PARADIP PORT AUTHORITY,JAGATSINGHPUR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE1(1), CUTTACK

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed

property held under trust wholly for charitable purposes of 10 ITA Nos.208-210/CTK/2024 religious purposes shall not be included in the total income to the extent to which it is applied for such purposes in India and where it is accumulated for such application to the extent whichever is higher. The exemption of accumulated income to the extent

PARADIP PORT AUTHORITY,JAGATSINGHPUR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-1(1), CUTTACK

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed

property held under trust wholly for charitable purposes of 10 ITA Nos.208-210/CTK/2024 religious purposes shall not be included in the total income to the extent to which it is applied for such purposes in India and where it is accumulated for such application to the extent whichever is higher. The exemption of accumulated income to the extent

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. HOTEL SUKHAMAYA PVT. LTD, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the three appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

90 per cent of the bottles covered by it were returned. The price of the bottles received by the assessee was entered by it in its general trading account while the additional sum was entered in the general ledger under the heading "Empty bottles return security deposit account" The question was whether the assessee could be assessed

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. HOTEL SUKHAMAYA PVT. LTD, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the three appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

90 per cent of the bottles covered by it were returned. The price of the bottles received by the assessee was entered by it in its general trading account while the additional sum was entered in the general ledger under the heading "Empty bottles return security deposit account" The question was whether the assessee could be assessed

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR, SAMBALPUR vs. M/S. SHREE BALAJI ENGICONS PVT. LTD., JHARSUGUDA

In the result, appeals of the assesee in IT(SS)A No

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Manish Agarwalit(Ss)A No.77/Ctk/2023

90,98,410/-. In first appeal, the ld. CIT(A) allowed part relief to the assesee against which assesee and revenue are in appeal before us. 5. During the course of hearing, the assesee has withdrawn the ground No.1. Thus, the same is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. Ground No.2 is relating to the claim of deduction u/s.80IA

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR, SAMBALPUR vs. M/S. SHREE BALAJI ENGICONS PVT. LTD., JHARSUGUDA

In the result, appeals of the assesee in IT(SS)A No

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Manish Agarwalit(Ss)A No.77/Ctk/2023

90,98,410/-. In first appeal, the ld. CIT(A) allowed part relief to the assesee against which assesee and revenue are in appeal before us. 5. During the course of hearing, the assesee has withdrawn the ground No.1. Thus, the same is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. Ground No.2 is relating to the claim of deduction u/s.80IA

M/S. SHREE BAALAJI ENGICONS LIMITED,JHARSUGUDA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), SAMBALPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesee in IT(SS)A No

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Manish Agarwalit(Ss)A No.77/Ctk/2023

90,98,410/-. In first appeal, the ld. CIT(A) allowed part relief to the assesee against which assesee and revenue are in appeal before us. 5. During the course of hearing, the assesee has withdrawn the ground No.1. Thus, the same is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. Ground No.2 is relating to the claim of deduction u/s.80IA

ASST. CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, SAMBALPUR vs. SHREE BALAJI ENGICON LIMITED, BELPAHAR RS

In the result, appeals of the assesee in IT(SS)A No

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Manish Agarwalit(Ss)A No.77/Ctk/2023

90,98,410/-. In first appeal, the ld. CIT(A) allowed part relief to the assesee against which assesee and revenue are in appeal before us. 5. During the course of hearing, the assesee has withdrawn the ground No.1. Thus, the same is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. Ground No.2 is relating to the claim of deduction u/s.80IA

M/S. SHREE BALAJI ENGICONS PVT. LTD.,BELPAHAR, JHARSUGUDA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), SAMBALPUR, SAMBALPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesee in IT(SS)A No

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Manish Agarwalit(Ss)A No.77/Ctk/2023

90,98,410/-. In first appeal, the ld. CIT(A) allowed part relief to the assesee against which assesee and revenue are in appeal before us. 5. During the course of hearing, the assesee has withdrawn the ground No.1. Thus, the same is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. Ground No.2 is relating to the claim of deduction u/s.80IA

M/S. SHREE BALAJI ENGICONS PVT. LTD.,BELPAHAR, JHARSUGUDA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), SAMBALPUR, SAMBALPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesee in IT(SS)A No

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Manish Agarwalit(Ss)A No.77/Ctk/2023

90,98,410/-. In first appeal, the ld. CIT(A) allowed part relief to the assesee against which assesee and revenue are in appeal before us. 5. During the course of hearing, the assesee has withdrawn the ground No.1. Thus, the same is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. Ground No.2 is relating to the claim of deduction u/s.80IA

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR, SAMBALPUR vs. M/S. SHREE BALAJI ENGICONS PVT. LTD., JHARSUGUDA

In the result, appeals of the assesee in IT(SS)A No

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Manish Agarwalit(Ss)A No.77/Ctk/2023

90,98,410/-. In first appeal, the ld. CIT(A) allowed part relief to the assesee against which assesee and revenue are in appeal before us. 5. During the course of hearing, the assesee has withdrawn the ground No.1. Thus, the same is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. Ground No.2 is relating to the claim of deduction u/s.80IA