SRIPRAKASH PANY,BHUBANESWAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-3(1), BHUBANESWAR
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 336/CTK/2025[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack03 Jul 2025AY 2010-11
Bench: S/Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy(Kz) & Rajesh Kumarassessment Year :2010-11
For Appellant: Shri S.K.Agarwal, CA & Sriprakash Pany, AssesseeFor Respondent: Shri Prateek Kr Mishra, Sr. DR
Section 10Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 69
property should be Zero whereas the Ld. AO estimated at Rs.2,40,000/- . Therefore, the additions of Rs.1,29,797/- made under the head should be deleted.
5. That, the Ld. AO erred in facts I n rejecting the books of account without any plausible justification and the Ld. CIT(A) is wrong in confirming the action
