Search: condonation of delay

76 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 28clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 263101 Section 1042 Section 143(3)30 Limitation/Time-bar30 Addition to Income29 Disallowance24 Section 12A23 Condonation of Delay21 Charitable Trust

RAVI METALLICS LIMITED,ROURKELA vs. PR.CIT, SAMBALPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 34/CTK/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack05 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Arun Khodpiaravi Metallics Limited, I/10, Civil Township, Rourkela-769004 Pan No.Adqps 4031 G ………………Assessee Versus Pr.Cit, Sambalpur ………………..Revenue Shri P.R.Mohanty, Ar For The Assessee Shri M.K.Gautam, Cit-Dr For The Revenue Date Of Hearing : 30/05/2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 30/05/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Pr.Cit, Sambalpur, Passed U/S.263 Of The Act In Case No.Pcit/Sbp/263/26/2018-19, Dated 29.03.2019 For The Assessment Year 2014-2015. Heard On The Question Of Condonation Of Delay 2. On Perusal Of The Record, We Found That The Appeal Of The Assessee Is Barred By 686 Days. In This Regard, Ld. Ar Filed An Application Along With Affidavit For Condonation Of Delay, Wherein It Has Been Submitted That The Delay Occurred In Filing The Present Appeal Is Neither Intentional Nor Deliberate But Due To Unfortunate & Unavoidable Circumstances Beyond

Section 253Section 263

delay in filing the appeal stands condoned and the appeal is admitted for hearing. Heard on the merits of the appeal 7. Now, we shall proceed to decide the appeal of the assessee challenging the order passed u/s.263 of the Act. 8. It was submitted by the ld. AR that the Pr.CIT has invoked his powers u/s.263

Showing 1–20 of 76 · Page 1 of 4

RAVI METALLICS LIMITED,ROURKELA vs. PR.CIT, SAMBALPUR

RAVI METALLICS LIMITED,ROURKELA vs. PR.CIT, SAMBALPUR

ARSS TRIVENI JV,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-4(1), BHUBANESWAR

NIRAJ-ARSS JV,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), BHUBANESWAR

BACKBONE ARSS JV,BHUBANESWAR vs. ITO, WARD-4(3), BHUBANESWAR

PATEL-ARSS JV,BHUBANESWAR vs. ITO, WARD-4(3), BHUBANESWAR

ARSS-GVR JV,BHUBANESWAR vs. ITO, WARD-4(3), BHUBANESWAR

DCIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE- 1(2), BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. NATIONAL ALUMINIUM COMPANY LTD., BHUBANESWAR

NATIONAL ALUMINIUM COMPANY LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1(2), BHUBANESWAR

ACIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1(2), BHUBANESWAR vs. NATIONAL ALUMINIUM COMPANY LTD., BHUBANESWAR

NATIONAL ALUMINIUM COMPANY LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1(2), BHUBANESWAR

DCIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1(2), BHUBANESWAR vs. NATIONAL ALUMINIUM COMPANY LIMITED, BHUBANESWAR

NATIONAL ALUMINIUM COMPANY LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE- 1(2), BHUBANESWAR

SMT. MAMTA SHARMA,BARGARH vs. PRINCIPAL CIT (CENTRAL) , VISAKHAPATNAM

BHUBANESWAR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,BHUBANESWAR vs. CIT, BHUBANESWAR

BAITARANI GRAMYA BANK,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, BALASORE

DEOKARAN DAS RAMBILASH,SUNDARGARH vs. ITA, WARD-04, , ROURKELA

ACIT, CIRCLE-2(2), BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. SRB CONSULTANCY PVT. LTD., BHUBANESWAR

MARUTI ESTATE (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1), BHUBANESWAR

HEMANT KUMAR MAJHI,KONGARA vs. ITO, JEYPORE WARD, JEYPORE

KHIMJI & SONS,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT CIRCLE-1(1), BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR