BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ House Propertyclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi283Mumbai281Jaipur145Bangalore92Ahmedabad70Chennai60Hyderabad51Chandigarh46Pune40Raipur35Kolkata29Indore29Lucknow17Surat16Nagpur12Visakhapatnam9Rajkot9Guwahati7Amritsar7Agra7Cuttack4Patna4Cochin3Allahabad3Dehradun2Ranchi2

Key Topics

Section 269S8Section 271D4Penalty4Addition to Income4Section 1322Section 271(1)(c)2Search & Seizure2

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. HOTEL SUKHAMAYA PVT. LTD, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the three appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 205/CTK/2022[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Sept 2024AY 2009-10
Section 132Section 269SSection 271D

house property, business and profession and other sources and balance sheet was filed along with supportive financial statement. The Id AR's contention that the assessee was holding the cash for the business operations at Jaipur and there is no malafide intension and the said transaction was disclosed in the income tax return. Further the Id. AR emphasized that

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. HOTEL SUKHAMAYA PVT. LTD, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the three appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 206/CTK/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack
18 Sept 2024
AY 2012-13
Section 132Section 269SSection 271D

house property, business and profession and other sources and balance sheet was filed along with supportive financial statement. The Id AR's contention that the assessee was holding the cash for the business operations at Jaipur and there is no malafide intension and the said transaction was disclosed in the income tax return. Further the Id. AR emphasized that

PRAFULLA KUMAR BIDHARA,BHUBANESWAR vs. ITO, WARD 5(1), BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, ITA No.763/CTK/2025 is partly allowed whereas ITA

ITA 764/CTK/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack16 Mar 2026AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumarita No.763&764/Ctk/2025 Assessment Year: 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri S. K. Sarangi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Shakeer Ahamed, Sr. DR
Section 271(1)(c)

House No.MIG-11, Kannan Vihar, Colony, Phase-2, Near Vs KIIT Square Patia, Bhubaneswar, Odisha- 751024. (PAN: AALPB3104H) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri S. K. Sarangi, AR Revenue by : Shri Shakeer Ahamed, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 16.03.2026 Date of Pronouncement : 16.03.2026 ORDER PER BENCH: ITA No.763/CTK/2025 filed by the assessee against the order of the NFAC, Delhi [hereinafter referred

PRAFULLA KUMAR BIDHARA,BHUBANESWAR vs. ITO, WARD 5(1), BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, ITA No.763/CTK/2025 is partly allowed whereas ITA

ITA 763/CTK/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack16 Mar 2026AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumarita No.763&764/Ctk/2025 Assessment Year: 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri S. K. Sarangi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Shakeer Ahamed, Sr. DR
Section 271(1)(c)

House No.MIG-11, Kannan Vihar, Colony, Phase-2, Near Vs KIIT Square Patia, Bhubaneswar, Odisha- 751024. (PAN: AALPB3104H) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri S. K. Sarangi, AR Revenue by : Shri Shakeer Ahamed, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 16.03.2026 Date of Pronouncement : 16.03.2026 ORDER PER BENCH: ITA No.763/CTK/2025 filed by the assessee against the order of the NFAC, Delhi [hereinafter referred