BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1 result for “condonation of delay”+ Section 145Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Chandigarh88Mumbai19Chennai19Delhi11Bangalore9Ahmedabad8Jaipur4Raipur3Kolkata2Pune2Rajkot1Cochin1Cuttack1Hyderabad1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 145(3)2

OMKAR STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED,SUNDARGARH vs. ACIT, ROURKELA CIRCLE, ROURKELA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 512/CTK/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack17 May 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm Omkar Steels Private Limited Vs. Acit, Rourkela Circle, Kunjharia, Bijabahal, Rourkela Sundargarh, स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaaco 8886 H (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Ambika Prasad Mohanty, Ar िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri D.K.Pradhan, Dr सुनवाई की तािीख / Date Of Hearing : 03/05/2018 घोषणा की तािीख/Date Of Pronouncement 17/05/2018 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: The Assessee Has Filed This Appeal Against The Order Of Cit(A), Sambalpur, Dated 28.09.2017, Passed In I.T.Appeal No.0268/10-11, U/S.144/147/250 Of The I.T.Act For The Assessment Year 2007-2008. 2. As Per The Office Note, There Is A Delay Of 10 Days In Filing The Present Appeal. The Assessee Has Filed An Application For Condonation Of Delay Along With An Affidavit Explaining The Reasons For Delay. Considering The Application Of Assessee & Looking To The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & Ld. Dr Has No Serious Objection, We Allow The Application & Condone The Delay Of 10 Days In Filing The Present Appeal & The Appeal Is Heard Finally. 3. The Sole Substantive Ground Raised By The Assessee Is That The Cit(A) Is Not Justified In Upholding The Rejection Of Books Of Accounts

For Appellant: Shri Ambika Prasad Mohanty, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Pradhan, DR
Section 133(6)Section 142(1)
Section 143(1)
Section 143(2)
Section 144
Section 145
Section 145(3)
Section 145A
Section 147
Section 148

condone the delay of 10 days in filing the present appeal and the appeal is heard finally. 3. The sole substantive ground raised by the assessee is that the CIT(A) is not justified in upholding the rejection of books of accounts 2 u/s.145(3) of the Act and also restricting the estimation made