR
Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153DSection 234

148 of the Act, the words used are 'shall serve on the assessee'. Similarly, in the provisions of section 149 of the Act, the words used are 'issue to the assessee. Thus, each word used in 27 IT(SS)A No.132/CTK/2018 ITA Nos.19&20/CTK/2019 each section has a different purpose and different meaning. 'Made' cannot be treated on the same

KOTHAKOTA RAMA RAO,RAYAGADA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee i

ITA 20/CTK/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack28 Aug 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अऩीऱ (तऱाशियाां और अशिग्रहण)सं./Ita No.132/Ctk/2018 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2013-2014) Kothakota Rama Rao, Vs. Acit, Central Circle-1, Kothapeta, Rayagada, Bhubaneswar District-Rayagada Pan No. : Aeppk 1600 P & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.19&20/Ctk/2019 & Ita No.386/Ctk/2018 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2014-15, 2015-16 & 2016-17) Kothakota Rama Rao, Vs. Acit, Central Circle-1, Kothapeta, Rayagada, Bhubaneswar District-Rayagada Pan No. : Aeppk 1600 P (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri P.K.Mishra, Advocate राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri M.K.Gautam, Citdr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 15/07/2020 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 31/08/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per L.P.Sahu, Am: These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Of Cit(A)-2, Bhubaneswar, Dated 11.09.2018 & 29.08.2018 For Assessment Years 2013-2014, 2014-2015, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017. 2. Since, Similar Issues Have Been Raised In All The Appeals, Therefore, For The Sake Of Convenience & Brevity, We Shall Decide The Appeal Of The Assessee For A.Y.2013-2014 In It(Ss)A No.132/Ctk/2018 After Taking Into Consideration The Grounds & Facts Mentioned

For Appellant: Shri P.K.Mishra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri M.K.Gautam, CITDR
Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153DSection 234

148 of the Act, the words used are 'shall serve on the assessee'. Similarly, in the provisions of section 149 of the Act, the words used are 'issue to the assessee. Thus, each word used in 27 IT(SS)A No.132/CTK/2018 ITA Nos.19&20/CTK/2019 each section has a different purpose and different meaning. 'Made' cannot be treated on the same

BIKASH DEB,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee stand allowed

ITA 388/CTK/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack17 Jan 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpiaita Nos.357 & 388/Ctk/2019 /2019 Assessment Years : 2009-10 & 2010 10 & 2010-11 Bikash Dev Bikash Dev, Flat No.101, Vs. Dcit, Circle Dcit, Circle-2(1), Haraprity Haraprity Apar Apartment, Bhubaneswar. Bhubaneswar. Vivekananda Vivekananda Marg, Marg, Old Old Town, Bhubaneswar. Town, Bhubaneswar. Pan/Gir No. Pan/Gir No.Ahepd 0737 C (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By : Shri K.K.Bal, Adv K.K.Bal, Adv Revenue By : Shri M.K.Gautam, M.K.Gautam, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 17/01 01/2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 17/01 /01/2023 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri K.K.Bal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri M.K.Gautam
Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 149Section 21(5)

penalty of Rs.243.48 crores issued by the State Government, the assessee has replied to the show cause notice issued and no further action has been done by the State Government till today. It was the further submission that the Assessing P a g e 3 | 19 ITA Nos.357 & 388/CTK/2019 Assessment Years : 2009-10 & 2010 Officer talks of unlawful mining operation