Search: condonation of delay | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

600 results for “condonation of delay”

Sorted by relevance

Chennai5,084 Mumbai4,461 Delhi4,084 Pune2,471 Kolkata2,445 Bangalore2,063 Ahmedabad1,594 Hyderabad1,393 Patna1,037 Jaipur958 Chandigarh685 Cochin655 Cuttack600 Indore562 Surat556 Nagpur555 Visakhapatnam431 Raipur427 Amritsar405 Bombay385 Lucknow374 Rajkot361 Agra334 Panaji210 Dehradun145 Guwahati125 Jodhpur113 Ranchi96 Jabalpur90 SC79 Allahabad62 Varanasi26 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2 DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1 A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1 VIKRAMAJIT SEN SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1 R.M. LODHA ANIL R. DAVE1

Key Topics

Section 263103 Condonation of Delay42 Limitation/Time-bar42 Section 143(3)35 Addition to Income30 Section 14422 Exemption21 Section 12A20 Section 271(1)(c)

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 790/CTK/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condone the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 335 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal and appeal

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS , CUUTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 786/CTK/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condone the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 335 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal and appeal

Showing 1–20 of 600 · Page 1 of 30

...

17

Natural Justice14

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS , CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 792/CTK/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condone the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 335 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal and appeal

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO , WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 788/CTK/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condone the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 335 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal and appeal

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 780/CTK/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condone the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 335 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal and appeal

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 785/CTK/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condone the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 335 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal and appeal

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 789/CTK/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condone the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 335 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal and appeal

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 787/CTK/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condone the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 335 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal and appeal

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 781/CTK/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condone the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 335 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal and appeal

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 794/CTK/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condone the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 335 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal and appeal

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 791/CTK/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condone the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 335 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal and appeal

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 796/CTK/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condone the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 335 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal and appeal

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS , CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 783/CTK/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condone the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 335 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal and appeal

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 784/CTK/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condone the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 335 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal and appeal

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 793/CTK/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condone the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 335 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal and appeal

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 795/CTK/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condone the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 335 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal and appeal

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS,, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 782/CTK/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condone the delay. Accordingly, we condone the delay of 335 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal and appeal

SAINT XAVIER EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST,BHUBANESWAR vs. ITO(EXEMPTION) WARD,, BHUANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 406/CTK/2024[2021-22]Status: HeardITAT Cuttack04 Dec 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Before Shri George Mathanmember & Manish Agarwal Manish Agarwalita Nos.405 & 406 /Ctk/2024 Assessment Year Assessment Years : 2017-18 & 2021-202 2022 Saint Xavier Educational & Saint Xavier Educational & Vs. Ito (Exemption) Ito (Exemption) Charitable Trust, Plot No.12, Charitable Trust, Plot No.12, Ward, Bhubaneswar Ward, Bhubaneswar Janapath, , Satyanagar, Satyanagar, Bhubaneswar Pan/Gir No. No.Aaits 4367 A (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Brajabandhu Bihari, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Saroj Kumar Dubey, CIT DR

Section 3Section 5

condoning the delay; and (viii) Delay condonation application has to be decided on the parameters laid down for condoning the delay

SAINT XAVIER EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST,BHUBANESWAR vs. ITO(EXEMPTION) WARD, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 405/CTK/2024[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Cuttack04 Dec 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Before Shri George Mathanmember & Manish Agarwal Manish Agarwalita Nos.405 & 406 /Ctk/2024 Assessment Year Assessment Years : 2017-18 & 2021-202 2022 Saint Xavier Educational & Saint Xavier Educational & Vs. Ito (Exemption) Ito (Exemption) Charitable Trust, Plot No.12, Charitable Trust, Plot No.12, Ward, Bhubaneswar Ward, Bhubaneswar Janapath, , Satyanagar, Satyanagar, Bhubaneswar Pan/Gir No. No.Aaits 4367 A (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Brajabandhu Bihari, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Saroj Kumar Dubey, CIT DR

Section 3Section 5

condoning the delay; and (viii) Delay condonation application has to be decided on the parameters laid down for condoning the delay

BASUDEV SWAIN,ROURKELA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ROURKELA

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 662/CTK/2025[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack23 Dec 2025AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumarआयकर अपील सं/Ita No.662 & 697/Ctk/2025 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2014-15 & 2015-16) Basudev Swain, Hig- B 110, Vs Acit, Rourkela Phase-Iii, Kalinga Vihar, Chhend Colony, Rourkela-769015 Pan No. : Aygps 2479 F (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) .. (""यथ" / Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Rakesh Ray Mohapatra, Ar राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Vijaya Singh, Sr. Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 23 /12/2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 23 /12/2025

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Ray Mohapatra, ARFor Respondent: Shri Vijaya Singh, Sr. DR

condoned. He prayed that the delay in filing of the appeal was not intentional and, therefore, prayed for condoning the delay