BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “disallowance”+ Rectification u/s 154clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai887Delhi733Bangalore374Kolkata247Ahmedabad176Chennai172Indore150Pune130Jaipur125Hyderabad115Chandigarh87Cochin80Lucknow77Agra73Visakhapatnam58Surat42Raipur36Nagpur29Guwahati26Jodhpur25Rajkot24Amritsar22Patna21Jabalpur11Panaji10Cuttack8Allahabad8Karnataka6Dehradun3SC2Telangana2Varanasi2Punjab & Haryana2Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 15429Section 11(2)16Section 143(1)(a)11Section 143(1)8Section 407Rectification u/s 1547Section 2506Section 106Deduction6Section 271(1)(b)

NESCO EMPLOYEES GRATUITY FUND TRUST,BALASORE vs. ITO, WARD-1, BALASORE, BALASORE

ITA 159/CTK/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack16 Jul 2025AY 2016-17
For Appellant: Shri Nihar Ranjan Biswal, ARFor Respondent: Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr.DR
Section 10Section 10(24)Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 154Section 250

disallowance of exemption claimed in the return of income. Against this Intimation u/s 143(1), the assessee submitted an application for rectification u/s 154

5
Disallowance5
Exemption4

GRAM VIKAS TRUST,BERHAMPUR vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD, BERAMPUR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee for AYs 2014-

ITA 436/CTK/2024[AY 2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack12 Jun 2025

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy(Kz) & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 11(2)Section 119(2)(b)Section 143(1)(a)Section 154Section 234BSection 250

disallowing the claim u/s 11(2) of the Act and raising a demand of ₹ 1,70,630/-. The assessee thereafter, uploaded Form No. 10 and filed a petition u/s 154 of the Act for rectification

GRAM VIKAS TRUST,BERHAMPUR vs. ITO,EXEMPTION WARD, BERAMPUR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee for AYs 2014-

ITA 437/CTK/2024[AY 2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack12 Jun 2025

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy(Kz) & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 11(2)Section 119(2)(b)Section 143(1)(a)Section 154Section 234BSection 250

disallowing the claim u/s 11(2) of the Act and raising a demand of ₹ 1,70,630/-. The assessee thereafter, uploaded Form No. 10 and filed a petition u/s 154 of the Act for rectification

PRAFULLA KUMAR ROUTRAY,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 175/CTK/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack25 Jul 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 154Section 250Section 271(1)(b)Section 272A(1)(d)Section 54Section 69A

disallowed the cost of I.T.A. No.: 175/CTK/2025 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Prafulla Kumar Routray. acquisition of the property at ₹1,57,53,865/- and claim of deduction of ₹82,46,135/- u/s 54 of the Act totalling to ₹2,40,00,000/- and added the same to the returned income of the assessee. Aggrieved with the assessment order, the assessee

M/S. GRID CORPORATION OF ORISSA LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT-(TDS), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 323/CTK/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack20 Feb 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpiaassessment Year : 2009-2010 2010 Grid Corporation Of Orissa Grid Corporation Of Orissa Vs. Acit (Tds), Acit (Tds), Ltd., Ltd., Gridco Gridco House, House, Bhubaneswar. Bhubaneswar. Janapath, Bhubaneswar. Janapath, Bhubaneswar. Pan/Gir No. Pan/Gir No.Aabcg 5398 P (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By : S/Shri Ved Jain/P.Venugopal Rao /P.Venugopal Rao, Ars Revenue By : Shri M.K.Gautam, M.K.Gautam, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 20/0 02/2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 20/0 /02/2023 O R D E R Per Bench This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, 1, Bhubaneswar, Dated 12.7.2019 In Appeal No. In Appeal No.0035/17-18 For The Assessment Year The Assessment Year 2009-2010. 2. S/Shri Ved Jain & P.Venugopal Rao, S/Shri Ved Jain & P.Venugopal Rao, Ld Ar Ld Ars Appeared For The Assessee & Shri M.K.Gautam, Ld Cit Dr Appeared For The Revenue. Assessee & Shri M.K.Gautam, Ld Cit Dr Appeared For The Revenue. Assessee & Shri M.K.Gautam, Ld Cit Dr Appeared For The Revenue.

For Appellant: S/Shri Ved Jain/P.Venugopal RaoFor Respondent: Shri M.K.Gautam
Section 154Section 244ASection 244A(2)

u/s. 154 could not be faulted with. When the A.O. has ignored or overlooked mandatory provisions of law, it will constitute a mistake apparent from the record. vi.) The Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Steel Strips Ltd. (11 taxmann.com 361) has held that overlooking of statutory provision is clearly a mistake apparent

SUKANTI EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST,SONEPUR vs. ITO,EXEMPTION WARD, SAMBALPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 51/CTK/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack12 Jun 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy(Kz) & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 10Section 12ASection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 250Section 57

disallowance of Rs. 2,52,02,720/- u/s 57 regarding treating the gross receipts as the income of the appellant, as per the remand report received from the AO, which is reproduced in the body of the order, it has been again mentioned that the appellant did not furnish any details of the expenses and no audit report was furnished

BISWAJIT NAYAK,RAJGANGPUR vs. ITO WARD-2,, ROURKELA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 17/CTK/2022[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Cuttack24 Nov 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpiaassessment Year : 2018-19 Biswajit Biswajit Nayak, Nayak, C/O. C/O. Vs. Ito, Ward Ito, Ward-2, Rourkela Biswajit Nayak, Banthupara Biswajit Nayak, Banthupara Rajgangpur, Rajgangpur, Sundargarh Sundargarh- 770017 Pan/Gir No. Pan/Gir No.Abwpn 2210 J (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By Assessee By : S/Shri S.K.Agarwalla, Ca & S.K.Hota & S.K.Hota, Ar Revenue By : Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr S.C.Mohanty, Sr Dr Date Of Hearing : 25/11 11/2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 25/11 11/2022 O R D E R Per Bench This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Against The Order Of The Ld Cit(A)-Nfac, Nfac, Delhi Delhi Dated 23.12.2021 23.12.2021 In Appeal No.Itba/Nfac/S/.250/2021 Itba/Nfac/S/.250/2021-22/1038053683(1) For The Assessment Year For The Assessment Year 2018-19. 2. S/Shri S.K.Agarwalla S.K.Agarwalla, Ca & S.K.Hota, Ar Appeared On Behalf Of The Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee & Shri S.C.Mohanty, Ld Sr Dr Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee & Shri S.C.Mohanty, Ld Sr Dr Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee & Shri S.C.Mohanty, Ld Sr Dr Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue.

For Appellant: S/Shri S.K.Agarwalla, CA and S.K.Hota and S.K.Hota, ARFor Respondent: Shri S.C.Mohanty, SR
Section 143(1)Section 154Section 36(1)(va)Section 37(1)Section 43B

rectification order u/s. 154 of the Act was passed on 30.6.2019, wherein, the employees contribution to PF & ESI paid beyond the due date under the P.F.Act but before the due date of filing of the return had been disallowed

REGIONAL COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT,BHUBANESWAR vs. ITO, WARD-2(2), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 94/CTK/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Aug 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.94/Ctk/2016 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2008-2009 Regional College Of Engineering & Vs. Ito Ward-2(2), Bhubaneswar Management, Plot No.18, Sector-A, Zone-B, Mancheswar Industrial Estate, Bhubaneswar-751010 Pan No. : Aaaar 1386 H (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Sunil Mishra, Advocate राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Subhendu Datta, Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 20/08/2020 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 21/08/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per L.P.Sahu, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Cit(A)-3, Bhubaneswar, Dated 28.12.2015 For The Assessment Year 2008-2009, On The Following Grounds Of Appeal :- 1. That, The Learned Cit (A) Has Committed Serious Error In Not Allowing The Appeal Of The Appellant Against The Order Of The Learned Ao Passed U/S 154 Of The Income Tax Act Dated 15.10.2014 . 2. That, The Learned Cit (A) Has Committed Serious Error In Not Accepting That The Denial Of "Emption To A Charitable Trust Granted Registration U/S 12Aa Of The Income Tax Act Is A Mistake Apparent From Record As Envisaged U/S 154 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. 3. That, The Learned Cit (A) Has Committed Serious Error In Holding That The Mistake Of Disallowance For Violation Of Provision Of Section 40(A)(Ia) Of The Income Tax Act Is Not A Mistake Apparent From Record In The Case Of A Charitable Trust Registered U/S 12Aa Of The Income Tax Act.

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Mishra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Datta, DR
Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 154Section 28Section 40

154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 3. That, the learned CIT (A) has committed serious error in holding that the mistake of disallowance for violation of provision of Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act is not a mistake apparent from record in the case of a charitable Trust registered u/s 12AA of the Income