CHHABINDRA BEHERA,ANGUL vs. ITO, ANGUL WARD, ANGUL
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 289/CTK/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack17 May 2018AY 2009-10
Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm Chhabindra Behera, Vs. Ito, Angul At-Badatribida, Ghantapada, Kaniha, Talcher, Dist-Angul, स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Ajcpb 4058 L (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri K.K.Bal, Ar िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri D.K.Pradhan, Dr सुनवाई की तािीख / Date Of Hearing : 17/05/2018 घोषणा की तािीख/Date Of Pronouncement 17/05/2018 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: The Assessee Has Filed This Appeal Against The Order Of Cit(A)-2, Bhubaneswar, Dated 10.02.2017, Passed In I.T.Appeal No.0025/2015-16, U/S.263/143(3)/250 Of The I.T.Act For The Assessment Year 2014-2015. 2. As Per The Office Note, There Is A Delay Of 36 Days In Filing The Present Appeal. The Assessee Has Filed An Application Dated 28.07.2017 For Condonation Of Delay Along With An Affidavit Explaining The Reasons For Delay. Considering The Application Of Assessee & Looking To The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & Ld. Dr Has No Serious Objection, We Allow The Application & Condone The Delay Of 36 Days In Filing The Present Appeal & The Appeal Is Heard Finally. 3. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :- “1. For That The Order Of The Forum Below Is Arbitrary, Unjust In & Illegal In The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & Liable To Be Quashed.
For Appellant: Shri K.K.Bal, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Pradhan, DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 263Section 69Section 69C
condone the delay of 36 days in filing the present appeal and the appeal is heard finally.
3. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal :-
“1. For that the order of the forum below is arbitrary, unjust in and illegal in the facts and circumstances of the case and liable to be quashed.
2
2. For that
