Search: condonation of delay

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 206clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 206C(6)8 Section 271(1)(c)5 Section 206C4 Section 2634 Section 143(3)3 TDS3 Limitation/Time-bar3 Condonation of Delay3 Section 80

M/S. GOPAL AND COMPANY,ROURKELA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS/TCS), ROURKELA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 84/CTK/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack28 Oct 2021AY 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri P.K.Mishra, ARFor Respondent: Shri S.C.Mohanty, DR

Section 206CSection 206C(6)

condone the delay of 38 days in filing the both the appeals. 3. The assessee has filed the following revised and précised grounds of appeal for A.Y.2016-2017 :- 1. For that the orders passed by Authorities below are not just and proper and are not in accordance of law under the acts and in the circumstances of the case, as such

M/S. GOPAL AND COMPANY,ROURKELA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS/TCS), ROURKELA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

M/S. GOPAL AND COMPANY,ROURKELA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS/TCS), ROURKELA

M/S. GOPAL AND COMPANY,ROURKELA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS/TCS), ROURKELA

M/S. GOPAL AND COMPANY,ROURKELA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS/TCS), ROURKELA

M/S. GOPAL AND COMPANY,ROURKELA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS/TCS), ROURKELA

INSTITUTE OF TECHNICAL TRAINING,SUNDARGARH vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), HYDERABAD

MARUTI ESTATE (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1), BHUBANESWAR

ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1), SAMBALPUR, SAMBALPUR vs. M/S. DIVAKAR ENGINEERING PVT. LTD., SAMBALPUR