BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

700 results for “condonation of delay”+ Condonation of Delayclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai6,162Mumbai5,355Delhi4,820Kolkata3,420Pune2,601Bangalore2,305Ahmedabad1,653Hyderabad1,619Jaipur1,071Patna1,049Cochin772Chandigarh764Nagpur704Cuttack700Surat681Indore622Visakhapatnam504Amritsar478Lucknow462Raipur451Karnataka391Rajkot388Agra340Calcutta258Panaji253Dehradun156Guwahati143Jodhpur119Jabalpur102Ranchi96SC79Telangana77Allahabad68Varanasi44Kerala32Andhra Pradesh21Orissa14Punjab & Haryana12Rajasthan11Himachal Pradesh6A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2R.M. LODHA ANIL R. DAVE1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Uttarakhand1DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1VIKRAMAJIT SEN SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 26345Limitation/Time-bar41Section 143(1)36Condonation of Delay36Addition to Income32Section 143(3)23Section 14719Section 15417Section 12A

RAVI METALLICS LIMITED,ROURKELA vs. PR.CIT, SAMBALPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 34/CTK/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack05 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Arun Khodpiaravi Metallics Limited, I/10, Civil Township, Rourkela-769004 Pan No.Adqps 4031 G ………………Assessee Versus Pr.Cit, Sambalpur ………………..Revenue Shri P.R.Mohanty, Ar For The Assessee Shri M.K.Gautam, Cit-Dr For The Revenue Date Of Hearing : 30/05/2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 30/05/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Pr.Cit, Sambalpur, Passed U/S.263 Of The Act In Case No.Pcit/Sbp/263/26/2018-19, Dated 29.03.2019 For The Assessment Year 2014-2015. Heard On The Question Of Condonation Of Delay 2. On Perusal Of The Record, We Found That The Appeal Of The Assessee Is Barred By 686 Days. In This Regard, Ld. Ar Filed An Application Along With Affidavit For Condonation Of Delay, Wherein It Has Been Submitted That The Delay Occurred In Filing The Present Appeal Is Neither Intentional Nor Deliberate But Due To Unfortunate & Unavoidable Circumstances Beyond

Section 253Section 263

delay of 315 days. In the application for condonation of delay, it has been alleged that delay

Showing 1–20 of 700 · Page 1 of 35

...
17
Section 14417
Exemption17
Section 11(2)16

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS , CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 792/CTK/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condone the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 335 days in filing the appeal before

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 789/CTK/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condone the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 335 days in filing the appeal before

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 795/CTK/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condone the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 335 days in filing the appeal before

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 787/CTK/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condone the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 335 days in filing the appeal before

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS,, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 782/CTK/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condone the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 335 days in filing the appeal before

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 784/CTK/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condone the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 335 days in filing the appeal before

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 791/CTK/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condone the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 335 days in filing the appeal before

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 790/CTK/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condone the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 335 days in filing the appeal before

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 780/CTK/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condone the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 335 days in filing the appeal before

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 781/CTK/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condone the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 335 days in filing the appeal before

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 785/CTK/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condone the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 335 days in filing the appeal before

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS , CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 783/CTK/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condone the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 335 days in filing the appeal before

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 794/CTK/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condone the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 335 days in filing the appeal before

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS , CUUTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 786/CTK/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condone the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 335 days in filing the appeal before

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 793/CTK/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condone the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 335 days in filing the appeal before

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO , WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 788/CTK/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condone the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 335 days in filing the appeal before

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 796/CTK/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condone the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 335 days in filing the appeal before

SAINT XAVIER EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST,BHUBANESWAR vs. ITO(EXEMPTION) WARD, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 405/CTK/2024[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Cuttack04 Dec 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Before Shri George Mathanmember & Manish Agarwal Manish Agarwalita Nos.405 & 406 /Ctk/2024 Assessment Year Assessment Years : 2017-18 & 2021-202 2022 Saint Xavier Educational & Saint Xavier Educational & Vs. Ito (Exemption) Ito (Exemption) Charitable Trust, Plot No.12, Charitable Trust, Plot No.12, Ward, Bhubaneswar Ward, Bhubaneswar Janapath, , Satyanagar, Satyanagar, Bhubaneswar Pan/Gir No. No.Aaits 4367 A (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Brajabandhu Bihari, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Saroj Kumar Dubey, CIT DR
Section 3Section 5

condoning the delay; and (viii) Delay condonation application has to be decided on the parameters laid

SAINT XAVIER EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST,BHUBANESWAR vs. ITO(EXEMPTION) WARD,, BHUANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 406/CTK/2024[2021-22]Status: HeardITAT Cuttack04 Dec 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Before Shri George Mathanmember & Manish Agarwal Manish Agarwalita Nos.405 & 406 /Ctk/2024 Assessment Year Assessment Years : 2017-18 & 2021-202 2022 Saint Xavier Educational & Saint Xavier Educational & Vs. Ito (Exemption) Ito (Exemption) Charitable Trust, Plot No.12, Charitable Trust, Plot No.12, Ward, Bhubaneswar Ward, Bhubaneswar Janapath, , Satyanagar, Satyanagar, Bhubaneswar Pan/Gir No. No.Aaits 4367 A (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Brajabandhu Bihari, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Saroj Kumar Dubey, CIT DR
Section 3Section 5

condoning the delay; and (viii) Delay condonation application has to be decided on the parameters laid