Search: condonation of delay

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 153C(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 26311 Section 153C9 Section 153A7 Section 143(3)3 Addition to Income3 Search & Seizure2 Limitation/Time-bar2

ORISSA CRICKET ASSOCIATION,CUTTACK vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 177/CTK/2020[2001-02]Status: HeardITAT Cuttack20 Jun 2022AY 2001-02

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Arun Khodpiaorissa Cricket Association, Barabati Statidum, Cuttack Pan No.Aaaao 0319 F …………….. Assessee Versus Acit (Exemptions), Bhubaneswar ………………Revenue

Section 153ASection 153C

condone the delay of 210 days in filing the present appeal and the appeal is heard finally. 3. It was submitted by the ld. AR that there was a search & seizure conducted on 28.03.2016 in the residential premises of Sri Ashirbad Behera, Secretary of the assessee. It was the submission that in the course of search one set of document

SMT. MAMTA SHARMA,BARGARH vs. PRINCIPAL CIT (CENTRAL) , VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 33/CTK/2020[2012-13]Status: Disposed

ORISSA CRICKET ASSOCIATION,CUTTACK vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), BHUBANESWAR

SMT. MAMTA SHARMA,BARGARH vs. PRINCIPAL CIT (CENTRAL) , VISAKHAPATNAM

ORISSA CRICKET ASSOCIATION,CUTTACK vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), BHUBANESWAR

SMT. MAMTA SHARMA,BARGARH vs. PRINCIPAL CIT (CENTRAL) , VISAKHAPATNAM

M/S. BAJRANGBALI STEEL INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD,ROURKLA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR

M/S. BISHANDAYAL JEWELLERS,CUTTACK vs. PRINCIPAL CIT (CENTRAL), HYDERABAD