BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “house property”+ Section 271Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur32Bangalore23Mumbai22Karnataka21Delhi14Chennai11Agra10Visakhapatnam10Ahmedabad8Hyderabad8Surat5Pune4Cuttack3Chandigarh3Kolkata3Cochin2Amritsar2Nagpur1Indore1Dehradun1SC1Varanasi1Rajkot1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 269S13Section 271D8Penalty3Section 1322Addition to Income2Search & Seizure2

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. HOTEL SUKHAMAYA PVT. LTD, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the three appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 205/CTK/2022[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Sept 2024AY 2009-10
Section 132Section 269SSection 271D

house property, business and profession and other sources and balance sheet was filed along with supportive financial statement. The Id AR's contention that the assessee was holding the cash for the business operations at Jaipur and there is no malafide intension and the said transaction was disclosed in the income tax return. Further the Id. AR emphasized that

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. HOTEL SUKHAMAYA PVT. LTD, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the three appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 206/CTK/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack
18 Sept 2024
AY 2012-13
Section 132Section 269SSection 271D

house property, business and profession and other sources and balance sheet was filed along with supportive financial statement. The Id AR's contention that the assessee was holding the cash for the business operations at Jaipur and there is no malafide intension and the said transaction was disclosed in the income tax return. Further the Id. AR emphasized that

MAMATA PATRA,BHUBANESWAR vs. JCIT, RANGE-5, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 136/CTK/2017[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack06 Apr 2018AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Shri S.K.Agrawalla, ARFor Respondent: Shri A.Tigga, DR
Section 269SSection 271D

property, conducts agricultural operations then he is capable of having a bank account and further noted that no evidence has been brought on record regarding assets and liabilities of Dambarudhar Nayak and filing of return of income. Finally, the AO concluded that there was intention of tax evasion on the part of the assessee and levied penalty of Rs.7