BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “house property”+ Section 144Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai24Delhi22Patna19Bangalore13Indore12Jaipur11Kolkata11Hyderabad10Lucknow9Pune8Raipur7Chennai7Ahmedabad6Cuttack5Surat4Chandigarh2Amritsar2Visakhapatnam2Nagpur2Rajkot2Cochin1SC1Orissa1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 26319Section 26012Section 119Section 12A6Limitation/Time-bar4Revision u/s 2634Section 11(1)(a)3Charitable Trust3Exemption3

SMT RENUBALA PANDA,BHUBANESWAR vs. ITO, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 77/CTK/2005[2001-2002]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Mar 2020AY 2001-2002

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.77/Ctk/2005 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2001-2002) Smt. Renubala Panda, Vs. Ito, Ward-1(1), Prop. M/S Jageswari Traders, Bhubaneswar Plot No.1656, Sastri Nagar, Bhubaneswar स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aaspp 6362 Q (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Aditya Rath, Advocate िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Subhendu Dutta, Dr

For Appellant: Shri Aditya Rath, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR
Section 143(1)Section 144ASection 2

house property and filed her return of income on 29.01.2001 showing total income at Rs.97,670/-, which was processed u/s.143(1) of the Act. Upon selection of the case of assessee for scrutiny under CASS, statutory notices were issued to the assessee. Finally, the AO completed the assessment determining total income of 2 the assessee at Rs.22,32,230/- making

Deduction3
Section 143(3)2
Addition to Income2

PARADIP PORT AUTHORITY,JAGATSINGHPUR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-1(1), CUTTACK

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 208/CTK/2024[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack25 Sept 2024AY 2003-04
Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 12ASection 260Section 263

property held under trust wholly for charitable purposes of 10 ITA Nos.208-210/CTK/2024 religious purposes shall not be included in the total income to the extent to which it is applied for such purposes in India and where it is accumulated for such application to the extent whichever is higher. The exemption of accumulated income to the extent

PARADIP PORT AUTHORITY,JAGATSINGHPUR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE1(1), CUTTACK

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 210/CTK/2024[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack25 Sept 2024AY 2005-06
Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 12ASection 260Section 263

property held under trust wholly for charitable purposes of 10 ITA Nos.208-210/CTK/2024 religious purposes shall not be included in the total income to the extent to which it is applied for such purposes in India and where it is accumulated for such application to the extent whichever is higher. The exemption of accumulated income to the extent

PARADIP PORT AUTHORITY,JAGATSINGHPUR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-1(1), CUTTACK

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 209/CTK/2024[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack25 Sept 2024AY 2004-05
Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 12ASection 260Section 263

property held under trust wholly for charitable purposes of 10 ITA Nos.208-210/CTK/2024 religious purposes shall not be included in the total income to the extent to which it is applied for such purposes in India and where it is accumulated for such application to the extent whichever is higher. The exemption of accumulated income to the extent

SANGRAM KESHARI SAMANTARAY,BHUBANESWAR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, BHUBANESWAR

ITA 12/CTK/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack28 Oct 2021AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri D.Parida/C.Parida, ARFor Respondent: Shri M.K.Gautam, CITDR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 263

Housing Projects ltd. (2012) 343 ITR 329; vi) Aditi Aggarwal Vs. Pr.CIT, ITA No.21/Chd/2021, order dated 20.09.2021; vii) Sh. Jaswinder Singh Vs. CIT-II, ITA No.690/Chd/2010, order dated 09.03.2012; viii) Shri Sunil Chhagan Bhaybhang Vs. Pr.CIT, ITA No.932/PUN/2016, order dated 07.03.2019; and ix) Raghunath Exporters Vs. Pr.CIT, ITA No.92/Kol/2017, order dated 10.11.2017. 10. It was also submitted