Search: condonation of delay

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 206C(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 206C(6)8 TDS5 Condonation of Delay5 Section 206C4 Section 226(3)3 Section 272A(2)(k)3 Section 272A3 Section 273B3 Section 272A(2)(K)

M/S. GOPAL AND COMPANY,ROURKELA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS/TCS), ROURKELA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 84/CTK/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack28 Oct 2021AY 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri P.K.Mishra, ARFor Respondent: Shri S.C.Mohanty, DR

Section 206CSection 206C(6)

condone the delay of 38 days in filing the both the appeals. 3. The assessee has filed the following revised and précised grounds of appeal for A.Y.2016-2017 :- 1. For that the orders passed by Authorities below are not just and proper and are not in accordance of law under the acts and in the circumstances of the case, as such

M/S. GOPAL AND COMPANY,ROURKELA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS/TCS), ROURKELA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

M/S. GOPAL AND COMPANY,ROURKELA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS/TCS), ROURKELA

M/S. GOPAL AND COMPANY,ROURKELA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS/TCS), ROURKELA

M/S. GOPAL AND COMPANY,ROURKELA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS/TCS), ROURKELA

M/S. GOPAL AND COMPANY,ROURKELA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS/TCS), ROURKELA

SHISHU ANANTA MAHAVIDYALAYA,KHURDA vs. JCIT(TDS), BHUBANESWAR

SHISHU ANANTA MAHAVIDYALAYA,KHURDA vs. JCIT(TDS), BHUBANESWAR

SHISHU ANANTA MAHAVIDYALAYA,KHURDA vs. JCIT(TDS), BHUBANESWAR