BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 173clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai201Delhi109Karnataka101Mumbai77Chandigarh61Pune51Kolkata39Amritsar35Jaipur31Ahmedabad29Bangalore27Panaji26Surat19Lucknow17Rajkot9Indore7Visakhapatnam5Hyderabad5Patna5Telangana5Agra4SC3Calcutta3Cuttack2Raipur2Jabalpur2Ranchi2Himachal Pradesh1Nagpur1Cochin1Rajasthan1Andhra Pradesh1Allahabad1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 12A4Section 292B3Section 2712Section 1472Section 112

M/S. MAHASAKTI FOUNDATION,KALAHANDI vs. ACIT, SAMBALPUR

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 134/CTK/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack06 Jun 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri P.K.Mishra, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kunal Singh, CIT DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 147Section 194ASection 201(1)Section 40

condonation of delay in seeking registration was not available. This clearly goes to prove that the first proviso to section 12A(2) was brought in the statute only as a retrospective effect with a view not to affect genuine charitable trusts and societies carrying on genuine charitable objects in the earlier years and substantive conditions stipulated in section

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR vs. SRI BAJRANG KUMAR AGRAWAL, SUNDARGARH

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 388/CTK/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack14 Jan 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Laxmi Prasad Sahuassessment Year : 2009-2010

For Appellant: Shri S.K.Tulsiyan, ARFor Respondent: Shri S.M.Keshmamat, CIT DR
Section 271Section 292B

173 ITR 306). (v) The CIT (Appeals) ought to have held that the case of SSA's Emeralds Meadow vs. CIT (2016) 73 taxmann.com 248 (SC) is not binding in view of the decision of Shanmugavel Nadar (263 ITR 658) (SC), as the same is merely a dismissal, where it was held that a rejection of SLP through