TUFF TUBES (ORISSA) (P) LTD.,JANKIA, KHORDHA vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(2), BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 543/CTK/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack09 Apr 2025AY 2015-16
Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumarassessment Year: 2015-16
For Appellant: Shri S. K. Sarangi, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, CIT, DR
Section 250Section 40A(3)Section 69A
928/-. It was the submission that the Assessing Officer treated the difference of Rs.4,48,09,634/- as the suppressed turnover of the assessee. The Ld. AR drew our attention to pages 96 to 104 of the paper book which is the audit report done by the Central Excise & Service Tax
Department in the case of the assessee which reads
