Search: disallowance

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 271Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai50 Delhi41 Chennai36 Bangalore32 Jaipur23 Kolkata19 Indore19 Hyderabad14 Ahmedabad13 Agra10 Pune8 Panaji6 Surat6 Cochin5 Cuttack4 Visakhapatnam3 Raipur2 Chandigarh2 Jabalpur1 Lucknow1 Rajkot1 SC1 Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 271D19 Section 269S14 Penalty3 Section 402

KISHAN MOTORS,BHUBANESWAR vs. ITO, WARD-4(3), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal in ITA No

ITA 169/CTK/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack24 Jan 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri S.K.Agarwal, ARFor Respondent: Shri J.K.Lenka, DR

Section 143(3)Section 40Section 43B

disallowance has been made on the basis of suspicion alone and no basis has been given by the AO. Hence, we direct P a g e 8 | 14 ITA Nos.169 & 37 1/C TK /2 018 Assessm ent Y ear : 20 14- 201 5 the AO to delete the addition made on adhoc basis. Ground No.5 of appeal is allowed

M/S. SHREE SAI ENTERPRISES,BHUBANESWAR vs. ADDL. CIT, RANGE-4, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

KISHAN MOTORS,BHUBANESWAR vs. ITO, WARD-4(3), BHUBANESWAR

M/S. SHREE SAI ENTERPRISES,BHUBANESWAR vs. ADDL. CIT, RANGE-4, BHUBANESWAR

KISHAN MOTORS,BHUBANESWAR vs. ITO, WARD-4(3), BHUBANESWAR

M/S. SHREE SAI ENTERPRISES,BHUBANESWAR vs. ADDL. CIT, RANGE-4, BHUBANESWAR

JCIT, CUTTACK vs. M/S. DUSHASHAN JENA, CUTTACK

ACIT, CUTTACK vs. M/S. DUSHASAN JENA, CUTTACK