BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “depreciation”+ Section 35Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai16Ranchi13Jaipur12Chennai10Hyderabad10Bangalore9Kolkata5Ahmedabad4Delhi3Cuttack3Cochin2Pune1SC1

Key Topics

Section 35E4Disallowance3Section 143(3)2Section 14A2Section 372Depreciation2Addition to Income2

MAHANADI COALFIELDS LTD.,SAMBALPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1), SAMBALPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for

ITA 174/CTK/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack05 Jun 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.174/Ctk/2018 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2015 - 2016) Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd., Vs. Dcit, Circle-2(1), Sambalpur Jagriti Vihar, Burla, Sambalpur स्थायी ऱेखा सं./Pan No. : Aabcm 5188 P (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. यनधागररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri S.S.Podar, Ca राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri S.M.Keshkamat, Citdr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 15/01/2020 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 05/06/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per L.P.Sahu, Am :

For Appellant: Shri S.S.Podar, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.M.Keshkamat, CITDR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32Section 35ESection 37Section 37(1)

Depreciation on Leasehold Land U/s. 32 (1) (ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as an Intangible Assets - Rs. 27491.00 Lacs. Additional Grounds/ Alternate claim 3.1.1. The authorities below have erred in not allowing the alternate claim of expenditure u/s. 37(1) of the Income tax Act, 1961 on the basis of actual expenditure incurred ; or 3.1.2. The authorities below

ACIT, SAMBALPUR vs. M/S MAHANADI COALFIELDS LTD, SAMBALPUR

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue for the assessment years

ITA 397/CTK/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack20 Mar 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri S.S.Poddar/N.Kedia, ARFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Kolhe, CIT DR
Section 143(3)

depreciation by reducing the value of block of assets by sale value. This ground of appeal of the assessee for A.Y. 2011-12 is allowed for statistical purposes. 32 Mah anadi Coalf ield Ltyd., 74. Ground No3(5) of appeal is against addition u/s.14A for assessment year 2014-15 is not pressed due to smallness of amount and hence, same

DCIT, SAMBALPUR vs. M/S. EAST INDIA MINERALS LTD., KEONJHAR

In the result, the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 31/CTK/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack27 Jun 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: NONEFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Pradhan, DR
Section 147Section 32(1)Section 32(1)(ii)Section 35E

section referred to and hence, cannot be accepted and disallowed deduction for Rs.20,12,041/-. 10. On appeal, the CIT(A) observed that 35E allows deduction of the nature of amortizations @ 1/10th of the total of prescribed expenses incurred by an Indian resident engaged in any operations relating to prospecting, for, or extraction or production of, any mineral, wholly