BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 43Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai65Karnataka51Ahmedabad38Delhi27Chennai16Telangana15Bangalore13Hyderabad9Kolkata9Jaipur7Pune5Cochin4SC3Surat3Lucknow2Cuttack2Visakhapatnam2Raipur1Rajkot1Jodhpur1Chandigarh1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 44A5Section 323Section 282Section 43C2Section 112Disallowance2Addition to Income2

ADHIKAR,BHUBANESWAR vs. ITO, WARD-2(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 255/CTK/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack27 Sept 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year : 2012-2013

For Appellant: Shri S.C.Bhadra, ARFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Datta, DR
Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 28Section 29Section 30Section 32Section 32(1)Section 34Section 43C

43C. That, section 32(1) of the Act provides for depreciation in respect of building, plant and machinery owned by the assessee and used for business purposes. It further provides for deduction subject to section 34. In that matter also, a similar argument, as in the present case, was advanced on behalf of the Revenue, namely, that depreciation

NIRANJAN JATA,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT,SALARY CIRCLE-3(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 185/CTK/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack31 Dec 2019AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Gargassessment Year : 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri P.R.Mohanty, ARFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR
Section 28Section 43CSection 44ASection 71

disallowance of set off of business loss U/s 71 is unjustified and unwarranted and devoid of any merit, being legitimate set off allowed by statute, deserves to be allowed in Toto.” 3. The facts in brief are that the assessee is a salaried employee in Oil India Limited. During the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer noticed that