Search: penalty u/s 271

4 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 115clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)10 Section 270A8 Section 139(1)6 Section 153A6 Section 143(1)4 Section 1484 Section 21(5)2 Section 1472 Reopening of Assessment

MD. MAHATAB ALAM,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 116/CTK/2025[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack22 Jul 2025AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am

For Appellant: Shri Lalatendu Sahu, ARFor Respondent: Shri Ashim Kumar Chakraborty

Section 132Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 270ASection 271(1)(c)

271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) confirmed by the ld. CIT (A) and ITA no. 116/CTK/2025, was against the penalty levied u/s 270A of the Act as confirmed by the ld. CIT (A). It was the submission that the assessee is a dealer in fish. It was submitted that a search was conducted u/s

MD. MAHATAB ALAM,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, BHUBANESWAR

MD. MAHATAB ALAM,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, BHUBANESWAR

MD. MAHATAB ALAM,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, BHUBANESWAR

BIKASH DEB,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1), BHUBANESWAR

BIKASH DEB,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT CIRCLE- 2(1), BHUBANESWAR