BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

23 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 249(4)(a)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai381Chennai194Kolkata184Delhi156Bangalore143Chandigarh121Ahmedabad114Karnataka102Hyderabad82Jaipur79Raipur74Pune61Surat57Indore54Lucknow42Visakhapatnam39Amritsar29Panaji28Agra26Patna23Cuttack23Cochin15Rajkot14Nagpur14Guwahati12Jodhpur11Ranchi11Jabalpur9Allahabad8Calcutta7Dehradun6Varanasi6Telangana3Andhra Pradesh1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 14425Limitation/Time-bar18Section 249(3)10Condonation of Delay10Section 59Section 143(3)9Section 271(1)(c)8Section 272A(1)(d)8Penalty

KAMYAB TELEVISION(P) LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 536/CTK/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack31 Dec 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Before Shri George Mathanmember & Manish Agarwal Manish Agarwalita Nos.536 & 537/Ctk/2024 Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2017-18 Assessment Year 18 Kamyab Television Pvt. Ltd., Plot Kamyab Television Pvt. Ltd., Plot Vs. Dcit, Corporate Circle-1(1), Dcit, Corporate Circle No.159, Alaka Unit No.159, Alaka Unit-Ii, Ashok Bhubaneswar Nagar, Bhubaneswar Nagar, Bhubaneswar Pan/Gir No Aaecm 3608 B Aaecm 3608 B (Appellant) (Appellant .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By : Shri P.R.Mohanty, Adv , Adv Revenue By : Shri : Shri Saroj Kumar Dubey, Cit Dr & S.C.Mohanty, Sr Dr S.C.Mohanty, Sr Dr Date Of Hearing : 31/12/20 2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 31/12/20 024

For Appellant: Shri P.R.Mohanty, AdvFor Respondent: Shri
Section 144Section 249(2)Section 249(3)Section 5

4. In respect of ITA No.537/CTK/2024 for the assessment year 2017- 18, ld AR submitted that the ld CIT(A) has not condoned the delay in filing of appeal and dismissed on that count only. He submitted that notice of for submitting the reasons for condonation of delay was provided in the email address of the assessee. As the same

Showing 1–20 of 23 · Page 1 of 2

8
Section 1485
Section 1474
Reassessment2

KAMYAB TELEVISION (P) LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 537/CTK/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack31 Dec 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Before Shri George Mathanmember & Manish Agarwal Manish Agarwalita Nos.536 & 537/Ctk/2024 Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2017-18 Assessment Year 18 Kamyab Television Pvt. Ltd., Plot Kamyab Television Pvt. Ltd., Plot Vs. Dcit, Corporate Circle-1(1), Dcit, Corporate Circle No.159, Alaka Unit No.159, Alaka Unit-Ii, Ashok Bhubaneswar Nagar, Bhubaneswar Nagar, Bhubaneswar Pan/Gir No Aaecm 3608 B Aaecm 3608 B (Appellant) (Appellant .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By : Shri P.R.Mohanty, Adv , Adv Revenue By : Shri : Shri Saroj Kumar Dubey, Cit Dr & S.C.Mohanty, Sr Dr S.C.Mohanty, Sr Dr Date Of Hearing : 31/12/20 2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 31/12/20 024

For Appellant: Shri P.R.Mohanty, AdvFor Respondent: Shri
Section 144Section 249(2)Section 249(3)Section 5

4. In respect of ITA No.537/CTK/2024 for the assessment year 2017- 18, ld AR submitted that the ld CIT(A) has not condoned the delay in filing of appeal and dismissed on that count only. He submitted that notice of for submitting the reasons for condonation of delay was provided in the email address of the assessee. As the same

ASHOK BRICKS INDUSTRIES PVT LTD,BELPAHAR vs. ACIT/DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), SAMBALPUR, SAMBALPUR

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are partly allowed for\nstatistical purposes

ITA 454/CTK/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack24 Sept 2025AY 2014-15

249 days. ITA\nNo.454/CTK/2025 for A.Y.2014-2015 is delayed by 639 days & ITA\nNo.455/CTK/2025 for A.Y.2017-2018 is delayed by 639 days. In this\nregard, the assesee has filed condonation application in each of the\nabove files supported by affidavits stating sufficient reasons for delay in\nfiling the above appeals. Ld. CIT-DR/Sr. DR did not raise any serious\nPage

ORISSA STATE CO-OPERATIVE HANDICRAFTS CORPORATION LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-1(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 498/CTK/2025[2015016]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack01 Dec 2025

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumar

For Respondent: Shri Asim Chakraborty, ld CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 271(1)(c)Section 272A(1)(d)

249(3) of the Income Tax Act, provides powers to the ld Commissioner of Income Appeals to condone the delay in filing the appeal before him. It has been used in Section 5 of Indian Limitation Act, 1963 that whenever interpretation and construction before the Hon’ble High Court as well as before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, then

ORISSA STATE CO-OPERATIVE HANDICRAFTS CORPORATION LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-1(1), , BHUBANEWSWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 497/CTK/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack01 Dec 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumar

For Respondent: Shri Asim Chakraborty, ld CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 271(1)(c)Section 272A(1)(d)

249(3) of the Income Tax Act, provides powers to the ld Commissioner of Income Appeals to condone the delay in filing the appeal before him. It has been used in Section 5 of Indian Limitation Act, 1963 that whenever interpretation and construction before the Hon’ble High Court as well as before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, then

ORISSA STATE CO-OPERATIVE HANDICRAFTS CORPORATION LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-1(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 502/CTK/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack01 Dec 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumar

For Respondent: Shri Asim Chakraborty, ld CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 271(1)(c)Section 272A(1)(d)

249(3) of the Income Tax Act, provides powers to the ld Commissioner of Income Appeals to condone the delay in filing the appeal before him. It has been used in Section 5 of Indian Limitation Act, 1963 that whenever interpretation and construction before the Hon’ble High Court as well as before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, then

ORISSA STATE CO-OPERATIVE HANDICRAFTS CORPORATION LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-1(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 504/CTK/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack01 Dec 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumar

For Respondent: Shri Asim Chakraborty, ld CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 271(1)(c)Section 272A(1)(d)

249(3) of the Income Tax Act, provides powers to the ld Commissioner of Income Appeals to condone the delay in filing the appeal before him. It has been used in Section 5 of Indian Limitation Act, 1963 that whenever interpretation and construction before the Hon’ble High Court as well as before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, then

ORISSA STATE CO-OPERATIVE HANDICRAFTS CORPORATION LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-1(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 503/CTK/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack01 Dec 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumar

For Respondent: Shri Asim Chakraborty, ld CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 271(1)(c)Section 272A(1)(d)

249(3) of the Income Tax Act, provides powers to the ld Commissioner of Income Appeals to condone the delay in filing the appeal before him. It has been used in Section 5 of Indian Limitation Act, 1963 that whenever interpretation and construction before the Hon’ble High Court as well as before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, then

ORISSA STATE CO-OPERATIVE HANDICRAFTS CORPORATION LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-1(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 499/CTK/2025[2015016]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack01 Dec 2025

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumar

For Respondent: Shri Asim Chakraborty, ld CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 271(1)(c)Section 272A(1)(d)

249(3) of the Income Tax Act, provides powers to the ld Commissioner of Income Appeals to condone the delay in filing the appeal before him. It has been used in Section 5 of Indian Limitation Act, 1963 that whenever interpretation and construction before the Hon’ble High Court as well as before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, then

ORISSA STATE CO-OPERATIVE HANDICRAFTS CORPORATION LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-1(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 500/CTK/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack01 Dec 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumar

For Respondent: Shri Asim Chakraborty, ld CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 271(1)(c)Section 272A(1)(d)

249(3) of the Income Tax Act, provides powers to the ld Commissioner of Income Appeals to condone the delay in filing the appeal before him. It has been used in Section 5 of Indian Limitation Act, 1963 that whenever interpretation and construction before the Hon’ble High Court as well as before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, then

ORISSA STATE CO-OPERATIVE HANDICRAFTS CORPORATION LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-1(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 496/CTK/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack01 Dec 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumar

For Respondent: Shri Asim Chakraborty, ld CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 271(1)(c)Section 272A(1)(d)

249(3) of the Income Tax Act, provides powers to the ld Commissioner of Income Appeals to condone the delay in filing the appeal before him. It has been used in Section 5 of Indian Limitation Act, 1963 that whenever interpretation and construction before the Hon’ble High Court as well as before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, then

JM MINING AND TRADING PVT. LTD.,TULSIPUR, CUTTACK vs. A.C.I.T, CIRCLE-2(1), CUTTACK, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, SHELTER CHOWK, CUTTACK

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 37/CTK/2024[2011-12]Status: HeardITAT Cuttack23 Jul 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Before Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Manish Agarwal Manish Agarwalita Nos.36 & 37/Ctk/2024 24 Assessment Years : 2010-11 & 2011 11 & 2011-12 Jm Mining & Trading Pvt Jm Mining & Trading Pvt Vs. Acit, Circle Acit, Circle-2(1), Ltd., Ltd., At At-Madhusudan Cuttack Avenue, Tulsipur, Cuttack Avenue, Tulsipur, Cuttack Pan/Gir No Pan/Gir No.Aabcj 2946 C (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Sandeep Kumar Jena, Sandeep Kumar Jena, Adv Revenue By : Shri S.C.Mohanty : Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr Dr Date Of Hearing : 23/0 07/2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 23/0 /07/2024 O R D E R Per Bench

For Appellant: Shri Sandeep Kumar JenaFor Respondent: Shri S.C.Mohanty
Section 147Section 147oSection 148Section 249

249 of the Act and Rule 45 of the Rules, serves as undue harassments as such no scope to e-file appeal is available with the appellant under the e-filing portal. The appellant is also enclosing the copies of the screenshot of e- proceeding portal dated 20.05.2024 in its own appeals as well as in the aforesaid appeals

JM MINING AND TRADING PVT. LTD,TULSIPUR, CUTTACK vs. A.C.I.T CIRCLE2(1), CUTTACK CIRCLE, CUTTACK, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, SHELTER CHOWK

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 36/CTK/2024[2010-11]Status: HeardITAT Cuttack23 Jul 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Before Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Manish Agarwal Manish Agarwalita Nos.36 & 37/Ctk/2024 24 Assessment Years : 2010-11 & 2011 11 & 2011-12 Jm Mining & Trading Pvt Jm Mining & Trading Pvt Vs. Acit, Circle Acit, Circle-2(1), Ltd., Ltd., At At-Madhusudan Cuttack Avenue, Tulsipur, Cuttack Avenue, Tulsipur, Cuttack Pan/Gir No Pan/Gir No.Aabcj 2946 C (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Sandeep Kumar Jena, Sandeep Kumar Jena, Adv Revenue By : Shri S.C.Mohanty : Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr Dr Date Of Hearing : 23/0 07/2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 23/0 /07/2024 O R D E R Per Bench

For Appellant: Shri Sandeep Kumar JenaFor Respondent: Shri S.C.Mohanty
Section 147Section 147oSection 148Section 249

249 of the Act and Rule 45 of the Rules, serves as undue harassments as such no scope to e-file appeal is available with the appellant under the e-filing portal. The appellant is also enclosing the copies of the screenshot of e- proceeding portal dated 20.05.2024 in its own appeals as well as in the aforesaid appeals

CUTTACK CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,CUTTACK vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), CUTTACK

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 507/CTK/2025[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack02 Dec 2025AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumarआयकर अपील सं/Ita Nos.507 To 511 & 513 & 514/Ctk/2025 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2008-09,2012-13,2013-14, 2014-15,2017-18,2019-20 & 2020-2021) Cuttack Central Co.Op. Bank Ltd., , Vs Dcit, Circle-1(1), Balikuda, At/Po: Balikuda, Cuttack Jagatsinghpur Pan No. : Aaabc 0373 Q .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri N.R.Biswal, Ca : Shri Ashim Kr Chakraborty, Cit Dr & राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By Shri Vijaya Singh, Ld Sr Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 2 /12/2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 2 /12/2025

For Appellant: Shri N.R.Biswal, CA
Section 249(3)Section 5

249(3) of the Income Tax Act, provides powers to the ld Commissioner of Income Appeals to condone the delay in filing the appeal before him. It has been used in Section 5 of Indian Limitation Act, 1963 that whenever interpretation and construction before the Hon’ble High Court as well as before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, then

CUTTACK CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,CUTTACK vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), CUTTACK, CUTTACK

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 510/CTK/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack02 Dec 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumarआयकर अपील सं/Ita Nos.507 To 511 & 513 & 514/Ctk/2025 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2008-09,2012-13,2013-14, 2014-15,2017-18,2019-20 & 2020-2021) Cuttack Central Co.Op. Bank Ltd., , Vs Dcit, Circle-1(1), Balikuda, At/Po: Balikuda, Cuttack Jagatsinghpur Pan No. : Aaabc 0373 Q .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri N.R.Biswal, Ca : Shri Ashim Kr Chakraborty, Cit Dr & राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By Shri Vijaya Singh, Ld Sr Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 2 /12/2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 2 /12/2025

For Appellant: Shri N.R.Biswal, CA
Section 249(3)Section 5

249(3) of the Income Tax Act, provides powers to the ld Commissioner of Income Appeals to condone the delay in filing the appeal before him. It has been used in Section 5 of Indian Limitation Act, 1963 that whenever interpretation and construction before the Hon’ble High Court as well as before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, then

CUTTACK CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,CUTTACK vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), CUTTACK, CUTTACK

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 513/CTK/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack02 Dec 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumarआयकर अपील सं/Ita Nos.507 To 511 & 513 & 514/Ctk/2025 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2008-09,2012-13,2013-14, 2014-15,2017-18,2019-20 & 2020-2021) Cuttack Central Co.Op. Bank Ltd., , Vs Dcit, Circle-1(1), Balikuda, At/Po: Balikuda, Cuttack Jagatsinghpur Pan No. : Aaabc 0373 Q .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri N.R.Biswal, Ca : Shri Ashim Kr Chakraborty, Cit Dr & राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By Shri Vijaya Singh, Ld Sr Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 2 /12/2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 2 /12/2025

For Appellant: Shri N.R.Biswal, CA
Section 249(3)Section 5

249(3) of the Income Tax Act, provides powers to the ld Commissioner of Income Appeals to condone the delay in filing the appeal before him. It has been used in Section 5 of Indian Limitation Act, 1963 that whenever interpretation and construction before the Hon’ble High Court as well as before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, then

CUTTACK CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,CUTTACK vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), CUTTACK, CUTTACK

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 509/CTK/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack02 Dec 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumarआयकर अपील सं/Ita Nos.507 To 511 & 513 & 514/Ctk/2025 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2008-09,2012-13,2013-14, 2014-15,2017-18,2019-20 & 2020-2021) Cuttack Central Co.Op. Bank Ltd., , Vs Dcit, Circle-1(1), Balikuda, At/Po: Balikuda, Cuttack Jagatsinghpur Pan No. : Aaabc 0373 Q .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri N.R.Biswal, Ca : Shri Ashim Kr Chakraborty, Cit Dr & राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By Shri Vijaya Singh, Ld Sr Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 2 /12/2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 2 /12/2025

For Appellant: Shri N.R.Biswal, CA
Section 249(3)Section 5

249(3) of the Income Tax Act, provides powers to the ld Commissioner of Income Appeals to condone the delay in filing the appeal before him. It has been used in Section 5 of Indian Limitation Act, 1963 that whenever interpretation and construction before the Hon’ble High Court as well as before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, then

CUTTACK CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,CUTTACK vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), CUTTACK, CUTTACK

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 508/CTK/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack02 Dec 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumarआयकर अपील सं/Ita Nos.507 To 511 & 513 & 514/Ctk/2025 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2008-09,2012-13,2013-14, 2014-15,2017-18,2019-20 & 2020-2021) Cuttack Central Co.Op. Bank Ltd., , Vs Dcit, Circle-1(1), Balikuda, At/Po: Balikuda, Cuttack Jagatsinghpur Pan No. : Aaabc 0373 Q .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri N.R.Biswal, Ca : Shri Ashim Kr Chakraborty, Cit Dr & राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By Shri Vijaya Singh, Ld Sr Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 2 /12/2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 2 /12/2025

For Appellant: Shri N.R.Biswal, CA
Section 249(3)Section 5

249(3) of the Income Tax Act, provides powers to the ld Commissioner of Income Appeals to condone the delay in filing the appeal before him. It has been used in Section 5 of Indian Limitation Act, 1963 that whenever interpretation and construction before the Hon’ble High Court as well as before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, then

CUTTACK CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,CUTTACK vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), CUTTACK, CUTTACK

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 514/CTK/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack02 Dec 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumarआयकर अपील सं/Ita Nos.507 To 511 & 513 & 514/Ctk/2025 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2008-09,2012-13,2013-14, 2014-15,2017-18,2019-20 & 2020-2021) Cuttack Central Co.Op. Bank Ltd., , Vs Dcit, Circle-1(1), Balikuda, At/Po: Balikuda, Cuttack Jagatsinghpur Pan No. : Aaabc 0373 Q .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri N.R.Biswal, Ca : Shri Ashim Kr Chakraborty, Cit Dr & राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By Shri Vijaya Singh, Ld Sr Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 2 /12/2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 2 /12/2025

For Appellant: Shri N.R.Biswal, CA
Section 249(3)Section 5

249(3) of the Income Tax Act, provides powers to the ld Commissioner of Income Appeals to condone the delay in filing the appeal before him. It has been used in Section 5 of Indian Limitation Act, 1963 that whenever interpretation and construction before the Hon’ble High Court as well as before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, then

CUTTACK CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,CUTTACK vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-1(1), CUTTACK, CUTTACK

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 511/CTK/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack02 Dec 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumarआयकर अपील सं/Ita Nos.507 To 511 & 513 & 514/Ctk/2025 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2008-09,2012-13,2013-14, 2014-15,2017-18,2019-20 & 2020-2021) Cuttack Central Co.Op. Bank Ltd., , Vs Dcit, Circle-1(1), Balikuda, At/Po: Balikuda, Cuttack Jagatsinghpur Pan No. : Aaabc 0373 Q .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri N.R.Biswal, Ca : Shri Ashim Kr Chakraborty, Cit Dr & राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By Shri Vijaya Singh, Ld Sr Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 2 /12/2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 2 /12/2025

For Appellant: Shri N.R.Biswal, CA
Section 249(3)Section 5

249(3) of the Income Tax Act, provides powers to the ld Commissioner of Income Appeals to condone the delay in filing the appeal before him. It has been used in Section 5 of Indian Limitation Act, 1963 that whenever interpretation and construction before the Hon’ble High Court as well as before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, then