BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1 result for “condonation of delay”+ Section 12(1)(ac)clear

Sorted by relevance

Hyderabad126Mumbai117Karnataka109Pune104Chennai100Kolkata90Ahmedabad73Delhi70Chandigarh61Jaipur48Calcutta34Amritsar31Bangalore30Surat26Rajkot14Indore13SC9Panaji4Nagpur4Patna4Agra3Cochin3Rajasthan3Visakhapatnam3Orissa2Jabalpur2Guwahati2Raipur2Telangana2Lucknow2Jodhpur2Dehradun1Himachal Pradesh1Cuttack1R.M. LODHA ANIL R. DAVE1Andhra Pradesh1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 114

DCIT (EXEMPTIONS), BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. NILAKANTHA EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 336/CTK/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack22 Oct 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: S/ S/Shri Chandra Mohan Garg, Judicial & Manish Borad & Manish Borad & Manish Boradassessment Year : 2009-2010 2010 Dcit (Exemptions), Dcit (Exemptions), Vs. M/S. Nilakantha Educational & M/S. Nilakantha Educational & Bhubaneswar. Bhubaneswar. Charitable Trust, At: Anantpur, Charitable Trust, At: Anantpur, Po: Phulnakhara, Dist:Khurda Po: Phulnakhara, Dist:Khurda Pan/Gir No. No.Aaatn 4043 J (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri M.K.Gautam, Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 21 /10/ 20 / 2021 Date Of Pronouncement : 22 /10 10/2021 O R D E R

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri M.K.Gautam
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 253(5)

12 days. 4. None appeared on behalf of the respondent-assessee. Ld CIT DR reiterated the submissions made in the condonation petition and request to condone the delay because due to unavoidable circumstances, the delay has been occurred. Since, there was no response from the side of the respondent-assessee to oppose the condonation petition, we condone the delay