Search: condonation of delay

8 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 166clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 26316 Section 80I12 Section 1478 Section 14A6 Section 143(3)5 Addition to Income5 Condonation of Delay5 Section 271(1)(c)4 Section 143(2)

THE MAYURBHANJ CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,MAYURBHANJ vs. PRINCIPAL CIT, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 267/CTK/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack23 Dec 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.267/Ctk/2018 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2013-2014) M/S The Mayurbhanj Central Vs. Ito, Ward-1, Baripada Cooperative Bank Limited, At/Po: Baripada, Mayurbhanj स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaaam 7185 J (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Ambika Prasad Mohanty,Ca िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Subhendu Dutta, Dr सुनवाई की तािीख / Date Of Hearing : 07/11/2019 घोषणा की तािीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 23/12/2019 आदेश / O R D E R Per L.P.Sahu, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Pr. Cit, Cuttack Dated 30.03.2018 For The Assessment Year 2013-2014. 2. As Per The Office Note/Order Sheet Entry, The Appeal Of The Assessee Is Barred By 18 Days. In This Regard, The Ld. Ar Of The Assessee Has Filed An Application For Condonation Of Delay Along With An Affidavit Stating Therein The Sufficient Reasons For Delay In Filing The Present Appeal. On The Other Hand, Ld. Dr Did Not Object To Condone The Delay. We Have Also Gone Through The Said Application Along With The Affidavit Filed By The Assessee Explaining The Sufficient Reasons For Delay. Considering The Application Along With The Affidavit Of The Assessee For 2 Condonation Of Delay, We Condone The Delay In Filing The Appeal & The Appeal Is Heard Finally.

For Appellant: Shri Ambika Prasad Mohanty,CAFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR

Section 143(3)Section 263

THE MAYURBHANJ CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,MAYURBHANJ vs. PRINCIPAL CIT, CUTTACK

THE MAYURBHANJ CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,MAYURBHANJ vs. PRINCIPAL CIT, CUTTACK

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR vs. SMT. INDRANI PATNAIK, ROURKELA

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR vs. SMT. INDRANI PATNAIK, ROURKELA

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR vs. SMT. INDRANI PATNAIK, ROURKELA

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR vs. SMT. INDRANI PATNAIK, ROURKELA

SHREE BALAJI ENGICONS PVT. LTD,JHARSUGUDA vs. PRINCIPAL CIT, SAMBALPUR

M/S- RAWAT BALAJI (JOINT VENTURE),JHARSUGUDA vs. PRILNCIPAL, CIT, SAMBALPUR

M/S- SBEP-GRIL(JOINT VENTURE),JHARSUGUDA vs. PRINCIPAL CIT, SAMBALPUR