MR. SAROJ KAMAR SENAPATI,BHADRAK vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, BHADRAK WARD, BHADRAK

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy(Kz) Before Shri Rl Reddy(Kz) & Assessment Year : 2017-18 Saroj Kumar Senap Saroj Kumar Senapati Vs. Ito, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak Ito, Bhadrak Ward, Bhadrak Patharadi, Charampa, Bhad Patharadi, Charampa, Bhadrak, 756101 Pan/Gir No. Aycp Aycps 1847 B (Appellant) (Appellant .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By : Shri B.R.Panda, Adv Revenue By : Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr. Dr S.C.Mohanty, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 30/06/202 /2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 30/06/202 /2025 O R D E R

condone the delay of 446 days and admit the appeal for adjudication. 4. Brief facts of the case are that the assesse is an individual carrying on rice business on wholesale basis filed his return of income for the assessment year 2017-18 on 21.3.2018 disclosing net income at Rs.2,98,520/-. The case was selected for scrutiny

JAMUNA REALTY PVT. LTD. ,CUTTACK vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed with the direction to the AO herein given above

210 CTR (SC)178. (ii) CIT vs Bilahari Investment Pvt Ltd., 215 CTR (SC) 201. Others income Taxation of other income, which includes interest income is taken care in A.Y 2016-17 and taxation of the same in A.Y. 2015-16 would amount to double taxation and more tax of Rs.1,90,282/- has been paid and hence, there