Search: condonation of delay

7 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 46Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Addition to Income6 Section 2505 Section 114 Limitation/Time-bar4 Section 143(3)3 Section 683 Section 1443 Condonation of Delay3 Section 249(2)

MR. NARENDRA KUMA RBAL,KEONJHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, KEONJHAR WARD, KEONJHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 178/CTK/2025[2011-12]Status: HeardITAT Cuttack28 May 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 250

condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication. 2. The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal raising the following grounds of appeal: “A. For that, the order of the forums below are illegal absurd, improper and excessive in the facts and circumstances of the case, hence the orders passed are liable to be deleted. B. For that

ACIT, CIRCLE-2(2), BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. SRB CONSULTANCY PVT. LTD., BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for

ITA 504/CTK/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack

MR. NARENDRA KUMA RBAL,KEONJHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, KEONJHAR WARD, KEONJHAR

ACIT, CIRCLE-2(2), BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. SRB CONSULTANCY PVT. LTD., BHUBANESWAR

MR. NARENDRA KUMA RBAL,KEONJHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, KEONJHAR WARD, KEONJHAR

ACIT, CIRCLE-2(2), BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. SRB CONSULTANCY PVT. LTD., BHUBANESWAR

URMILA KISHAN,ANGUL vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (APPEALS), NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE (NFAC)

DCIT (EXEMPTIONS), BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. NILAKANTHA EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST, BHUBANESWAR

SURESH KUMAR SOMANI,MALKANGIRI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BERHAMPUR, BERHAMPUR

VAIBHAV RONOKA,BHUBANESWAR vs. ITO, WARD-4(1), BHUBANESWAR

SARASWATI SISHU MANDIR,DHENKANAL vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENTDEPARTMENT, BHUBANESWAR