BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 14Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai312Mumbai307Kolkata244Delhi201Bangalore43Amritsar36Hyderabad33Ahmedabad26Pune24Lucknow21Jaipur18Karnataka14Chandigarh12Calcutta9Cuttack5Guwahati5Panaji5Cochin4Indore3Raipur2Rajkot2Surat2Visakhapatnam2Nagpur1SC1

Key Topics

Section 1478Condonation of Delay5Section 271(1)(c)4Section 143(2)4Section 1484Section 374Section 2634Reopening of Assessment4Addition to Income

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR vs. SMT. INDRANI PATNAIK, ROURKELA

In the result, all the four appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 180/CTK/2020[209-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack11 Dec 2025
Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 37

condone\nthe delay and admit the appeal for hearing.\n3. As the facts and circumstances are similar in ITA Nos. 179 &\n181/CTK/2020, hence, for brevity we will take ITA No.179/CTK/2020\nfor A.Y. 2009-10 and decide the issues accordingly.\nΑ.Υ. 2009-10\nITA No. 179/СТК/2020\n4. The first issue raised by the Revenue in ground

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR vs. SMT. INDRANI PATNAIK, ROURKELA

In the result, all the four appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

4
ITA 181/CTK/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack11 Dec 2025AY 2010-11
Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 37

condone\nthe delay and admit the appeal for hearing.\n3. As the facts and circumstances are similar in ITA Nos. 179 &\n181/CTK/2020, hence, for brevity we will take ITA No.179/CTK/2020\nfor A.Y. 2009-10 and decide the issues accordingly.\nΑ.Υ. 2009-10\nITA No. 179/СТК/2020\n4. The first issue raised by the Revenue in ground

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR vs. SMT. INDRANI PATNAIK, ROURKELA

In the result, all the four appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 182/CTK/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack11 Dec 2025AY 2010-11
Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 37

condone\nthe delay and admit the appeal for hearing.\n3. As the facts and circumstances are similar in ITA Nos. 179 &\n181/CTK/2020, hence, for brevity we will take ITA No.179/CTK/2020\nfor A.Y. 2009-10 and decide the issues accordingly.\nΑ.Υ. 2009-10\nITA No. 179/СТК/2020\n4. The first issue raised by the Revenue in ground

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR vs. SMT. INDRANI PATNAIK, ROURKELA

In the result, all the four appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 179/CTK/2020[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack11 Dec 2025AY 2009-10
Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 37

condone\nthe delay and admit the appeal for hearing.\n3. As the facts and circumstances are similar in ITA Nos. 179 &\n181/CTK/2020, hence, for brevity we will take ITA No.179/CTK/2020\nfor A.Y. 2009-10 and decide the issues accordingly.\nΑ.Υ. 2009-10\nITA No. 179/CTK/2020\n4. The first issue raised by the Revenue in ground

S. M. AGRO PLANTERE& PROCESSORS PVT. LTD.,DHENKANAL vs. PCIR RANGE-1,, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 65/CTK/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack30 Nov 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Girish Agrawalassessment Year : 2015-16 S.M.Agro S.M.Agro Plantere Plantere & & Vs. Pr. Pr. Cit, Cit, Range Range-1, Processors Pvt Ltd., Anand Processors Pvt Ltd., Anand Bhubaneswar. Bhubaneswar. Bazar, Dhenkanal. Bazar, Dhenkanal. Pan/Gir No. Pan/Gir No.Aagcs 9108 L (Appellant) ) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By : Shri J.M.Patnaik , Adv Revenue By : Dr.Abani Kanta Nayak, Abani Kanta Nayak, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 30/11 11/2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 30/11 /11/2023

For Appellant: Shri J.M.PatnaikFor Respondent: Dr.Abani Kanta Nayak
Section 14ASection 263Section 7A

condone the delay of 343 days and admit the appeal for hearing. 4. It was submitted by ld AR that the original assessment in the case of the assessee was a ‘Limited Scrutiny’ assessment. It was the submission that the Pr. CIT has invoked his powers u/s.263 of the Act on the ground that the Assessing Officer had not considered