DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), CUTTACK vs. SRI DIPENDRA BAHADUR SINGH, KEONJHAR
In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed
ITA 265/CTK/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack06 Apr 2022AY 2015-16
Bench: S/ S/Shri Chandra Mohan Garg, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpiaassessment Year : 2013-14 Dcit, Circle-1(1), 1(1), Vs. Sri Dipendra Bahadur Singh, Sri Dipendra Bahadur Singh, Cuttack Hudisahi, Joda, Keonjhar Hudisahi, Joda, Keonjhar Pan/Gir No. No.Adjps 5869 D (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By : Shri S.K.Agarwal S.K.Agarwalla, Ar Revenue By : Shri M.K.Goutam, M.K.Goutam, Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 30/3/ 20 / 2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 6 /4 4/2022 O R D E R Per C.M.Garg G, Jm
For Appellant: Shri S.K.AgarwalFor Respondent: Shri M.K.Goutam
Section 1Section 194ASection 194A(3)(iii)Section 201Section 263Section 40
section 40(a)(ia) of the Act, therefore, entire claim of interest of Rs.67,62,544/- was disallowed by the AO.
P a g e 2 | 9
Assessment Year : 2013-14
6. On appeal, the CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal of the assessee by observing as under:
“During the course of the appellate proceedings, the counsel for the assesee
