Search: condonation of delay

13 results for “condonation of delay”+ Bogus Purchasesclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 153A4 Condonation of Delay3 Limitation/Time-bar3 Addition to Income3 Section 10(38)2 Section 2632 Capital Gains2 Long Term Capital Gains2 Exemption

RAVI METALLICS LIMITED,ROURKELA vs. PR.CIT, SAMBALPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 34/CTK/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack05 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Arun Khodpiaravi Metallics Limited, I/10, Civil Township, Rourkela-769004 Pan No.Adqps 4031 G ………………Assessee Versus Pr.Cit, Sambalpur ………………..Revenue Shri P.R.Mohanty, Ar For The Assessee Shri M.K.Gautam, Cit-Dr For The Revenue Date Of Hearing : 30/05/2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 30/05/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Pr.Cit, Sambalpur, Passed U/S.263 Of The Act In Case No.Pcit/Sbp/263/26/2018-19, Dated 29.03.2019 For The Assessment Year 2014-2015. Heard On The Question Of Condonation Of Delay 2. On Perusal Of The Record, We Found That The Appeal Of The Assessee Is Barred By 686 Days. In This Regard, Ld. Ar Filed An Application Along With Affidavit For Condonation Of Delay, Wherein It Has Been Submitted That The Delay Occurred In Filing The Present Appeal Is Neither Intentional Nor Deliberate But Due To Unfortunate & Unavoidable Circumstances Beyond

Section 253Section 263

delay in filing the appeal stands condoned and the appeal is admitted for hearing. Heard on the merits of the appeal 7. Now, we shall proceed to decide the appeal of the assessee challenging the order passed u/s.263 of the Act. 8. It was submitted by the ld. AR that the Pr.CIT has invoked his powers u/s.263

RAVI METALLICS LIMITED,ROURKELA vs. PR.CIT, SAMBALPUR

RAVI METALLICS LIMITED,ROURKELA vs. PR.CIT, SAMBALPUR

M/S. BAJRANGBALI STEEL INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD,ROURKLA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR

MUKESH AGARWAL,ROURKELA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE, WARD 1, ROURKELA

PUJA AGARWAL,ROURKELA vs. ITO WARD 1, ROURKELA

ORISSA CHROME EXPORT & MINING COMPANY PVT. LTD.,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1(2), BHUBANESWAR

M/S. EXIM INDIA OIL COMPANY LTD,CUTTACK vs. DCIT, CUTTACK

ACIT, CIRCLE- 2(1), CUTTACK vs. SMT. SHASHI KALA AGARWAL, CUTTACK

ACIT, CIRCLE- 2(1), CUTTACK vs. SHRI SANTOSH KUMAR AGARWALA, CUTTACK

ACIT, CIRCLE- 2(1), CUTTACK vs. SHRI ASHWIN KUMAR AGARWAL, CUTTACK

ACIT,CIRCLE-2(1), CUTTACK vs. ASHWIN KUMAR AGARWALA, CUTTACK

ACIT,CIRCLE-2(1), , CUTTACK vs. SMT. SHASHI KALA AGARWALA, CUTTACK

ACIT, CIRCLE- 2(1), CUTTACK vs. SHRI SAURAV AGARWAL, CUTTACK

ACIT,CIRCLE-2(1), CUTTACK vs. SHRI SANTOSH KUMAR AGARWALA, CUTTACK